Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

salut, vera!

@salutverav

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

71subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001689946835
TypeChannel
Username@salutverav
DescriptionО книгах, кино, музыке ❤️
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/salutverav

Growth

717 August 2026 — 71 subscribers9 August 2026 — 71 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 70–72 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 23:1671no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:4971first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 21 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
197
Videos
23
Links
17

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 44s
Average length
1m 44s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

93 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2830.1%
😢1617.2%
😁1314.0%
👏99.68%
🔥88.60%
👀55.38%
🕊44.30%
💔33.23%
🤔22.15%
🤨22.15%
🍾11.08%
😱11.08%
🥰11.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 10 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 May 2026, 11:04 UTC64 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вот так теперь будет выглядеть Елена Троянская, чистокровная гречанка, в новом фильме Кристофера Нолана «Одиссея». Именно из-за нее начнется Троянская война. Девушка красивая, бесспорно, но всё-таки, как мне кажется, не очень похожа на златокудрую Елену Спартанскую. А что думаете вы? Стоит ли подбирать актеров под образ?

😁6👀3😢3💔2

25 Mar 2026, 09:53 UTC127 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Какая Наташа лучше?

  1. Одри Хепберн16%
  2. Людмила Савельева64%
  3. Моран Худ0%
  4. Клеманс Поэзи0%
  5. Лили Джеймс12%
  6. Полина Гухман8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Mar 2026, 06:23 UTC105 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Кто для вас лучшая Наташа Ростова?) 1. Одри Хепберн (фильм 1956 года) 2. Людмила Савельева (фильм Бондарчука) 3. Мораг Худ (фильм 1972 года) 4. Клеманс Поэзи (фильм 2007 года) 5. Лили Джеймс (фильм 2016 года) 6. Полина Гухман (новый фильм Андреасяна). Премьера ленты запланирована на 18 февраля 2027 года

2🤨2🥰1

4 Mar 2026, 13:52 UTC122 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

К стыду своему, испытываю легкое злорадство: наконец-то не только учителя русского сдают по два экзамена в год) Как относитесь к тому, что теперь допуск к экзаменам в девятом классе лежит через знание истории? Экзамен устный) сдали бы сами такой сейчас или тогда?) ❤️ - конечно, нужно! 🥲 - я бы не сдал

10😢7

17 Feb 2026, 17:22 UTC123 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Придумывала темы итоговых проектов для десятого класса, вот несколько из них :) Толстой в TikTok: как бы выглядели ролики по «Войне и миру»? Литературные персонажи в компьютерных играх: как бы выглядел квест с участием Чичикова или Базарова? Герои Гоголя в Telegram-каналах: кто бы на что подписывался? Литературные мемы: как классика становится вирусной. Интерактивная карта литературных сражений. Военный плейлист: муз

7👏5

5 Feb 2026, 07:21 UTC126 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @strelets_molodecPhoto

Где купить «гусарский» жакет? Roseville, 49 000 руб. Легендарный жакет бренда «Щелкунчик» хорошо будет смотреться не только в театре. Его вполне можно надеть и в офис, с базовыми синими джинсами. Aline, 59 000 руб. Бархатный жакет – идеал на вечер. Можно сочетать с классическими брюками или мини шортами. Selfmade, 19 990 руб. Жакет из шоколадного сатина почти распродан. Но за ним стоит погоняться – выглядит очень

4👀1🔥1

5 Feb 2026, 07:21 UTC100 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Наконец-то в моду входит одежда, которая устраивает мой вкус как у гусара 1812 года 😄

4🍾1🔥1

1 Feb 2026, 13:49 UTC123 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Итак, приготовила для вас тру-крайм из мира музыкальной классики 🤘 Часть 1. Гайдн aka всадник без головы 💀 Великий Йозеф Гайдн - бесспорный гений классической эпохи в западной музыке, друг Моцарта, учитель Бетховена. 31 мая 1809 года композитор отправился в мир иной. Похороны были скромны: война, да и покой маэстро длился недолго… На сцену вышел дуэт «учёных»: Иоганн Петер — коллекционер черепов (да‑да, такое хобби

🔥6👏3👀1🤔1

25 Jan 2026, 13:53 UTC94 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

На просторах вб) «Для интеллигентного интерьера» 🤠 отзывы отдельную радость доставили) А как часто вы покупаете книги, чтобы они просто красиво стояли?)

😁71👏1💔1😱1

21 Jan 2026, 05:47 UTC111 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @infomoscow24Video

«Я не работаю в школе — я живу там». Учитель математики, которого обожали тысячи школьников, умер в 30 лет. Кирилл Кириченко вёл блог о своей работе. Его читали сотни тысяч подписчиков и ценили за креатив и нестандартный подход к работе. Педагог продолжал общаться с любимой аудиторией даже в больнице с тяжелой пневмонией. 🆗 Подписаться на Москва 24 / Наши каналы / Новости в MAX

😢5🕊3

21 Jan 2026, 05:47 UTC97 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Царствия небесного Кириллу, удивительному человеку, настоящему учителю. Ещё один повод задуматься о своей профессии и (не)уходе из неё.

🕊1🤔1😢1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @salutverav. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Mar 2026, 09:53 UTCAnonymous Poll25 voters

Какая Наташа лучше?

  1. Одри Хепберн16%
  2. Людмила Савельева64%
  3. Моран Худ0%
  4. Клеманс Поэзи0%
  5. Лили Джеймс12%
  6. Полина Гухман8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 10 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“salut, vera!” (@salutverav), 71 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salutverav.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.