Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for sakuraの碎碎唸|東京生活日常

Channel

sakuraの碎碎唸|東京生活日常

@sakura7456

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

476subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002224385703
TypeChannel
Username@sakura7456
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sakura7456

Growth

4764824797 August 2026 — 482 subscribers8 August 2026 — 482 subscribers8 August 2026 — 480 subscribers15 August 2026 — 478 subscribers22 August 2026 — 476 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 14 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 475–483 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 03:58476-2
15 Aug 2026, 19:53478-2
8 Aug 2026, 16:06480-2
8 Aug 2026, 04:33482no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:44482first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.75%
avg views ÷ 476 subscribers
Avg views / post
36.9
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
15
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (25 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total553
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC13 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

那些对我恶语相向的人 看见我的内心是只软乎乎的小猫 还会骂我吗>^ω^<

5 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC17 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

最近雷陣雨有點多 忘帶傘怎麼辦? 那就“一場雨,把我困在這裡”

4 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC19 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

八月好 ~ 想對一直默默支持我的哥哥們說聲謝謝。 因為有你們的照顧,讓我的每一天都很有動力、過得很充實。 最近如果剛好有空想放鬆,要不要給小櫻一個機會,讓我為你安排一下呢? 我會用心準備好每一次的相遇。雖然 8 月也有自己的小目標想努力達成,但無論如何,都很感謝一路有你們相伴。新的一個月,也請多多照顧了~ ⚝⭒ @me_a86898 ⭒⚝

1 Aug 2026, 06:14 UTC29 viewsread 8 August 2026

做人好難,如果可以我想做一根薯條。薯條很合群 ,一根薯條丟進一堆薯條裡面就找不到了;薯條也很獨特 ,每一個薯條長得都差不多但是世界上沒有兩根完全相同的薯條,每一根都長得恰到好處的獨特;薯條是F人,同情能力強,容易心軟;薯條很堅強,油鍋裡面越炸越硬;薯條普遍但是不普通,溫柔又強大。我好想成為薯條,、

29 Jul 2026, 07:47 UTC35 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

希望這次熊本的哥哥們都能平安度過,一切安好。 也願所有受到影響的人都能平安無事,早日恢復正常生活。

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @sakura7456. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 461,891 of 1,605,487entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“sakuraの碎碎唸|東京生活日常” (@sakura7456), 476 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sakura7456.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.