Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

НПЦ Крылья Сахалина

@sakhwings

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

512subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002188459648
TypeChannel
Username@sakhwings
DescriptionНаучно-производственный центр в области развития беспилотных авиационных систем 🔗 Наш rutube https://rutube.ru/channel/65698510/ МАХ https://max.ru/id6500016120_biz
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/sakhwings

Growth

512513512.56 Aug 2026, 05:07 — 513 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:10 — 512 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:33 — 512 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 05:076 Aug 2026, 18:33
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 512–513 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 18:33512no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:10512-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:07513first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.1%
avg views ÷ 512 subscribers
Avg views / post
221
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held10 (7 July 202631 July 2026)
Views total1,104
Reactions total23
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
430
Videos
134
Links
198

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1125.0%
🔥1125.0%
👍920.5%
👌36.82%
🙈36.82%
24.55%
🎉12.27%
💯12.27%
😇12.27%
🙏12.27%
🤝12.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 01:00 UTC97 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sakhonlineVideo

Генеральный директор АНО «НПЦ Крылья Сахалина» Виктор Грицаенко — о развитии сферы БПЛА ——— ✒️ Подписаться на нас: Telegram I MAX 📲 Прислать нам новость: @Sakhonlinebot

👍1

30 Jul 2026, 00:42 UTC131 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥31😇1

30 Jul 2026, 00:42 UTC128 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Мы уже работаем на международных форумах «Энергия Сахалина» и «Острова роста» 🛸 Заглядывайте на стенд АНО «НПЦ Крылья Сахалина» — расскажем о нашей работе, ответим на вопросы и будем рады встрече! 📲 ВК | 👻 МАХ | 📲 Rutube

🔥41🙏1

24 Jul 2026, 05:33 UTC216 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

✈️ Первый беспилотный рейс по доставке медицинского груза В рамках контракта между АНО «НПЦ Крылья Сахалина» и авиакомпанией «Аврора-БАС» в Сахалинской области впервые выполнен полет беспилотника с реальной доставкой медицинских грузов 🚑 Подробнее в официальном канале губернатора Сахалинской области Валерия Лимаренко 📲 ВК | 👻 МАХ | 📲 Rutube

👌2🔥21

18 Jul 2026, 08:57 UTC532 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сахалинский опыт защиты ТЭК от БПЛА представили в Госдуме 🏷На экспертной площадке Государственной Думы состоялось заседание, посвящённое вопросам технологической независимости и комплексной безопасности предприятий ТЭК. Сахалинскую область представил генеральный директор АНО «НПЦ Крылья Сахалина», председатель Сахалинского регионального отделения СоюзМаш России Виктор Грицаенко. Он рассказал об опыте внедрения наиб

3🔥2🙈1

13 Jul 2026, 07:12 UTC214 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🛡 Комплексные испытания беспилотных систем прошли в заливе Мордвинова Специалисты АНО «НПЦ Крылья Сахалина» успешно отработали комплексный сценарий применения беспилотных технологий 🛸 В испытаниях были задействованы беспилотный летательный аппарат вертикального вылета и посадки «ИнноВтол-3с», безэкипажный УП-400 и радиолокационная станция. 🟢 В ходе испытаний РЛС обеспечивала обнаружение и сопровождение объектов ка

2👍2🙈1

10 Jul 2026, 04:07 UTC232 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

В объективе: второй день форума «Крылья Сахалина» Делимся новой подборкой фотографий со второго дня международного форума «Крылья Сахалина». Деловая программа, работа выставки, встречи участников и атмосфера форума — в нашей фотоподборке. 📲 ВК | 👻 МАХ | 📲 Rutube

2👍21🙈1

9 Jul 2026, 03:35 UTC197 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🛟 Испытания под водой: тестируем отечественный ТНПА «Смартдайв» В новом видео — испытания отечественного телеуправляемого необитаемого подводного аппарата «Смартдайв». Такие технологии открывают широкие возможности для региона: обследование подводной инфраструктуры и гидротехнических сооружений, осмотр корпусов судов и причалов, мониторинг состояния акваторий, а также проведение поисковых и инспекционных работ без

1👌1🤝1

8 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC386 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🇷🇺 В рамках форума «Крыльях Сахалина» прошли масштабные учения Мероприятия по защите объектов критической инфраструктуры от угроз с применением БВС и безэкипажных катеров прошли на Сахалине с 3 по 4 июля в рамках международного форума беспилотных аппаратов всех сред «Крылья Сахалина» ✈️ К участию привлечены ведущие компании РФ в сфере беспилотных систем и средств защиты: ZALA, НПЦ «Крылья Сахалина», Аврора БАС, Хол

👍41🎉1💯1

7 Jul 2026, 04:21 UTC661 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

Испытания системы обнаружения лесных пожаров «Лесохранитель» Показываем, как прошли испытания комплекса «Лесохранитель» на базе беспилотника «ИнноВтол-3с» 🌲 В видео - реальные кадры тестирования системы, которая с помощью искусственного интеллекта обнаруживает дым и помогает своевременно выявлять лесные пожары. 📹 Смотрите, как это было. Напоминаем, НПЦ «Крылья Сахалина» обеспечивает поставку оборудования, необход

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @sakhwings. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 278,427 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НПЦ Крылья Сахалина” (@sakhwings), 512 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sakhwings.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.