Channel
@PCR_Test_ein_Betrug_Fragezeichen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001230872813 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PCR_Test_ein_Betrug_Fragezeichen |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PCR_Test_ein_Betrug_Fragezeichen |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:49 | 3 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 3 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 October 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 18 months. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Alles Schauspiel‼️ Sogenannte Experten & Virologen werden in Biohazard Anzügen auf einer Coronastation interviewt. Doch der Kameramann, macht einen Fehler und filmt den Produzenten des Clips im Hintergrund ohne Schutz und Maske der relaxt der Lügengeschichte zusieht, die dann in den Massenmedien verbreitet wird um das Volk gehirnzuwaschen. Offensichtlich sind TV Teams des Mainstreams vor dem Virus sicher😂: https://ww…
Dr. Mark Bailey - Es existiert kein Isolat vom Coronavirus❗️ 💬 Die zentralen Aussagen von DR. Mark Bailey: ✅ Es existiert kein wissenschaftlicher Nachweis für ein krankmachendes Virus ✅ Virologen missbrauchen den Begriff Isolat/Isolierung ✅ Virologen haben die Definition "Isolat/Isolierung" verändert ✅ Virologen prüfen nicht, ob irgendwas isoliert wurde 👉 Hier zum ganzen Interview 👉 Zusammenschnitt diverser Fo…
⚠️❗️CDC-Direktorin sagt, sie verlangen am Ende der Quarantäne keine Tests, weil der PCR-Test bis zu 12 Wochen noch positiv bleiben kann. Sie müssten die Leute dann sehr lange in Isolation behalten. WIE BITTE ? Der Drosten-PCR-Test kann also positiv ausschlagen, obwohl seit Monaten keine Infektiosität mehr vorliegt?? Galt das nicht früher immer als Verschwörungstheorie? Warum hat Drosten diese Info verheimlicht und …
https://giftamhimmel.de/explosiv-cdc-erkennt-pcr-test-nicht-laenger-als-zulaessige-methode-zum-nachweis-bestaetigter-covid-19-faelle-an/
Roche: Schnelltest unterscheidet Corona und Grippe | APOTHEKE ADHOC https://www.apotheke-adhoc.de/nachrichten/detail/coronavirus/roche-schnelltest-unterscheidet-corona-und-grippe-welche-virusinfektion-ist-es/
Stew Peters || CDC Pandemie der Geimpften: CDC gibt zu, dass es keine Beweise für die Ausbreitung von Covid bei Ungeimpften gibt Quelle, 🥣, https://traugott-ickeroth.com/liveticker/
https://m.focus.de/politik/ausland/weltweite-sorge-vor-neuer-mutation-verlaeufe-bislang-extrem-mild-suedafrika-veraergert-ueber-drakonische-omikron-massnahmen_id_24468472.html
https://odysee.com/@LongXXvids:c/Mike-Adams---where-to-find-the-isolate-:6
🛑 DIE URUGUAYISCHE REGIERUNG HAT DURCH DAS GESUNDHEITSMINISTERIUM PER GERICHTSBESCHLUSS DIE NICHTEXISTENZ VON SARS COV2 COVID ANERKANNT.🛑 @Corona_Reset
https://telegra.ph/PCR-Testst%C3%A4bchen--das-Gift-in-deiner-Nase-10-20
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @PCR_Test_ein_Betrug_Fragezeichen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@PCR_Test_ein_Betrug_Fragezeichen named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PCR Test ein Betrug?” (@PCR_Test_ein_Betrug_Fragezeichen), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PCR_Test_ein_Betrug_Fragezeichen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.