پاسخ به یک ادعای عجیب برای درمان اسهال! ❌ آیا مصرف نوشابه باعث بهبود اختلال اسهال میشود؟ 🚫 نتیجه بررسی: ادعای نادرست ✅ برخی افراد تصور میکنند نوشابه میتواند اسهال را کاهش دهد یا انرژی و مایعات ازدسترفته بدن را جبران کند. بااینحال، شواهد علمی نشان میدهد نوشابههای شیرین معمولاً نهتنها درمان مناسبی برای اسهال نیستند، بلکه بهدلیل مقدار زیاد قند، فروکتوز و شیرینکنندههایی مانند سوربیتول ممکن است علائم را تشدی…

Channel
🍏 کشکول سلامت
@salamat82
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
226subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001006691095 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @salamat82 |
| Description | نکته های کوتاه از سلامت، سبک زندگی و محیط زیست ارتباط با ادمین (کارشناس بهداشت محیط و کارشناس ارشد آموزش بهداشت و ارتقاء سلامت): @h_salahshoor |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/salamat82 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 226 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:20 | 226 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:09 | 227 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 48.8%
- avg views ÷ 226 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 110
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.693%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (27 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,324 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,790
- Videos
- ≈818
- Links
- ≈1,560
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
❇️ «انسانی که ایّاکَ نَعْبُدُ وَ ایّاکَ نَسْتَعین بر زبان می راند، آنگاه با #محیط_زیست خود از راه صفا و وفا به سر می برد.» 📚کتاب «اسلام و محیط زیست»، آیتالله جوادی آملی، صفحه ۷۳ 🔸این نگاه عالمانه و حکیمانه کجا، آن نگاه سفیهانه و ابلهانه کجا که خطاب به زائران سیدالشهداء (علیهالسلام) میگوید «هر جا که میتوانید آشغال بیاندازید، ما با افتخار جمع میکنیم»! 🔸زائر سیدالشهداء (علیهالسلام) حتی اگر بداند هزاران نفر داوطل…
📸 #عکس + ✍ #نقد 📉 مرز مهران، مسیر برگشت از پیادهروی اربعین 📦 کل محتویات این جعبه (شامل لیوانهای بستهبندی آب مصرف شده و نیمخورده و حتی پلمپ مانده و مصرف نشده) وارد زبالهدانی خواهد شد. 📌 زیارت اربعین اگر رهاوردی برای اصلاح #سبک_زندگی مان نداشته باشه و همچنان اهل #اسراف و #تبذير باشیم، کدام راه سیر و سلوک را پیمودهایم؟ 🔸دلمان خوش باشد که قشنگ عزاداری کردیم و شعار دادیم و ... 😕 🔺رهبر شهید انقلاب اسلامی: «همه سع…
🦀 بفرمایید چای با طعم سمّ و سرطان! 🔸اگر هر زائر یک لیوان شخصی همراه داشته باشد، هم سم و سرطان حاصل از ورود میکروپلاستیکها به محتوای نوشیدنی را نوش جان نمیکند (لایه داخلی این لیوانهای کاغذی هم از پلاستیک تشکیل شده) و هم جلوی ایجاد حجم عظیمی از زباله پلاستیکی که میکروپلاستیکها را روانه منابع آبی و محصولات کشاورزی میکند، گرفته میشود. 🍏 کانال کشکول سلامت 🆔 @salamat82 تلگرام | سروش | ایتا
📌کاشکی یه عالمی هم میگفت اربعین رفتن و آشغال ریختن روی زمین و نوشیدنی و غذای نیمخورده را دور انداختن کار بدیه. 🚬 همچنین سیگار کشیدن 🍏 کانال کشکول سلامت 🆔 @salamat82 تلگرام | سروش | ایتا
✅ زباله جمع کردن هنر نیست، زباله کم کردن هنر است ✍ همایون سلحشور فرد، کارشناس بهداشت محیط و کارشناس ارشد آموزش بهداشت و ارتقای سلامت 🔸از جمله خدماتی که در ایام پیادهروی اربعین ارائه میشود، جمعآوری زباله از سطح شهر است که شهرداریهای برخی استانهای ایران نیز در این زمینه به کشور میزبان، عراق کمکرسانی میکنند. 🔸ولی آیا برای ما که مدعی تمدن نوین اسلامی هستیم، همین امر کافیست؟ آیا بهتر نیست با بهره گرفتن از متخصصا…
🏴 فرارسیدن اربعین حسینی تسلیت باد 🍏 کانال کشکول سلامت 🆔 @salamat82 تلگرام | سروش | ایتا
🎥 #کلیپ + ✍ #نقد ✅ اول باید افکار پوسیده را رفتگری کرد ✍ همایون سلحشور فرد، کارشناس بهداشت محیط و کارشناس ارشد آموزش بهداشت و ارتقای سلامت 🔸یک رفتگرنمایی افاضه فرموده است: «رفقا و محبین امام حسین! زائران سیدالشهداء! هرجا که میتوانید آشغال بیاندازید ما با افتخار آشغالهایتان را جمع میکنیم! لبیک یا حسین!» 😐 🔸بسیار خب، شما که زحمت میکشی زبالهها را جمع میکنی، سپس با آنها چه میکنی؟ میدهی به طبیعت که ۱۰۰% تجزیهش…
🎥 #کلیپ : سخنان سخیف یک پاکباننما: رفقا و محبین امام حسین! زائران سیدالشهداء! هرجا که میتوانید آشغال بیاندازید ما با افتخار آشغالهایتان را جمع میکنیم! لبیک یا حسین! ✍ نقد در ادامه ⬇️ 🍏 کانال کشکول سلامت 🆔 @salamat82 تلگرام | سروش | ایتا
✅ در پیادهروی اربعین سعی کنیم از لقمههای سازگار با #محیط_زیست و سلامتی استفاده کنیم 🔸لقمههایی که داخل نان توزیع میشوند، انتخاب مناسبتری هستند؛ البته به شرط اینکه غذای سالمی به این منظور انتخاب شود، نه محصولات ناسالمی نظیر هاتداگ و همبرگر و ... که خود آسیبرسان به سلامت بوده و سرطانزا هستند. 🔸لقمههایی که بر اثر تماس مستقیم اغذیه داغ با بدنه ظروف منحوس پلاستیکی و فومی، آغشته به میکروپلاستیکهای سرطانزا نشده …
❤1
🚬 در خیابانهای پر ازدحام چینِ نامسلمان، سیگار کشیدن ممنوع است، آنوقت در خیابان پر ازدحام یکی از مقدّسترین شهرهای شیعه جهان، کادر درمان هلالاحمر هم سیگار میکشد😐 🚬 در حالی اگر در پوشش امدادگر به طرف حرم مقدّس حضرت عبّاس (سلامالله علیه) حرکت میکند، باید مانند طبیبٌ دوارٌ بطبّه برگردد به دیگران بگوید دود خارج شده از سیگار شما، ضررش برای اطرافیان بیشتر از دودی است که فرو میبری! 📌 این همه روحانی و مداح کاروانهای…
❤2
✳️ در عمود ۳۲۰ مسیر نجف به کربلا هیأتی از استان فارس، شربت گلاب نسترن توزیع میکند بدون یکبار مصرف و در شرائط کاملآ مکانیزه و بهداشتی ✳️ به امید اینکه همه الگو بگیرند و به خاطر پخش نذری، شاهد انبوهی از زبالههای پلاستیکی بیماریزا و فاجعهآمیز برای محیط زیست نباشیم 🍏 کانال کشکول سلامت 🆔 @salamat82 تلگرام | سروش | ایتا
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @salamat82. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 913,252 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🍏 کشکول سلامت” (@salamat82), 226 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salamat82.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.