Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🥷🏿 Добровольно ушедший в подвал

@sandronaut

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

307subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001297772570
TypeChannel
Username@sandronaut
DescriptionЗаранее обречённый на полнейший провал
Created20 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/sandronaut

Growth

3076 Aug 2026, 22:53 — 307 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:02 — 307 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:536 Aug 2026, 23:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 306–308 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 23:02307no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:53307first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.7%
avg views ÷ 307 subscribers
Avg views / post
150
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,944
Reactions total100
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,140
Videos
160
Links
615

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

146 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6242.5%
🔥3322.6%
👍1510.3%
😁117.53%
💊85.48%
🤔74.79%
🤬42.74%
🤯32.05%
😱21.37%
😭10.685%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sandronaut. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 19:11 UTC61 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📌 Для меня это самый полезный метод из книги "Атомные привычки", квинтэссенция книги. Благодаря нему я начал много читать, базово овладел фортепиано и сделал другие важные шаги. ПРАВИЛО 2-х МИНУТ: Даже когда вы знаете, что стоит начать с малого, иногда кажется, что проще начать с большого. Когда вы мечтаете измениться, вас неизбежно охватывает радостное возбуждение, и в результате вы пытаетесь сделать слишком боль

🔥3

4 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC84 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

АСТ-коучинг - инфоцыганство? Действительно, слова "коуч", "коучинг"* нами воспринимаются именно так. Более того, так они воспринимаются и мной. Конечно, я не знаю ни одного АСТ-коуча, кроме непосредственно главного популяризатора терапии принятия и действия (АСТ), психотерапевта Расса Хэрисса, автора книги "Ловушка счастья". То есть, возможно, там и попадаются инфоцыгане. Но предлагаю взглянуть на ситуацию. АСТ - э

👍2🤔1

2 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC115 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

"Традиционное определение гласит: цель искусства — создавать физические и цифровые артефакты. Заполнять полки керамикой, книгами и музыкой. Обычно художники не догадываются, но этот итог — лишь побочный продукт мощного импульса. Мы создаем не для того, чтобы производить и продавать материальное. Акт творчества — попытка войти в царство таинственного. Жажда трансцендентного. То, что мы создаем, позволяет нам поделить

🔥82👍1

1 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC128 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

За последний год я прослушал и прочитал некоторое кол-во "достигаторских" книг. И, как говорил выше, всё это оказалось шлаком. Но вот всё таки одна книга для меня стала весьма полезной - "Атомные привычки" Джеймса Клира. Её отличие от прочей литры такого характера как раз в том, что вольно или не вольно автор сделал её достаточно близкой к КПТ. Философия этой книги проста: не изнуряйте себя непосильной работой для

5🔥4👍1

31 Jul 2026, 07:47 UTC140 views8 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Кстати, если вы думаете, что книги по психотерапии нужны только при депрессии, тревожности и всяких расстройствах - вы ошибаетесь! Я ещё когда читал КПТ от Бернса подумал, что это гораздо лучше подходит как основа пресловутого "личностного роста" и "достигаторства" (в хорошем смысле), чем 99% книг, видео и прочего контента от всяких коучей. Можно смело забытьпро все эти пособия про "силу воли", "целеустремлённость",

🔥4👍31

30 Jul 2026, 13:39 UTC148 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Дочитал книгу "Ловушка счастья" Это АСТ (третья волна КПТ). Эту английскую аббревиатуру у нас чаще всего принято расшифровывать "Терапия принятия и ответственности", но мне более адекватным кажется перевод "Терапия принятия и действия". Суть подхода АСТ - принимать свою тревогу и действовать согласно своим ценностям, не смотря на страхи. Книга не так меня впечатлила, как книги по КПТ от Давида Бернса, а упражнения

5👍1

28 Jul 2026, 12:26 UTC174 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сейчас шёл мимо уличного ларька с арбузами и дынями. Рядом проходила бабушка с костылём и сыном (или внуком) с очень сильной ментальной отсталостью. Продавец ларька, выходец из Средней Азии, как кажется, ни с того ни с сего подошёл к ним и просто так дал дыню. ну что? Вызываем "Русскую Общину"?

8😁6

27 Jul 2026, 11:12 UTC191 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ёшки-матрёшки! Ё-моё! Ёпрст! Ёксель-моксель! Ёлки-палки! Ёшкин кот! Ёкарный бабай! Ёперный театр! Ёклмн! Ёк-Макарёк! Ёлки зелёные! Это либо новая диверсия хохлов, уже не по вайлдберриз, а по русскому языку, либо пятая колонна диверсантов церковнославянщиков и любителей высокого штиля. Третьего нон датур

🤬31😁1

26 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC201 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Только узнал, что мне вчера президент Казахстана сделал подарок на день рожденья https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsYLJ0Lejnw

7

25 Jul 2026, 11:24 UTC189 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

Вдохновенно и окончательно Сбрасывали кожу, окуляры и хронометры Благодарно догадываясь, кто они здесь Изумлённо постигая — почему всего навалом и как оно всё кругом

2

25 Jul 2026, 11:15 UTC191 views19 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Мне сегодня исполняется 40 Вы спрашиваете меня, что же я понял, прожив почти полвека? Я отвечу банально: "Я в своем познании настолько преисполнился, что я как будто бы уже сто триллионов миллиардов лет проживаю на триллионах и триллионах таких же планет, как эта Земля" Я будто видел, как люди рождались и умирали. как возникали и рушились империи, как загорались и тухли солнца. А что самое ценное? Самое ценное то

17💊2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sandronaut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🥷🏿 Добровольно ушедший в подвал” (@sandronaut), 307 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sandronaut.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.