Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Блондевиль

@salvioniq

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

49subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003547947869
TypeChannel
Username@salvioniq
DescriptionБьюти, фешн и остальные словечки для герлс
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 20 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/salvioniq

Growth

4913 Aug 2026, 20:50 — 49 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 21:02 — 49 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 20:5013 Aug 2026, 21:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48–50 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 21:0249no change
13 Aug 2026, 20:5049first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 20 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
782
Videos
2
Links
61

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

67 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52606608038282072652435.8%
custom 53481846309336148271725.4%
custom 61858463318991207561217.9%
custom 522443240249913093268.96%
custom 535056885747393568357.46%
custom 520176547207630911934.48%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2026 to 25 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
14.3%
1 of 7 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
88.0
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
33.0
over 6 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
25H8d7vbP8SRTvJ4Ake3W8125 March 202625 March 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2026 to 25 March 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

25 Mar 2026, 08:31 UTC88 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Advertisementerid 25H8d7vbP8SRTvJ4Ake3W8Photo

Обед начинаем с нового боксика 🍏

custom 52606608038282072656custom 52017654720763091193custom 52244324024991309322

24 Mar 2026, 13:28 UTC90 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Выкидываю беспроводные наушники…

custom 52606608038282072655custom 61858463318991207563custom 52244324024991309322

23 Mar 2026, 11:19 UTC45 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Девочки, SOS! Я в 19 году купила себе мист от Виктории Сикрет, лимитный. Ну естественно - тщетно было его искать где-то. А вы представьте, наносишь запах и ты погружаешься в 2019 год… И сегодня услышала аромат, который 100% схож. Делюсь! AUSTRALIAN GOLD sea salt & sandalwood На озоне он подешевле, но делюсь ссылкой с ЗЯ 🐚

custom 53481846309336148273custom 52244324024991309322custom 53505688574739356831

23 Mar 2026, 05:33 UTC36 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Есть только 2 праздника в году, которые я жду с большим наслаждением. Это Новый год и Пасха🐥 Уже насохраняла себе референсов💛

custom 53481846309336148274custom 52606608038282072653custom 61858463318991207561

22 Mar 2026, 09:18 UTC33 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

👣 КАК НАБРАТЬ ПРАВИЛЬНУЮ МАССУ И НАКОНЕЦ ПОЛУЧИТЬ ЯГОДИЦЫ Многие девушки хотят округлость в нужных местах, но боятся «поправиться». Разбираем, как набрать массу так, чтобы она шла туда, куда нужно. Почему ягодицы не растут без набора массы? Ягодицы — это мышца. А мышца растёт только при двух условиях: достаточная нагрузка + профицит калорий. Без «строительного материала» тело не может увеличить объём тканей — скольк

custom 53481846309336148274custom 52606608038282072653custom 61858463318991207562

21 Mar 2026, 12:57 UTC31 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Что делаем на этих выходных? ❤️ Выйди на улицу — даже если не хочется Прогулка в куртке и кофе в руках - это уже маленькая победа. Замечай: первые почки, лужи с небом, запах оттаявшей земли. Ранняя весна красива именно так - тихо и без прикрас. ☕ Устрой себе кофейный день Найди кафе, в котором ещё ни разу не была. Возьми что-то новое из меню. Сядь у окна. Просто посиди - без телефона хотя бы первые 10 минут. 📚 Нач

custom 52606608038282072654custom 53505688574739356834custom 61858463318991207563

20 Mar 2026, 15:58 UTC27 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

А мы еще не обсуждали образы с Оскара, присылаю своих любимчиков. Некоторые образы (не включила в подборку) вызывали очень много вопросов....

custom 53481846309336148276custom 52606608038282072653custom 61858463318991207563

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @salvioniq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,224,708 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Блондевиль” (@salvioniq), 49 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salvioniq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.