Make your votes fam ππ
- He deserves a spot here fam!! π81%
- Nah , this is another farmer here lmao π19%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@safudevsjournal
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
60subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001740643693 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @safudevsjournal |
| Description | Journaling safe devs and their previous projects et moonshots across bsc and eth.. Nothing here is financial advice , just probabilities π |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/safudevsjournal |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 60 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 60 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 April 2023 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 10 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
125 reactions across 7 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 27 | 21.6% | |
| β€ | 17 | 13.6% | |
| π³ | 13 | 10.4% | |
| π | 9 | 7.20% | |
| π | 9 | 7.20% | |
| π― | 8 | 6.40% | |
| π₯ | 7 | 5.60% | |
| π¦ | 5 | 4.00% | |
| π | 3 | 2.40% | |
| π | 3 | 2.40% | |
| π | 3 | 2.40% | |
| π | 3 | 2.40% | |
| β‘ | 2 | 1.60% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 2 | 1.60% | |
| π | 2 | 1.60% | |
| π | 2 | 1.60% | |
| π | 2 | 1.60% | |
| π€― | 2 | 1.60% | |
| π₯° | 2 | 1.60% | |
| β | 1 | 0.8% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 2.40% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 125reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2023 to 22 April 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Make your votes fam ππ
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Should @King_hekker be granted a spot here? https://t.me/BabyAlphabetNetwork is his current project with a 80k ath A poll coming up β»οΈ
β€1
GM chads β€οΈπ₯ I'm gonna be dropping another poll here shortly on a dev i noticed recently Would appreciate the community effort in dropping your votes πβ€οΈ
OK then , seems community has decided and doesn't want him here yet
Do drop your votes chads!! π«
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Should @Clavishhhh be granted a spot here @BearCoinTOKEN is his previous project with a 120k ath A poll coming up β»οΈ
SAFU DEVS π€ππ pinned Β«DEV : @dukebitch & @sherbuck Previous projects.. Non-Fungible Toast (NFT) π BSC : https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x13fa04d875eb6d093b102ffe729e02f462b1b526 Telegram community : @NonFungibleToast 1 bnb starting mc to 120k ATH Shibmoon (SBM) π BSC : https:/β¦Β»
I'm gonna be dropping another poll here shortly on a dev i noticed recently Would appreciate the community effort in dropping your votes πβ€οΈ
DEV : @dukebitch & @sherbuck Previous projects.. Non-Fungible Toast (NFT) π BSC : https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x13fa04d875eb6d093b102ffe729e02f462b1b526 Telegram community : @NonFungibleToast 1 bnb starting mc to 120k ATH Shibmoon (SBM) π BSC : https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xfdcb53dcf7a629f50342b688ec6b51b7f7f46f1b Telegram community : https://t.me/ShibmoonToken 0.5 BNB starting mc to 62k ATH
π5π₯3β€2π³2π¦2π1π1π1
The community has decided π₯ I'm listing them now π
π4π2β€1π³1π1π―1π¦1
This Shibmoon community are definitely addicted to emojis π
π5π3π2β€1π1π³1π1π1
ππ₯
β€4π³4π3β€βπ₯2π2π€―2π₯1π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @safudevsjournal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Make your votes fam ππ
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do drop your votes chads!! π«
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do drop your opinion on this team fam !! π
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2023 to 22 April 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank β 1,394,557 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@safudevsjournal named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βSAFU DEVS π€ππβ (@safudevsjournal), 60 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/safudevsjournal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.