Channel
@sancho_sanchess
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
286subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001603349882 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sancho_sanchess |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sancho_sanchess |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 286 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 287 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 287 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 288 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (4 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 269 |
| Reactions total | 52 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
52 reactions across 5 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5267368649391358376 | 19 | 36.5% | |
| custom 5357143060834699181 | 10 | 19.2% | |
| custom 5201959746332020337 | 6 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5258459491355085163 | 5 | 9.62% | |
| custom 5190948386487942042 | 3 | 5.77% | |
| custom 5341804813497671599 | 2 | 3.85% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 3.85% | |
| custom 5202147307553837458 | 1 | 1.92% | |
| custom 5785094826273803723 | 1 | 1.92% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.92% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.92% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 1.92% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вообще лес конечно же везде хорош, просто я люблю деревья и горы, что уж там))) в конце августа поездка в Казахстан и большие планы на походы и на подышать!!
custom 52673686493913583764🎉1custom 52019597463320203371custom 53571430608346991811
В одном из моих рабочих проектов я создаю материалы о ЮАР, сейчас вот почти доделала маршрут по Кейптауну за 5 дней и поймала себя на мысли, как же хочется взять собачек и прогулять по нашему с Греем любимому лесу Newlands Forest 🤤🤤🤤 Годжинька бы там кайфонула нереально конечно) И вообще весь район Ньюлендс сильно рекомендую, если будете в Кейпе, его ходить не переходить пешком, любоваться на красивые дома, нереаль…
custom 52673686493913583762custom 53418048134976715992💯1custom 52584594913550851631
Зарисовки из жизни фрилансера и собачьей матери вчера Грей был на улице раз наверное 6, потому что ему не подошел новый корм (попробовали Территорию с Белой рыбой и что-то прям вообще никак, я даже не ожидала такой реакции со стороны ЖКТ). Конечно же я ужасно расстроилась, потому что я смешала в одной пачке упаковку старого и нового корма, благо по 3 кг, не 15)))) Теперь прекрасная смесь отправится машиным родителя…
custom 53571430608346991818custom 52673686493913583766custom 52584594913550851634custom 51909483864879420421custom 52021473075538374581
Жизнь не кино, говорят Я не согласна /вписаться в мой интенсив по ИИ и научиться делать в нем разные классные штуки можно тут, сегодня-завтра еще пускаю, потом всёёё/
custom 52673686493913583763custom 52019597463320203372⚡1🤓1custom 51909483864879420421custom 53571430608346991811
Чтобы жизнь была замечательной, нужно ее замечать ✨💛 В карточках питерские будни
custom 52673686493913583764custom 52019597463320203373💯1custom 51909483864879420421custom 57850948262738037231
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @sancho_sanchess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 70,117 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“пёс знает что происходит” (@sancho_sanchess), 286 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sancho_sanchess.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.