Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Салавейка

Channel

Салавейка

@salaviejka

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

381subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001177584109
TypeChannel
Username@salaviejka
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/salaviejka

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

381384382.57 August 2026 — 384 subscribers7 August 2026 — 384 subscribers22 August 2026 — 382 subscribers16 September 2026 — 381 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 40 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 381–384 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 13:42381-1
22 Aug 2026, 23:29382-2
7 Aug 2026, 06:46384no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:32384first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 October 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

455 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥18941.5%
11525.3%
👍4910.8%
💔4910.8%
🤬255.49%
👏122.64%
🔥51.10%
🤔51.10%
💯30.659%
👎20.44%
🥰10.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 455 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2022 to 5 July 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Jul 2023, 16:04 UTC≈1,880 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mounica_bielFile

File, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥33

5 Jul 2023, 16:04 UTC≈1,840 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mounica_biel

"Для ўсяго ёсьць свой тэрмін, i час для кожнай рэчы пад небам" (Эклезіяста 3:1) ⠀ Нядаўна slounik.org выдаліў з сайту "Расейска-беларускі слоўнік дадатковай лексікі" Зьмітра Саўкі. Чаму гэта важна? Вось трошку інфармацыі пра гэты слоўнік ад спн. Наста Кахан. ⠀ "У свой час беларускі мовазнавец Зміцер Саўка, даследнік і выбітны стыль-рэдактар, узяўся ўкладаць падручны дапаможнік. Прапанаваныя словы там не замяняюць і н

❤‍🔥23🤔4🔥3👍2👏2

21 Feb 2023, 14:55 UTC≈3,590 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

З днём матчынае мовы! 🕊 Салавейка запрашае ўсіх у гульню! ✨ ПРАВІЛЫ: • На выяве першае слова — МАЦІ 🧡 • Першы камэнтатар мае прыдумаць і напісаці слова, што пачынаецца з апошняе літары пачатковага слова (маці) — то бо зь і. • Кажны наступны камэнтар мае пачынацца з апошняе літары пярэдняга камэнтара, ды гэтак далей 😉 • 1 камэнтар — 1 слова па-беларуску. • Словы могуць быці на хоць якую тэму. Гуляйма ж! ☀️ *

❤‍🔥268

13 Jan 2023, 16:01 UTC≈2,370 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔹 Заданьне. Прачытайце ўголас тэкст, зьвярне́це ўвагу на вымаўленьне мяккіх зычных, а таксама — і. Перапішэце паводле клясычнага правапісу („тарашкевіцы“), падчыркне́це ўсе ягоныя асаблівасьці. */*/* ✨ Спяваць на хлеб (уласна бел.) — збіраць міласціну, жабраваць. — Хадзем, Арсень, — рыкнуў Шлык, — абыдземся без гэтага салапёкі, каб ён на хлеб спяваў (У. Караткевіч. Алíва і меч). • У выразе — намёк: жабракі, выпро

❤‍🔥25👍2👎1💯1🤔1🤬1

1 Jan 2023, 20:02 UTC≈2,900 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мой сябра @belarusan начараваў яшчэ адну паштоўку!✨ @belarusan: “Блакітныя рысы — зьмерзлыя рэкі Беларусі. Белае — зьмерзлая зямля Беларусі. Калі прыглядзецца, то можна ўбачыць зьмерзлыя дрэвы Беларусі. Салавейкі паляцелі ў йіншы край і вернуцца, калі ў Беларусь прыйдзе запраўдная вясна.” Спадзяюся, неўзабаве мне ўдасца разьвязаць астатнія пытаньні й тады нарэшце змагу ўвесь свой час і ўсе свае моцы аддаваць на кар

❤‍🔥198🔥2

31 Dec 2022, 17:45 UTC≈5,570 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎄ЧАРОЎНЫХ СЬВЯТАЎ!✨ Ці ведалі вы, што Салавейка можа прадказаць будучнасьць? Вось праґноз на 2023 год. 🎆 Два першыя забачаныя словы прадкажуць, што чакае вас у новым годзе. Каб пасіліць эфэкт, напішэце йіх у камэнтарох, і прароцтва пэўна ажыцьцявіцца! 🐾 Дзякую шаноўнаму Кіраўніку праекту BIEŁARUSKI ŠAŁ за дапамогу з выявай і агулам! ☀️

❤‍🔥248👍2

2 Nov 2022, 16:30 UTC≈1,660 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🧶 Разьвязак заданьня Пункты, дзе ў абодвух выпадках зьмякчаецца З перад наступным галосным: 2, 3, 5 ✅ 1. З'ехаў з Ірану. — Зьехаў з [Ы]ра́ну. 2. З'явіўся з іншага свету. — Зьявіўся зь йíншага сьвету. 3. Сумна без Яны і без Ігара. — Сумна бязь Яны й бязь йÍгара. 4. Гаварыў з ім праз інтарнэт. — Гаварыў зь йíм праз [ы]нтарнэ́т. 5. На сняданак з'еў кашу з яблыкам. — На сьняданак зьеў кашу зь яблыкам. ✏️ З зьмякчаецца

👍23❤‍🔥7

2 Nov 2022, 10:15 UTC≈1,390 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Заданьне. Уважліва прачытайце. Абярэце пункты, дзе ў абодвух (!) выпадках зьмякчаецца З перад наступным галосным.

  1. 1. З'ехаў з Ірану.18%
  2. 2. З'явіўся з іншага свету.61%
  3. 3. Сумна без Яны і без Ігара.36%
  4. 4. Гаварыў з ім праз інтарнэт.21%
  5. 5. На сняданак з'еў кашу з яблыкам.68%

The shares total 204%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍5❤‍🔥3

31 Oct 2022, 17:20 UTC≈1,280 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📝 Практыка. Памякчэньне зычных перад Е, Ё, Ю, Я, І 📚 Тэорыя. ❓Адкажэце на пытаньні: 1. Якія гукі называюцца ётавымі й чаму? 2. Якія зычныя гукі зьмякчаюцца перад ётавымі? 3. Якія зычныя гукі не зьмякчаюцца перад ётавымі? 4. Калі зьмякчаецца З перад І? 5. Калі не зьмякчаецца З перад І? 🔸Практыкаваньні. Прачытайце ўголас. Зьвярне́це ўвагу на націскі. Патлумачце самі сабе, чаму вы вымаўляеце акурат так, а ня йначай

👏8❤‍🔥6👍4👎1

31 Oct 2022, 15:10 UTC≈1,090 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📚 Памякчэньне зычных перад Е, Ё, Ю, Я, І 🎬 Моўнік. Асыміляцыйная мяккасьць — пад пагрозаю (3:10) ⚡️ Гукі Е, Ё, Ю, Я ды націскны Í называюцца ётавымі галоснымі, бо ўтвараюцца спалучэньнем двух гукаў: нескладовага [й] і адпаведнага галоснага. • Í — спалучэньне [й] + [і] = [ЙІ] • Я — спалучэньне [й] + [а] = [ЙА] • Е — спалучэньне [й] + [э] = [ЙЭ] • Ё — спалучэньне [й] + [о] = [ЙО] • Ю — спалучэньне [й] + [у] = [ЙУ]

16❤‍🔥2

31 Oct 2022, 14:05 UTC≈1,400 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Працягваем вывучаць адметы беларускага вымаўленьня Вітаю, шаноўнае спадарства! Мы ўжо разабраліся зь пераходам НЕ й БЕЗ у НЯ й БЯЗ, з асыміляцыйнаю мяккасьцю й вымаўленьнем І, Ы — цяперака нарэшце прышоў час разабраць памякчэньне зычных перад Е, Ё, Ю, Я, І. Гэтая тэма ўходзіць у топ-5 памылак вымаўленьня, якія несьвядома робяць амаль усе беларускамоўныя людзі — нават дыктары на радыё, сьпевакі, вядоўцы, блогеры, л

22❤‍🔥3🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @salaviejka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Nov 2022, 10:15 UTCAnonymous Poll146 voters

Заданьне. Уважліва прачытайце. Абярэце пункты, дзе ў абодвух (!) выпадках зьмякчаецца З перад наступным галосным.

  1. 1. З'ехаў з Ірану.18%
  2. 2. З'явіўся з іншага свету.61%
  3. 3. Сумна без Яны і без Ігара.36%
  4. 4. Гаварыў з ім праз інтарнэт.21%
  5. 5. На сняданак з'еў кашу з яблыкам.68%

The shares total 204%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Oct 2022, 15:19 UTCAnonymous Poll70 voters

🔸 Практыкаваньне 7. Прачытайце ўголас, патлумачце сабе правіла. Абярэце ўсе варыянты, дзе [ і ] вымаўляецца як [ ы ].

  1. 1. Сродак існаваньня49%
  2. 2. Ніяк іначай56%
  3. 3. Лёг і заснуў46%
  4. 4. Хто ідзе?11%
  5. 5. Брат і сястра64%
  6. 6. Хто там ідзе?47%
  7. 7. Падручнік Ігара36%
  8. 8. Сястра і брат16%
  9. 9. Сярод інтравэртаў73%
  10. 10. Максім Іванавіч60%

The shares total 458%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Oct 2022, 15:14 UTCAnonymous Poll64 voters

🔸 Практыкаваньне 6. Прачытайце ўголас, патлумачце сабе правіла. Абярэце ўсе варыянты, дзе [ і ] вымаўляецца як [ й ].

  1. 1. Рака Ігумéнка56%
  2. 2. Поле і лес86%
  3. 3. Няма іхных рэчаў33%
  4. 4. Гэта Іван61%
  5. 5. Лес і поле6%
  6. 6. Добрая ідэя47%
  7. 7. Адзеўся і пашоў94%
  8. 8. Гожае імя́59%
  9. 9. Сыплюцца іскры25%
  10. 10. Не існуе64%

The shares total 531%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2022 to 5 July 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Салавейка” (@salaviejka), 381 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salaviejka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.