3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 85–86 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 23:45
85
-1
9 Aug 2026, 16:33
86
no change
9 Aug 2026, 15:45
86
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
186.9%
avg views ÷ 85 subscribers
Avg views / post
159
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.726%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
17 (16 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
1,589
Reactions total
6
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 03s
Average length
42s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4
50.0%
🥰
3
37.5%
👍
1
12.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤖 HAFTALIK AI YANGILIKLARI (Avgust, 2026) 🚀
Ushbu haftada Sun’iy Intellekt (AI) sohasida sodir bo‘lgan eng muhim yangiliklar, vositalar va trendlar sharhi:
🎬 1. AI Video va 3D Dizayn: Autodesk Flow Studio yangilanishi
* Yangilik: Autodesk kompaniyasi generatorli AI yordamida video va visual effektlar yaratishni boshqarish uchun Flow Studio platformasida 3D Editor + Canvas interfeysini ishga tushirdi.
* Asosiy …
📲 AI dunyosi tez o'zgarmoqda — siz bundan xabardormisiz?
@FoydaliWebSahifalar — bu O'zbek tilida sun'iy intellekt yangiliklarini kuzatib boradigan kanal.
Bu yerda:
🔹 Dunyodagi eng dolzarb AI yangiliklari
🔹 Foydali veb-saytlar va ilovalar tavsiyalari
🔹 Tushunarli va qisqa formatda taqdimot
Har kuni foydali ma'lumot olishni istasangiz — hoziroq qo'shiling! 👇
@FoydaliWebSahifalar
🎨 3 ta AI modelni bir xil grafik dizayn vazifasida sinab ko'rdim.
Qaysi natija sizga ko'proq yoqdi?
👍 — Nano Banana Pro
❤️ — GPT Image 2
🔥 — Seedream 5 Pro
Ovoz bering va izohlarda sababini yozing. Eng ko'p ovoz olgan model bilan keyingi experimentni qilaman. 🚀
🦞 SanchoAI
Yana bir muvaffaqiyatli loyiha ✅
Mijoz uchun tayyorlangan reklama roligi.
Sizning biznesingiz uchun ham shunday sifatli reklama tayyorlaymiz.
📩 Bog'lanish: @sancho_ai
Bunday ultra-realistik erkak rasmini qanday yaratish mumkin? 👇🏻
Yo'riqnoma:
📌 suzma.ai botiga kiring.
📌 Nano Banana 2 modelini tanlang.
📌 O'zingizning sifatli rasmingizni yuklang.
📌 Tayyor promptni kiriting.
PROMPT
📌 9:16 formatni tanlang.
Tayyor! ✅
Mijoz uchun tayyorlangan reklama roligi.
Ishonch bildirganingiz uchun rahmat! 🤝
Sizning biznesingiz uchun ham kreativ va professional reklama videolari tayyorlaymiz.
📩 @sancho_ai
Bunday creativ videoni qanday yaratish mumkin? 👇🏻
Yo‘riqnoma:
SuzmaAi botga kiring.
Model sifatida Seedance 2.0 ni tanlang.
O‘zingizning va qush rasmini yuklang va tayyorlagan promptni kiriting.
PROMPT
16:9 formatni tanlang, va 15 soniya davomiylikni tanlang.
Tayyor! ✅
AI dunyosidagi so'nggi yangiliklar
🔹 MiniMax H3: 2K video va ichki stereo ovoz bitta modelda
MiniMax 31-iyul kuni H3 ni ishga tushirdi — u matn, rasm, video va audioni yagona kontekst sifatida o'qib, 4 dan 15 soniyagacha 2K video va tabiiy stereo ovoz qaytaradi. Ilgari text-to-video, image-to-video, referens va montaj alohida modellarda bajarilar edi, H3 bularni bitta tizimga jamladi: bitta so'rovda 9 tagacha rasm,…
AI dunyosidagi so'nggi yangiliklar
🔹 Anthropic modellari test paytida uchta real kompaniyani buzib kirgan
Anthropic o'z modellari kibertahlil sinovlari davomida uchta begunoh kompaniyaning tizimiga kirib ketganini tan oldi. Sabab — sandbox tayyorlagan tashqi hamkor modellarga xato tarzda internetga chiqish huquqini bergan. Bir hodisada model soxta nishon bilan bir xil nomdagi haqiqiy kompaniyani buzib, bir necha yu…
Endi qo’rqmasdan rasman desak bo’ladimi?
Eng kuchli video model 🇨🇳 Seedance 2.5 taqdim qilindi.
Dreamina plarformada ishlatib ko’rishingiz mumkin 👇
https://dreamina.capcut.com/ai-tool/home
🦑@sancho_aii
Kadr ortidagi sehr: Tasavvurni voqelikka aylantirish. ✨
Har bir kadr, har bir effekt va o'tishlar tomoshabinni voqealar rivojiga to'liq sho'ng'itish uchun sinchkovlik bilan ishlandi. Oddiy hayotiy lahzalardan tortib, fantastik olamlargacha bo'lgan sayohat — bu mening navbatdagi ijodiy ishim!
📽️ Video muallifi: Sancho 💬 Fikringiz men uchun muhim! Videoga baho bering va do'stlaringiz bilan ulashing.
UGC format — bugungi kunda sotuvlarning eng asosiy drayveri! 🚀
Brendingiz sumka, kiyim yoki aksessuarlarini xuddi shunday hayotiy, estetik va e'tiborni tortuvchi kadrlar bilan brendingiz sahifasiga joylang.
💡 Biz siz uchun tayyor sotuvchi video kontent va ssenariylarni taqdim etamiz.
📩 Aynan sizning mahsulotingiz uchun maxsus video tayyorlashimizni xohlasangiz,
Direct’ga yozing!
@sancho_ai
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @sancho_aii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 352,947 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SanchoAi | Ai Video Creation” (@sancho_aii), 85 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sancho_aii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.