Channel
@salagaevaliuba
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
509subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002149113992 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @salagaevaliuba |
| Created | Between 1 April 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/salagaevaliuba |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 509 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 503 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 503 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (7 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,683 |
| Reactions total | 69 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 00:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
179 reactions across 16 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 26 | 14.5% | |
| 🤩 | 23 | 12.8% | |
| custom 5253481817532565884 | 21 | 11.7% | |
| custom 5389038097860144794 | 19 | 10.6% | |
| custom 5251220500071352905 | 16 | 8.94% | |
| 💯 | 14 | 7.82% | |
| custom 5355100387273616566 | 11 | 6.15% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 5.59% | |
| custom 5251683368696839679 | 6 | 3.35% | |
| custom 5253506071212888307 | 6 | 3.35% | |
| 😭 | 6 | 3.35% | |
| custom 5253758529390547950 | 4 | 2.23% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 2.23% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 2.23% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 2.23% | |
| custom 5352630536265281725 | 2 | 1.12% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.559% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.559% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.559% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 179reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📖 При чтении сценария я проживаю каждого героя и их эволюцию. Так у меня формируется глубокий психо-образ который я «совмещаю» с каждым актёром которого прикидываю на роль: «Совпадает? Дополняет? Или актёр откровенно «портит» героя?» Это всё очень трогательно, ооооочень сопережевательно (для меня это как рисование), и так приятно, когда ещё и эти актёры откликаются таким же интересом и доверием 🥺😭❤️🔥😭❤️🔥😭❤️🔥 ☀️ …
💯10🥰3
🐾❤🐾 Недавно собрала маленький, но абсолютно бомбический состав. 🙂✏️🗒 С Александрой Богатырёвой начали мы наше режиссёрско-кастинг-директорское сотрудничество с бомбезной сцены из фильма «Олдбой», 2003. 📚 У нас случилось много неприятностей в день смены, но мы успели закончить вовремя! А ребята ТАК ХОРОШО играют, что я считаю это должно лежать у них (и у нас) в портфолио. Без стыда и совести. Смотрю на репите… 🥰
custom 53890380978601447946🤣3custom 52516833686968396793🤩2custom 52534818175325658842😭1custom 52537585293905479501
Ушла делать видосы на темы: 💔 «Почему я не прошел пробы» 💔 «Как помочь ребенку-актеру» Я в творческом ударе 😊😊😊
custom 53890380978601447948🤩3🤣1custom 53551003872736165661
А еще я рекомендую вам «актерски страдать» в этой уникальной чайной @TeastationOfficial на территории Artplay 😊 🙂 Тут невероятно дешево всё, при этом ребята очень профессионально смешивают чаи с сиропами и натуральными фруктами/ягодами. Я люблю задать задачку типа «хочу в таком настроении» или «хочется пряно-сладкого», а они уже фантазируют что-то на тему 🍓☕🐾 Я бесстыдно рекламирую всё, что я ЛУБЛУ 😊😊😊 Найдёте ту…
custom 52535060712128883074👏2💘1😘1
Во многом эти вещи актуальны и для взрослых актеров! Но как будто, чтобы исправиться взрослому актеру нужно больше осознанности в отношении себя, своих слабостей и теневых качеств, что доступно не каждому… А вот дети до 15 лет — заложники своих родителей и именно РОДИТЕЛИ влияют на то, что с их ребенком так или не-так. Но тоже….. Иногда родителю нужно понять устройство индустрии, а иногда — полностью сменить отноше…
💯4custom 53551003872736165663💘1😭1custom 52512205000713529051
Video message, posted without a caption
😭4custom 53551003872736165662💘1
Наконец получила сценарий, запустила поиск по четвертому проекту, «Диализ». Объявление можно изучить здесь, все явки-заявки что-куда там же в объявлении 🥺 Как будто хочется туда больше необычных лиц, хотя по референсам режиссёра — обыденно-скромно. Зато режиссёр задаст картинку не абы какую! Любителям абсурда, артхауса и психодела — добро пожаловать :) особенно актерам постарше будем рады 🥺
👏6😍4custom 52516833686968396791
Исправила. 100 человек! 50 - в каждом проекте.
custom 52512205000713529054👏1💋1
Провела 4 тура проб — 2 в тизер полного метра и 2 в короткий метр 😮💨 Увидели за 4 дня 100 человек 🥰 люблю очень ансамблевые пробы: и вам есть с кем играть, и нам удаётся в кратчайшие сроки увидеть много людей! Немного отдохну и надо будет решать, кого по итогу берём 💔 PS: видос и пост к вопросу о том, как актёру удаётся пройти пробы — выйдет на недельке!
custom 525122050007135290511🤩6custom 52534818175325658846custom 52537585293905479501
Изначально, я - художник. Чистила папку с фотографиями за 2022г и нашла видос. Под эту музыку (если досмотрите до конца) это превращается не просто в процесс рисования, но в полноценную анимацию, особенно когда я перехожу на отрисовку фона 🥰 Нигде под оригинальный трек это не выложишь, так что поделюсь тут 👀 🤬А задумка моя с чисткой старых фото перешла в процесс создания контента из уже подзабытой жизни… так что ха…
custom 52534818175325658845🥰3👏2custom 53526305362652817252⚡1custom 53551003872736165661
Я еще не представляю как это будет, но конкретно в эту работу откликнулось много оооочень хороших актеров и режиссёр уже не знает как быть ❤😭💔
👏7🤩2
Video message, posted without a caption
👏8custom 53890380978601447945🤩3🥰1custom 52534818175325658841
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @salagaevaliuba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
О чем вам рассказать? 😊✏️🗒
The shares total 169%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 957,413 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Любовь Салагаева Актриса и Кастинг Директор” (@salagaevaliuba), 509 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salagaevaliuba.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.