Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

۶ৎ . 𝖲𝖺𝗂𝖼𝗁𝗂 . ₊˚

@saichiigray

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

288subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002338758602
TypeChannel
Username@saichiigray
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/saichiigray

Growth

2882902896 August 2026 — 290 subscribers6 August 2026 — 289 subscribers6 August 2026 — 289 subscribers14 August 2026 — 288 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 288–290 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 00:35288-1
6 Aug 2026, 23:02289no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:32289-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:51290first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
68.7%
avg views ÷ 288 subscribers
Avg views / post
198
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
19.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held15 (3 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,771
Reactions total543
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

543 reactions across 14 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 532797236451479262012823.6%
11821.7%
custom 53302427185872003647614.0%
custom 5458790157748550600336.08%
💘315.71%
custom 5242559393576291093254.60%
🕊234.24%
custom 5384369408279868739193.50%
❤‍🔥193.50%
👾142.58%
custom 5260524949717683195112.03%
🍓112.03%
🔥112.03%
👀101.84%
custom 521787335607795804040.737%
custom 519278690307359244430.552%
🤬30.552%
custom 519315922949351716520.368%
🎉10.184%
😇10.184%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 543reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 14 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @saichiigray. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC23 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @nyawuyoPhoto

🧁🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🧁 🧁 В честь того что у меня завтра день рождения! 🧁 🧁🧁🧁🧁🧁🧁🧁🧁🧁 Условия ; 1. Репост этого поста в тг канал, или два пиар чат! 2. Подписка по желанию. 🧁🧁🧁🧁🧁🧁🧁🧁🧁 🧁 Можно искать мью, и пиарится под этим постом. Некоторых могу репостнуть. 🤩

🕊53custom 53279723645147926202custom 53302427185872003641

Signed 𝂅 ࣪ ㅤ۶ৎㅤ𝓼𝖺𝗶𝐜𝗁𝗂ㅤ!ㅤ ࣪ 𝂅

6 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC83 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ладно я соврала я его не использовала я отвлекалась на брайна и анастазис

❤‍🔥114custom 53279723645147926202

Signed 𝂅 ࣪ ㅤ۶ৎㅤ𝓼𝖺𝗶𝐜𝗁𝗂ㅤ!ㅤ ࣪ 𝂅

6 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC86 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Почему я использую туториал как рендерить золото чтобы рендерить шарики #SP

custom 532797236451479262011💘4❤‍🔥2🕊2custom 53302427185872003641

Signed 𝂅 ࣪ ㅤ۶ৎㅤ𝓼𝖺𝗶𝐜𝗁𝗂ㅤ!ㅤ ࣪ 𝂅

6 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTC112 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 53302427185872003647👾5💘2❤‍🔥1🕊1custom 54587901577485506001

Signed 𝂅 ࣪ ㅤ۶ৎㅤ𝓼𝖺𝗶𝐜𝗁𝗂ㅤ!ㅤ ࣪ 𝂅

6 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC116 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @bumabladePhoto

내꿈 💚 ˚ ⌒ 🙇‍♂️♡ . 㠳〢 . я наконец то это закончила господи!!! теперь эта пиздатая женщина будет лицом этого нищего канала 💀 попозже ей буду рисовать арт для полного оформления канала! надеюсь на ваши реакции:3 <Зз #ocart ✿⃘ 𓂃 ⋂៸៸ ⁺‧₊ 😴 ﹆ֹ › ࣪ ˖ 🤍˖ ࣪ 𖠵 ꢾ𓍢ִ໋

16custom 53279723645147926205custom 54587901577485506004❤‍🔥1👾1🕊1😇1custom 52425593935762910931

Signed 𝂅 ࣪ ㅤ۶ৎㅤ𝓼𝖺𝗶𝐜𝗁𝗂ㅤ!ㅤ ࣪ 𝂅

6 Aug 2026, 04:52 UTC119 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ребята вы что я не умерла

custom 5327972364514792620124custom 54587901577485506002🕊1custom 53302427185872003641

Signed 𝂅 ࣪ ㅤ۶ৎㅤ𝓼𝖺𝗶𝐜𝗁𝗂ㅤ!ㅤ ࣪ 𝂅

5 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC155 views46 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Если честно так мне нравится НАМНОГО больше В первом вообще гармонии нет, поза непонятная цвета не подходят ВСЕ ПЛОХА УЖАС #SP

16custom 545879015774855060014custom 52425593935762910937👀4❤‍🔥1👾1🕊1custom 53279723645147926201

Signed 𝂅 ࣪ ㅤ۶ৎㅤ𝓼𝖺𝗶𝐜𝗁𝗂ㅤ!ㅤ ࣪ 𝂅

5 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC763 views52 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

. ⏝ ︶ ׄ 𝒩ℯ𝓌 𝒂𝒓𝒕 !݁ !!︶ . ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ Happy birthday @MiniCrafts56! Саичи попробуй не торопиться и не заруинить весь рисунок к херам сорри ай каннот фулфилл зис реквест #art #digital #gift ۫. ׁ࿙ֵྀི⃜۫ ׁ꒰⃝‌ 𝘵𝘢𝘱 𝘵𝘢𝘱 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴!!𝅄 ೀ

16custom 524255939357629109311custom 53279723645147926209👀6custom 53302427185872003643👾2custom 51927869030735924442custom 52178733560779580402

Signed 𝂅 ࣪ ㅤ۶ৎㅤ𝓼𝖺𝗶𝐜𝗁𝗂ㅤ!ㅤ ࣪ 𝂅

4 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC181 views47 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ребята помогите брайн мапсия оккупировала саичистан Рьююьылылвлвлв спасибо за зведочку🥺

custom 532797236451479262018custom 533024271858720036411🕊8💘41❤‍🔥1custom 51927869030735924441custom 52178733560779580401

Signed 𝂅 ࣪ ㅤ۶ৎㅤ𝓼𝖺𝗶𝐜𝗁𝗂ㅤ!ㅤ ࣪ 𝂅

4 Aug 2026, 06:28 UTC207 views48 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ой ребятаа, мне сегодня предстоит столько работы, я умру, а еще я сомневаюсь покажу ли я коммишку вторую, потому что я не очень довольна результатом☹️☹️ Я еще постоянно пересматриваю брайана мапса, где он хорроры играет, потому что мне нефиг делать У мини крафтс день рождение завтра, это ее ос на скетче #sketch #SP

custom 533024271858720036421🍓11custom 53279723645147926209🤬3❤‍🔥2🎉1💘1

Signed 𝂅 ࣪ ㅤ۶ৎㅤ𝓼𝖺𝗶𝐜𝗁𝗂ㅤ!ㅤ ࣪ 𝂅

3 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC212 views68 reactions9 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

. ⏝ ︶ ׄ 𝒩ℯ𝓌 𝒂𝒓𝒕 !݁ !!︶ . ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ⎯ׅ Это вторая по счету коммишка вообще которая постилась в этом тгк от того же замечательного заказчика @AiLinSeonbae !! (А так же прекрасный косплеер, рекомендую подписаться на нее) #art #digital #cmm ۫. ׁ࿙ֵྀི⃜۫ ׁ꒰⃝‌ 𝘵𝘢𝘱 𝘵𝘢𝘱 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴!!𝅄 ೀ СОНЯЯЯЯЯ звезда ты моя спасибо рью тоже спасиба

30💘11🔥11custom 53302427185872003646custom 53279723645147926203custom 51931592294935171652custom 52605249497176831952🕊1

Signed 𝂅 ࣪ ㅤ۶ৎㅤ𝓼𝖺𝗶𝐜𝗁𝗂ㅤ!ㅤ ࣪ 𝂅

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @saichiigray. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 189,911 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“۶ৎ . 𝖲𝖺𝗂𝖼𝗁𝗂 . ₊˚” (@saichiigray), 288 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saichiigray.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.