Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

lololoshka confessions ✧

@loloconfessions

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,220subscribers

-57 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001909722135
TypeChannel
Username@loloconfessions
Created30 May 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/loloconfessions

Growth

9,2209,2779,248.56 August 2026 — 9,277 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,277 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,274 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,248 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,220 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,211–9,286 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:149,220-28
9 Aug 2026, 19:329,248-26
6 Aug 2026, 18:019,274-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:179,277no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:009,277first reading

Engagement

95 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.00%
avg views ÷ 9,220 subscribers
Avg views / post
277
95 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
95
of 95 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 94 of 95 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held95 (6 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total26,290
Reactions total1,735
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 11s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,735 reactions across 94 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥59334.2%
56732.7%
🔥1589.11%
💘985.65%
🤩885.07%
🍓482.77%
🥰221.27%
🐳211.21%
😇191.10%
💊170.98%
👍130.749%
💋130.749%
😁130.749%
👏110.634%
🎃90.519%
🕊90.519%
🤔70.403%
😨60.346%
🌭40.231%
👾40.231%
6 further kinds150.865%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 94 of the 95 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,735reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 95 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @loloconfessions. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 95 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC131 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Хочу немного похвастаться своим кавински Тгк: https://t.me/nyni_mak @loloconfessions

❤‍🔥112

Signed предложка для ЛОКФ

12 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC163 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Такой вот Дилан Тгк @medunok155 @loloconfessions

7❤‍🔥1

Signed предложка для ЛОКФ

12 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC159 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Эбардо. @Meyanch @loloconfessions

8❤‍🔥1

Signed предложка для ЛОКФ

12 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC162 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

#Лололошка тгк: @Dian_Dew35 @loloconfessions

5❤‍🔥1

Signed предложка для ЛОКФ

12 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC158 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

автор комикса октябрь – автор озвучки @loloconfessions

5❤‍🔥1

Signed предложка для ЛОКФ

12 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC162 viewsread 12 August 2026

Привет лофд нация, не могли бы вы по доброте душевной скинуть в комментарии канал новой сценаристки? Не смог найти ее @loloconfessions

Signed предложка для ЛОКФ

12 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC176 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

тгк: https://t.me/k6pakypt @loloconfessions

8❤‍🔥1

Signed предложка для ЛОКФ

12 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC182 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Милый артик по моей прекрасной семье. 🥺😒🐩 Мой канал... KRISPI 🤩 📱 https://t.me/Elenveil_artist 📱 https://t.me/Elenveil_artist 📱 https://t.me/Elenveil_artist Будем вам рады! 🤩 @loloconfessions

10❤‍🔥6

Signed кмюх

12 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC181 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Рин в виде браслета! ТГК: @ejidi_F0rter @loloconfessions @loloconfessions

❤‍🔥8

Signed предложка для ЛОКФ

12 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC177 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Привет я уже жёлтый У меня есть канал который я с подружкой вместе там рисуем, ну вы там можете глазком глянуть, хш Ну канал мб чуть щп....😭😓 https://t.me/kakaski99347 @loloconfessions

💋11❤‍🔥4💊43

Signed предложка для ЛОКФ

12 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC194 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩 🌟 👻👻👻 🎀 🤩Ꮲᴀйᴀ нᴇбᴩᴇжнᴏ ᴨᴏхᴧᴏᴨᴀᴧᴀ ᴇᴦᴏ ᴨᴏ ᴨᴧᴇчу, ᴨᴇᴩᴇʙᴏдя ʙɜᴦᴧяд нᴀ ʙᴏɜᴧюбᴧᴇннᴏᴦᴏ, — Ꭺ ɜнᴀᴇɯь чᴛᴏ? Ꮯɸᴏᴛᴏᴦᴩᴀɸиᴩуй ʍᴇня нᴀ ɸᴏнᴇ ɜᴀᴋᴀᴛᴀ. 🦷🥺 ˖⁠꒰Читать тут⑅⁠꒱ 🌟🌟 🤩 ➖➖ ⭐ 〽️Ꮻбᴧᴏжᴋу ᴩиᴄᴏʙᴀᴧᴀ — @OfilK6 〽️ Ꭺʙᴛᴏᴩ ɜᴀᴩиᴄᴏʙᴋи — @Floskawr @loloconfessions

🔥62❤‍🔥2🍓2🐳1👏1😇1

Signed кмюх

12 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC200 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Жанр: повседневность, учебные заведения Рейтинг: Nc-17 Пейринг: Ровоам Кэлхун/Престон. Упоминание! Жаклин/Шэрон. Ссылка на фанфик. «Твоя "школьница "» Вышла третья глава https://ficbook.net/readfic/019fe204-9be9-7aaf-8451-ce4737946c2d/ @SanceKK @loloconfessions

5🔥2❤‍🔥1

Signed предложка для ЛОКФ

Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @loloconfessions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 276,843 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Linch 🦆
@e_linch · 153,083
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 12 August 2026
Никита Берг
@mysticsberg · 239,545
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“lololoshka confessions ✧” (@loloconfessions), 9,220 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/loloconfessions.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.