Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Салют, это Марк!

@salutmarkus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

278subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002062556339
TypeChannel
Username@salutmarkus
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/salutmarkus

Growth

2787 Aug 2026, 03:47 — 278 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:10 — 278 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:477 Aug 2026, 19:10
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 277–279 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 19:10278no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:47278first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 20 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
83.9%
avg views ÷ 278 subscribers
Avg views / post
233
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held12 (20 March 202627 July 2026)
Views total933
Reactions total49
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

77 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥3039.0%
2532.5%
🔥1013.0%
😁45.19%
🌚33.90%
👍22.60%
💯22.60%
💘11.30%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 17:20 UTC175 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Работа с Росатомом запущена 🔥 Сегодня с командой что-то невозможное сделали: за сутки решили все вопросы по отправке партии в Мурманск для проведения работ на ПАТЭС «Академик Ломоносов», а срок поставки у нас до утра среды был: нужно было принять партию, подготовить к отправке, решить вопрос с логистикой и документами. Должны уложиться в срок Переговоры вели последние месяцев 8 Для нас это «вау-новость», поскольк

❤‍🔥16🔥74💘1

24 Jul 2026, 11:05 UTC215 viewsread 7 August 2026

Про нас можно в 6-м блоке почитать)

24 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC217 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @univertechpredPhoto

⚡️Международные форумы, испытания на крупных предприятиях, коллаборации и новые продукты: собрали самые заметные новости стартапов Платформы! 1️⃣Стартап HemoTech Lab стал победителем премии «СберЗдоровья» в номинации «Технологическое лидерство». Награда вручается за внедрение технологий, меняющих подходы к диагностике, лечению и профилактике заболеваний. Среди ключевых решений компании — неинвазивный глюкометр на ба

2👍1

21 Jul 2026, 07:39 UTC326 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Господа, обращаюсь с просьбой: ищу помещение в черте Санкт-Петербурга для переноса юридического адреса одной из моих компаний. Почему не ищу обычное офисное помещение? 1. Переехать планирую быстро (не физически - мебель не буду перевозить и тд. -, а юридически), до 30 июля, чтобы вовремя подать все документы в налоговую, поскольку наш старый офис закрылся. 2. После переезда, во второй половине августа, планирую за

11😁4🌚3

17 Jun 2026, 17:12 UTC296 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

К слову я далеко не один так думаю)

2

17 Jun 2026, 17:12 UTC401 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheedinorogblogVideo

«Plata за риск»: фильм про новый проект Олега Тинькова и выходцев из «Тинькофф» Посмотрел сегодня фильм про Plata. Это новый мексиканский финтех-проект от Олега Тинькова и бывших топ-менеджеров банка «Тинькофф». Привлеченные финансы уже перевалили за $2 млрд, а последняя оценка — $5 млрд. И вот Андрей Лошак снял документальный фильм про него. На мой взгляд, как некий журналистский материал этот фильм нельзя рассмат

2

17 Jun 2026, 17:01 UTC323 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Спросите меня, где бы я хотел сейчас работать и чтобы эта деятельность отражала масштаб моей мысли, то вот, пожалуйста: Не пожалейте 2 часа своей жизни и изучите историю становления финтеха «PLATA» в Мексике. Наши ребята из России это сделали, вдумайтесь в это - наши это сделали на американском континенте! https://youtu.be/pWwQmikOoqg?is=yGIepl_AGyZ-V4js Я из раза в раз восхищаюсь, какие вещи могут творить наши ре

❤‍🔥5🔥3💯21

17 Jun 2026, 09:13 UTC272 viewsread 7 August 2026

С кем связаться? 1. Написать мне напрямую; 2. Связаться с представителем Энерготехнохаба - Даниилом ( @gubanov_daniil ) и Анной ( @andyadyu ) 3. Податься напрямую здесь: https://grants.techlead.institute/

17 Jun 2026, 09:06 UTC260 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Энерготехнохаб ищет проекту для двух векторов: - университетские стартапы, которые работают вместе с преподавателями и готовы подать заявку в программу https://grants.techlead.institute/ - стартапы магистрантов и аспирантов для подачи заявок на сентябрь в Инкубатор Энерготехнохаба. Это актуально до 19.06 Здесь важно, чтобы стартапы подходили под технологические направления, которые я ранее присылал, от Энерготехн

1

17 Jun 2026, 09:04 UTC254 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всех приветствую, знаю, что от меня много месяцев не было никаких новостей, проживаю непростой период, пока не нашел силы транслировать все события здесь. Но я к вам с небольшими новостями, думаю, что многим из вас откликнется: Нам в свое время хороший буст в развитии стартапа дало участие в Энерготехнохабе (Газпром). По сути это прямой трекшн к заказам внутри всей структуры, если у вас есть стартап, отвечающий инт

❤‍🔥31

20 Mar 2026, 13:25 UTC620 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Венчур в РФ: квази-рынок, диптех и горизонт 10 лет Был на пленарной дискуссии с руководителями венчурных фондов. Делюсь инсайтами, которые показались наиболее ценными для нашего стартап-сообщества. 1. Инвестиционный аппетит у фондов абсолютно понятный: готовы инвестировать в проекты с уже имеющейся выручкой 100 млн+ рублей. Чеки разные - по 0,5 млрд в среднем! 2. Главный парадокс диптеха: Один из спикеров четко с

❤‍🔥61👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @salutmarkus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 648,957 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Салют, это Марк!” (@salutmarkus), 278 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salutmarkus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.