Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

💡Samuel Eckert💡

@samueleckert

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

53,735subscribers

-107 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001185232550
TypeChannel
Username@samueleckert
Description‼️ Offizieller Kanal von Samuel Eckert ‼️ 🎬 Rumble: 👉🏼 rumble.com/c/samueleckert 🔴 DLive: 👉🏼 dlive.tv/samueleckert 🎥 Odysee: 👉🏼 odysee.com/@samueleckert 🌐 Webseite: 👉🏼 samueleckert.net 📹 YouTube: 👉🏼bit.ly/3zLuJJ1
Created6 May 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/samueleckert

Growth

53,73553,84253,788.56 August 2026 — 53,842 subscribers7 August 2026 — 53,826 subscribers8 August 2026 — 53,811 subscribers9 August 2026 — 53,792 subscribers10 August 2026 — 53,778 subscribers10 August 2026 — 53,767 subscribers12 August 2026 — 53,749 subscribers12 August 2026 — 53,735 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -107. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53,719–53,858 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:4453,735-14
12 Aug 2026, 01:5253,749-18
10 Aug 2026, 23:3353,767-11
10 Aug 2026, 00:2853,778-14
9 Aug 2026, 02:0153,792-19
8 Aug 2026, 00:5253,811-15
7 Aug 2026, 04:1053,826-16
6 Aug 2026, 09:4653,842first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 July 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,070
Videos
359
Links
2,430

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 57s
Average length
2m 59s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9,706 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9,46497.5%
👎2422.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,706reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2023 to 9 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Jan 2025, 17:07 UTC≈61,500 views482 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @NextLevelOriginalPhoto

💥 RKI bestätigt: Keine Daten zur Ursachenforschung von COVID-19 vorhanden 🦠 Das Robert-Koch-Institut (RKI) ist gemäß § 4 IfSG gesetzlich dazu verpflichtet, die Ursachen übertragbarer Krankheiten zu erforschen. Das SARS-CoV-2-Referenzgenom "Wuhan-Hu-1" ist zentral für die COVID-19-Forschung. Es bildete die weltweite Grundlage für PCR-Primer, Antigen-Tests, Impfstoffe (z. B. BioNTech, Moderna), Antikörpertherapien un

👍466👎16

25 Aug 2024, 11:18 UTC≈80,000 views518 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @NextLevelOriginalPhoto

👉NEXT LEVEL Telegram 💬Kontakt 👉NL Website

👍506👎12

4 Aug 2024, 15:47 UTC≈103,000 views621 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔍 RKI-Files: Wo ist der Virus-Nachweis? Eine Chronologie: - 06.02.2020: Virus von Charité erhalten, aktuell in Anzüchtung, vorerst informell - 08.01.2021: Virusanzüchtung ist nicht so leicht - 11.01.2021: Eine Virusanzüchtung wird derzeit im hauseigenen Labor versucht - 19.02.2021: Anzüchtung ist schwierig - 24.04.2021: Keine Virusanzucht aus Ct < 30-Proben möglich - Danach gab es keine protokollierten Informa

👍612👎9

27 Apr 2024, 10:50 UTC≈68,400 views432 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @NextLevelOriginal

🦠Verdacht: NOROVIRUS Aktuell geht ein Ereignis durch die Medien: In Stuttgart klagen nach einem Fest mehr als 700 Menschen über Magen-Darm-Beschwerden. 👉 Der Verdacht: NOROVIRUS Die Idee des NOROVIRUS Wenn Sie auf die Suche gehen, woher die Idee der Noroviren kommt – über die offiziell behauptet wird, dass diese mit Erbrochenem und Stuhlgang ausgeschieden werden – landen Sie bei einer Studie der US-Armee aus dem Ja

👍415👎17

24 Mar 2024, 15:34 UTC≈67,300 views868 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @multipolar_magazin

Die von unserem Magazin freigeklagten Protokolle des Krisenstabs des Robert Koch-Instituts (RKI) werden nun für alle zugänglich gemacht. Die mehr als 200 Dokumente sind in erheblichem Umfang durch das RKI geschwärzt. Gegen die Schwärzungen klagen wir aktuell. Wir laden alle interessierten Journalisten zur Mitrecherche ein. ➠ Artikel lesen alle bisherigen Beiträge: Meldungen, Artikel, tägliche Hinweise, Literatur.

👍859👎9

20 Mar 2024, 10:11 UTC≈78,000 views336 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

- Interview Trailer mit Samuel Eckert - ❗MORGEN IST DER GROßE KONGRESS-START: BUTTERFLY SUMMIT 2.0 ❗ Erlebe die Vielzahl an großartigen Interviews von 70 Top-Experten wie SAMUEL ECKERT, Dr. Carola Javid-Kistel, Dr. Bodo Schiffmann, Roger Bittel, Stefan Magnet, Friedemann Mack, Andreas Kalcker, Dr. Michael Spitzbart, Sara Bennett, Beate Bahner, Kai Stuht und vielen weiteren Highlights 👉 vom 21.3.-30.3.2024 Nach der

👍321👎15

27 Jan 2024, 10:58 UTC≈84,700 views539 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @NextLevelOriginalPhoto

Viruslast im Abwasser: Reaktion des RKI zeigt Bedeutungslosigkeit der Ergebnisse Antworten sinngemäß übersetzt: 1. Unklare PCR-Primer: Unkenntnis über eingesetzte Primer untergraben die Glaubwürdigkeit der Ergebnisse. 2. Inkonsistente Primer: Unterschiedliche Primer verhindern verlässliche statistische Vergleiche. 3. Kurze Sequenzen: Analysen basieren auf minimalen Sequenz-Abschnitten, was keine Rückschlüsse zulä

👍531👎8

27 Dec 2023, 08:09 UTC≈88,800 views310 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @NextLevelOriginalVideo

NL QuiX: Genetik - Noch wirrer als die Virologie Genetik, oft als wissenschaftlicher Grundpfeiler dargestellt – von Herkunftsbestimmung, Impfstoffen, Viren, Blutgruppen, DNA-Tests bis zur forensischen Analyse. Sie wird zur Erklärung von Vererbung und "krankhaften" Genen verwendet. Selbst in der Landwirtschaft wird sie als Werkzeug behauptet, um bestimmte Eigenschaften zu erzielen. Ganz gerissene und kreative Wissen

👍296👎14

28 Nov 2023, 11:34 UTC≈76,800 views412 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @NextLevelOriginal

Universitätsleiter Prof. Streit sinngemäß: So ist das Spiel der Virologie 😅 👉 Video (Tacheles 10) Das behauptete Genom von SARS-CoV-2 wurde von einem einzelnen Patienten in China abgeleitet, dessen Virusstruktur laut chinesischen Wissenschaftlern nie isoliert wurde. Wie auch Prof. Streit anmerkt, hat sich die wissenschaftliche Gemeinschaft an dieses hypothetische Modell zu halten, da in der Welt der Virologie offen

👍399👎13

18 Nov 2023, 11:48 UTC≈72,100 views504 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @NextLevelOriginal

Sechs Monate später, und immer noch kein Beweis – Was verschweigt die Kritikergruppe rund um Prof. Ulrike Kämmerer❓ Ausbleibende Beweisführung: Die Situation nach einem halben Jahr Sechs Monate sind vergangen, seit wir auf der Suche nach Klarheit in der Diskussion um die Virusexistenz an Prof. Ulrike Kämmerer appelliert haben, ihren Beweis zu veröffentlichen. Trotz der Behauptungen, die in der Sitzung des Corona-Aus

👍489👎15

17 Nov 2023, 21:28 UTC≈60,000 views706 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @NextLevelOriginalPhoto

Enthüllt: Warum Prof. Ulrike Kämmerer den Virusbeweis nicht vorlegen wird❗️ Mit großem Tamtam angekündigt und von drei Anwälten unterstützt - nach über einem Jahr des Wartens bleibt am Ende nur Stille und ein DIN A4 Deckblatt Prof. Kämmerer behauptet, das SARS-CoV-2-Genom sei eindeutig nachgewiesen. Doch ihr Mitautor Dr. Pieter Borger - [Link zur Studie] widerspricht logisch schlüssig: 🗣 "Der Spaß ist natürlich, d

👍698👎8

23 Oct 2023, 19:04 UTC≈94,200 views1,829 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ein guter Mann ist von uns gegangen. Unermüdlich für die Wahrheit eingestanden, mit seiner ganz eigenen Art. Ein ruhiger und nachdenklicher Mensch, dem ich immer gerne zugehört habe. Ich hatte die Ehre, Gunnar persönlich kennengelernt zu haben. Ich weiss, wie sehr die Finsternis, die auf dieser Welt herrscht, bedrücken kann. Der Körper ist das Spiegelbild des Geistes und die Dunkelheit dieser Welt schwer zu ertrage

👍1,820👎9

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @samueleckert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 402,147 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💡Samuel Eckert💡” (@samueleckert), 53,735 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/samueleckert.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.