Channel
@saharnikroo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,314subscribers
+84 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002151882798 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @saharnikroo |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/saharnikroo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 3,314 | +33 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 3,281 | +48 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 3,233 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 3,230 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:41 | 3,230 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 June 2026 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 8,340 |
| Reactions total | 109 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
497 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 325 | 65.4% | |
| 👍 | 86 | 17.3% | |
| 👏 | 53 | 10.7% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 2.01% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 1.21% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 0.805% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.805% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 0.805% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 0.604% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.201% | |
| 🤷♀ | 1 | 0.201% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 497reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
آیا همه مادرها، ظرفیت مادری کردن را دارند؟ در این قسمت، از تفاوت میان مادر شدن و مادری کردن، مفهوم “کارکرد مادری” در روانکاوی و ویژگیهای روانیای صحبت میکنم که رشد سالم یک کودک را ممکن میکنند. ⏳ ۳:۳۰ دقیقه #رابطه_با_فرزند #رابطه_با_مادر
❤23👏4
Photo, posted without a caption
❤7👏3
صحبت کردن از پول، همان ابتدای رابطه، به معنای خیانت به عشق نیست. #رابطه_با_دیگری @saharnikroo
❤20👏4
شاید دشوارترین لحظهی عشق، وقتی باشد که تصویرها فرو میریزند و برای اولین بار، انسانی واقعی روبهروی ما میایستد. #رابطه_با_خود #رابطه_با_دیگری برای دریافت وقت رواندرمانی آنلاین از طریق لینک زیر وارد وبسایت رابطه شوید. Raabeteh.com
❤19👍3👏2
Photo, posted without a caption
🥰3❤1
گاهی آنچه از گذشته میپرسیم، در حقیقت پرسشی درباره آینده است. وقتی از گذشته عاطفیِ کسی سؤال میکنیم، همیشه به دنبال دانستن چند خاطره یا چند نام نیستیم؛ گاهی میخواهیم بفهمیم چگونه عشق ورزیده، چگونه رنج کشیده، چه چیزهایی او را ساخته و امروز با چه نگاهی روبهروی ما ایستاده است. اما مرز باریکی میان «شناخت» و «کنجکاوی» وجود دارد؛ مرزی که اگر نادیده گرفته شود، گفتوگو را از صمیمیت دور میکند. در این مقاله، از چرایی این…
❤14🙏3👍2👏1
📝 اگر عشق یعنی دوست داشتن، چرا دقیقاً از همان کسی که بیشتر دوستش داریم، بیشتر هم خشمگین میشویم؟ در این میکروپادکست، از منظر روانکاوی و با تکیه بر ایدههای اتو کرنبرگ، دربارهی این پارادوکس صحبت میکنم. #رابطه_با_دیگری
❤20👌4👏1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3🥰3
چرا عاشق کسانی میشویم که عاشق ما نیستند؟ کنراد لورنتس، جانورشناس اتریشی، کشف کرد که جوجهغازها الزاماً به مادر واقعی خود دلبسته نمیشوند؛ آنها به نخستین موجود متحرکی که پس از تولد میبینند، وابسته میشوند. ممکن است آن موجود، مادرشان باشد؛ اما ممکن است یک کشاورز، یک دوچرخه یا حتی تکهای از یک ماشین کشاورزی باشد. شاید این آزمایش فقط درباره پرندگان به نظر درست برسد، اما روانشناسان سالهاست از آن برای فهم یکی از پیچ…
❤17👍3🥰2
بعضی رابطهها نه به خاطر کمبود عشق، بلکه به خاطر الگویی که بین دو نفر شکل گرفته، بارها در یک چرخه تکراری تکرار میشوند. هرچه یکی بیشتر برای نزدیک شدن تلاش میکند، دیگری بیشتر فاصله میگیرد؛ و همین فاصله، میل نفر اول را برای نزدیک شدن بیشتر میکند. در دوره «من نزدیک میشوم، او دور میشود» این الگو را از نگاه روانتحلیلی و سیستمی بررسی کردهام؛ اینکه چگونه شکل میگیرد، چرا تکرار میشود و چگونه میتوان آن را تغییر داد…
❤13👏2🤷♀1
خیلی وقتها فکر میکنیم شغلی که انتخاب کردهایم، کاملاً نتیجهٔ علاقه و تصمیم خودمان بوده است. اما واقعیت این است که خانواده، حتی بدون قصد و نیت بد، میتواند سالها روی انتخابهای شغلی ما اثر بگذارد. گاهی این تأثیر مستقیم است؛ با فشار، توقع یا مقایسه. گاهی هم آنقدر ظریف است که اصلاً متوجهش نمیشویم. اگر تا به حال از خودتان پرسیدهاید: «واقعاً این مسیر را خودم انتخاب کردهام؟» یا «چرا با وجود موفقیت، از کارم رضایت ن…
❤30👏3
📝 وقتی تمام پاسخِ «من کی هستم؟» را از شغلمان میخواهیم، هر تغییر شغلی میتواند شبیه یک بحران هویت تجربه شود. در این میکروپادکست، دربارهی هویتی صحبت میکنم که بسیار فراتر از هر عنوان و هر نقش است. #رابطه_با_خود #رابطه_با_شغل
❤25👍1👏1😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @saharnikroo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 461,718 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sahar Nikroo” (@saharnikroo), 3,314 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saharnikroo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.