Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Sandbox events

@sandbox_events

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

381subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003089049745
TypeChannel
Username@sandbox_events
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sandbox_events

Growth

370381375.56 August 2026 — 370 subscribers6 August 2026 — 370 subscribers13 August 2026 — 381 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 368–383 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:15381+11
6 Aug 2026, 20:47370no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:51370first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 10 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.2%
avg views ÷ 381 subscribers
Avg views / post
233
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (10 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,864
Reactions total32
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

107 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5046.7%
💅1413.1%
👍1312.1%
🍓98.41%
65.61%
🤩54.67%
❤‍🔥32.80%
🐳10.935%
👨‍💻10.935%
💘10.935%
💯10.935%
🕊10.935%
😱10.935%
🤯10.935%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC97 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Verilog Meetup 🕗 12.08.2026, Wednesday, 19:00 📍 Merab Aleksidze Street, 1 💰 Donation welcome 👅 Lang: ru/en 👤 Host: Yuri Panchul For the last 40 years, chip designers have used Verilog hardware description language and logic synthesis technology to create the devices we see everywhere: smartphones, computers, ML hardware accelerators. While the logic of most mass–produced chips, called ASIC (Application Specific In

🔥81💯1😱1

4 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC122 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ST: Security Tuesday #22 Продолжаем тему безопасности агентских приложений. Сегодня поковыряем FinBot CTF от OWASP. Материалы: 1) https://owasp-finbot-ctf.org/ctf/dashboard 3) https://github.com/OWASP/www-project-ai-testing-guide/blob/5c6d357e2290e8c81ab7e6673950e978e1b83604/PDFGenerator/V1.0/OWASP-AI-Testing-Guide-v1.pdf 4) OWASP TOP 10 for agentic Applications (https://genai.owasp.org/resource/owasp-top-10-for-ag

👍2

30 Jul 2026, 11:30 UTC203 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

DoD: DevOpsDay 🕗 31.07.2026, Friday, 20:00 📍 Merab Aleksidze Street, 1 💰 Donation welcome 👅 Lang: ru/en 👤 Host: @pvl_wtf В эту пятницу будем решать command line murders. Приносите с собой ноутбук, будет нужен git, bash, coreutils Обсуждение по традиции в топике DevOpsDays

🔥3

28 Jul 2026, 13:51 UTC194 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ST: Security Tuesday Пробуем тестовый формат совместного исследования технологии eBPF Дисклеймер: Я сам только разбираюсь в теме, поэтому собираемся, чтобы вместе прочитать доки, покрутить примеры и разобраться, как это работает на практике. План: - Узнаем, что такое eBPF и зачем он нужен. - Попробуем применить скрипты из репозитория bpfhacks 💻 Берите с собой ноутбук чтобы экспериментировать вместе. Материалы:

👍1

23 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC251 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

DoD: DevOpsDay 🕗 24.07.2026, Friday, 20:00 📍 Merab Aleksidze Street, 1 💰 Donation welcome 👅 Lang: ru/en 👤 Host: @pvl_wtf В эту пятницу будем решать sadservers.com. Приносите с собой ноутбук Обсуждение по традиции в топике DevOpsDays

🔥4

23 Jul 2026, 05:04 UTC502 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

פיזיקה #0 physics #0 - Three fundamental interactions On Sunday, at the start of the next week, I'm starting a new lecture series on advanced physics. For the first session, we’ll discuss three fundamental interactions: gravity, electromagnetism, and the weak nuclear interaction. This is not a formal university course and not a polished popular-science talk. Expect ideas, derivations, questions, diagrams, and room

🔥5

20 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC243 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ST: Security Tuesday #21 Начинаем большую тему безопасности языковых моделей. Завтра пройдемся по лабе Gandalf и на практике отработаем техники Prompt Injection. Материалы: 1) https://gandalf.lakera.ai/baseline 2) https://snyk.io/articles/understanding-prompt-injection-techniques-challenges-and-risks/ 3) https://github.com/OWASP/www-project-ai-testing-guide/blob/5c6d357e2290e8c81ab7e6673950e978e1b83604/PDFGenerator

👍5

17 Jul 2026, 17:55 UTC252 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Organisation meeting Just as open as all the previous meets. Come and make sandb0x greater! 🕗 18.07.2026, Saturday, 19:00 📍 Merab Aleksidze Street, 1 💰 Donation welcome 👅 Lang: ru/en 👤 Host: @dappy Schedule: New space planning & brainstorm Non-commercial legal entity planning

👨‍💻1

14 Jul 2026, 10:38 UTC278 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ST: Security Tuesday. Mental Edition #4 Экспериментальный формат терапевтической группы в Sandbox, в рамках которого мы будем делиться и обсуждать лучшие практики хорошего самочувствия. Сегодня поговорим про перфекционизм. Что это такое, почему может возникать, что можно (а нужно ли) с этим поделать. Предполагается групповая работа за круглым столом, где каждый/каждая сможет поделиться своими идеями. 🕗 14.07.2026

🔥2

8 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC327 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🕗 10.07.2026, Friday, с 14:00 до вечера 📍 Merab Aleksidze Street, 1 👅 Lang: ru 💰Donations welcome 👤 Org: @neopurrr 👤 Host: @dappy Внезапно будем учиться делать макияж! 💅💄💋 (базовые техники, стрелки, etc.) Приходите с косметичками, если их у вас нет - у нас обязательно что-то найдется для вас, все покажем и расскажем :3

💅12❤‍🔥3🔥21💘1🤯1

4 Jul 2026, 05:06 UTC317 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Орг встреча! Такая же открытая, как и все другие. Приходи делать сендбокс лучше. 🕗 04.07.2026, Saturday, 19:00 📍 Merab Aleksidze Street, 1 💰 Donation welcome 👅 Lang: ru/en 👤 Host: @pvl_wtf Повестка встречи: 1) Обсудить возможность переезда @dappy @pvl_wtf Закинуть тему можно здесь: https://t.me/sandbox_space/166

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sandbox_events. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 644,531 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sandbox events” (@sandbox_events), 381 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sandbox_events.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.