samakichh🎪 pinned a photo

Channel
samakichh🎪
@samakichh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
907subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001968839341 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @samakichh |
| Description | нᴇ будь ᴛᴀᴋᴏй, ᴋᴀᴋᴏй ᴛы ᴋᴀжᴇɯьᴄя ᴛᴀᴋиʍ,ᴋᴏᴛᴏᴩыʍ ᴋᴀжᴇᴛᴄя, чᴛᴏ ᴛы ᴛᴀᴋᴀя, ᴋᴀᴋᴏй ᴛы ᴋᴀжᴇɯьᴄя, ᴋᴏᴦдᴀ ᴛы ᴋᴀжᴇɯьᴄя нᴇ ᴛᴀᴋᴏй, ᴋᴀᴋᴏй быᴧᴀ бы, ᴇᴄᴧи б быᴧᴀ нᴇ ᴛᴀᴋᴏй. 🕰 анонка- http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=OMBIlX6GwU6blWZ связь: @smkchh |
| Created | 16 June 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/samakichh |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 907 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 907 | first reading |
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 25.5%
- avg views ÷ 907 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 232
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 18.2%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (3 August 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,621 |
| Reactions total | 295 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,320
- Videos
- ≈12
- Links
- ≈86
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
295 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 156 | 52.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 55 | 18.6% | |
| 🍓 | 27 | 9.15% | |
| 💘 | 18 | 6.10% | |
| 💋 | 16 | 5.42% | |
| custom 5337122268352904755 | 14 | 4.75% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 1.36% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 0.678% | |
| 😇 | 2 | 0.678% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.339% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 295reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 7 we hold a reading for · 14%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @samakichh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
делаю доченьке нормальный референс
❤36❤🔥16custom 53371222683529047558💘5😇1
🤩🤩 🤩🤩 ⭐️🤩 🤩🤩🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🤩🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟🤩🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟🤩🤩 ⭐️боже, ребята, я вас так люблю. Вы прекрасная аудитория))🫶 Конечно хочу выразить лучи поддержке моей прекрасной даме сердца и двум близким кентам, уж они то знают о ком я)🖕 Да, к 16ти годам надо было чего то да достичь в творчестве, но это уже вам решать: хороша ли я для своих лет или нет. Разумеется, буду благодарна репостам этого поста, поздравлением и пере…
❤🔥10❤5custom 53371222683529047555💘1🕊1
в комментарии кину спидпейнт (на пять минут....) 🌟 буду рада репостам!!
❤15💘4❤🔥2💋2
File, posted without a caption
❤8❤🔥5🍓2💋1
🌙🤩🌰🌫 I fell down to Earth From a hundred miles away and somehow I still make it work But it's overrated and somehow played out 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 #смкчарт у меня есть небольшой хэдканон на то, что рунику плохо знаком концепт человеческих эмоций, поэтому он выражает их по-другому и немного странно
❤50🍓15💋11💘5❤🔥3🔥1😇1custom 53371222683529047551
никогда, НИКОГДА не болейте летом. я серьёзно ☠️ авторов этих чудесных деток можно найти тут —> samakichh, Flos_Arbor, VikDis, MUSHROOMCOFFEE, TrellyJelly выкладываю вторую порцию атак, мне очень понравился этот ивент!!! жду следующего года очень!! надеюсь, не помру на половине 😍 работы без надписей можете посмотреть ТУТ! #фанарт
❤12❤🔥4🔥3🍓1💘1
что-то крутое грядет #скетч #традиш #вип
❤30❤🔥15🍓9🐳2💋2💘2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @samakichh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 54,209 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 39 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@alexanderfromkarpat · 4231 postFafiyyyy
@Fafiyyyy · 661 postFedor
@FedorHuita · 391 postIVANTILL ZINE | Stars between our wounds
@ivtizine · 3851 postкаракуртик
@k6pakypt · 2201 postKitani
@kitani11 · 5471 postквакль-бродякль
@kvakl_brodyakl · 1651 postслава упавшая на марс
@marsf111eld · 2421 postМил Шмидт
@milshmidt · 1191 postMNTCHNK
@mntchnk · 181 postmr.sall1m
@MrSaallll · 1511 postкорпус инструмента 🦄
@papervibeslair · 3331 post✴️ Proxima ✴️
@Proximahere · 601 postRENKʼs universe
@RenkVuniverse · 2691 postSOVA03
@s04va · 8151 postшаня1289
@shanya1289 · 3051 postShiga
@Shiga_channel · 4,0511 postМаковое поле
@sonnamakovompole · 2501 posttimplslater
@timplslaterr · 721 postКалевала
@verresskk · 4171 postVinil Record🍄༉
@VinilRecord · 2951 postОмар малюе
@wierd0marru33 · 1161 postsars
@wwwsars · 2371 post'shiisha'
@yasha_shishi · 1401 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“samakichh🎪” (@samakichh), 907 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/samakichh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.