2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 170–172 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 08:30
171
no change
10 Aug 2026, 08:16
171
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
94.6%
avg views ÷ 171 subscribers
Avg views / post
162
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
20 (5 August 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
3,236
Reactions total
544
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
532
Videos
45
Links
28
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
544 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
426
78.3%
😁
53
9.74%
❤
36
6.62%
🤝
6
1.10%
💔
5
0.919%
😍
5
0.919%
😐
4
0.735%
😢
3
0.551%
💯
2
0.368%
🕊
1
0.184%
😈
1
0.184%
🥱
1
0.184%
🥴
1
0.184%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 544reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/saharashouri1986/2324?comment=7799
شاید برای شما هم سوال باشه که چرا از روژان حساب میبرید، راز موفقیتش چیه؟
در واقع راز موفقیت این افراد دیکتاتور بودنشونه.
اولین نفری که در عمر من، خانواده به خصوص پدر و مادرم حسابی ازش حساب میبردن #ننه (ملقب به کیم ایل سونگ) هست.
بعد از فوت ننه، مدت کوتاهی حزب بدون رهبر مونده بود و بابا و مامانم واقعا سردرگم شده بودن، نه که یه عمر رییس داشتن، این شد که ظالمترین و …
کی فکرشو میکرد که سعید بره یه دونه انبه بخره بیاره خونه.
بعد وقتی بشنوه روژان داره میاد، بپرسه: روژان انبه دوست داره؟
و تو بگی آره.
و اون بگه: پس انبه رو قایم کن تا روژان بره.
جنگ ما رو عوض کرده.
زمان قدیم یه رمان خوندم به اسم کتی که خیلی دوستش داشتم، الان هر چی میگردم دیگه پیدا نمیکنم.
انگار آخرین نسخه همون بود که از شوهرعمهم قرض گرفتم و گفتم یه هفتهای پسش میدم، ولی تو خوابگاه گمش کردم.
یه مدت با کت دامادی سعید که خریده بود تا شب عروسی خونه مون بمونه میرفت در مرغها رو ببنده.
کراوات هم شل آویزون میکرد، میگفت: گرهشو سفت کنم نفسم میگیره، این خارجیا چیه کراوات میزنن، اصلا برای سلامتی خوب نیست.
https://t.me/c/2964754376/7547
از اونجایی که مادرم خیلی آدم کنجکاویه، سالهای پیش که ما غاز و اردک و قبلش مرغ و خروس، الان سگ و گربه داریم، معمولا ما هر لباسی که داشتیم حداقل یه بار و حداکثر تا پاره کردن میپوشه، میره سراغ جک و جونورا.
یه بار من یه بارونی خیلی خفن و گرون خریده بودم، خشکسالی بود و هنوز نپوشیده بودم و خدا خدا میکردم بارون بیاد، خبری نبود.
با کاور میآوردم توتکابن، با کاور میبردم رشت، خیلی دوستش دا…
https://t.me/saharashouri1986/2296?comment=6713
#خاطره
نزدیک چهلم مرحوم مهسا امینی بود. همون روزها مامان میخواست بیاد رشت دکتر برای رماتیسم و پادرد، و من مدام تاکید میکردم که نوبتش رو طوری بگیره که روز چهلم نباشه. کاملا هم دست خودش بود.
روز چهلم زنگ زد و گفت: چون خاله ماریا میخواد امروز بره رشت، منم باهاش میرم.
من غر زدم که یعنی چی، کنسل کنید حتما. قراره شلوغ بشه.
گفت: اون که شهرداریه، ما گلساریم، تازه اون غر…
شاید برای شما هم سوال پیش اومده باشه که چرا سعید، سحر، سپهر، همه با سین، اونوقت آرسام؟؟
موقع انتخاب اسم برای آرسام، ما تمام مدت داشتیم تو اینترنت دنبال اسامی «س» دار میگشتیم. بعضی از اسمها به نظرمون لوس و سوسولی بود، بعضیها امروزی نبود، بعضیها معنی خوبی نداشت، یه سری تکراری بود و ...
خلاصه یه روز که مثل همیشه در حال بررسی اسامی بودیم، سعید گفت: چه کاریه حالا حتما با س باشه. بقیه اسمها هم قشنگن مثلا فلان و فلان…
https://t.me/saharashouri1986/2311?comment=7152
اوایل که سپیددندان اومده بود، اینقدر دوستش داشتیم از ترس اینکه صاحبش پیدا بشه عکسشو نمیذاشتم تو کانال.
الان واسه اینکه به عنوان پناه دادن به یه مجرم خطرناک، نیان نبرنمون، عکس نمیذارم.
🤣23😁2
Signed Sahar
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @saharashouri1986. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,108,874 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سحر عاشوری” (@saharashouri1986), 171 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saharashouri1986.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.