Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

:sw daizy ›

@sadltme

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

50subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002137733529
TypeChannel
Username@sadltme
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 29 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sadltme

Growth

505150.57 August 2026 — 51 subscribers10 August 2026 — 51 subscribers15 August 2026 — 50 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50–51 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:0350-1
10 Aug 2026, 11:1551no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:5851first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 29 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

238 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9439.5%
💋7531.5%
custom 52494178894122983863514.7%
custom 54361031225838265043113.0%
custom 525352559613419324031.26%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 238reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2024 to 30 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2025, 10:33 UTC226 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @naivejuskaPhoto

#obsession — read here 🫀 я прижигаю вены, которые ты разрезал. в конце концов, ты забрал у меня все. (haobin, slash, R, toxic relationship)

💋4

Signed 데이지

21 Aug 2025, 17:08 UTC243 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Я хихикаю, валяясь на полу Взаимоотношения моих шимконгз были бы примерно такими

4💋3custom 52535255961341932402

Signed 데이지

18 Aug 2025, 11:41 UTC217 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @naivejuskaPhoto

#roommates — read here 🌟 (donggyu n junmin) иногда каждому нужен свой сосед с пачкой чипсов. gen, G, hurt/comfort

6💋1custom 52535255961341932401

Signed 데이지

15 Aug 2025, 22:14 UTC231 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Даже анкета есть!

4💋1

Signed 데이지

15 Aug 2025, 22:12 UTC213 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Всё налажено, мозг включён. Если имеется возможность – репостните, пожалуйста. Буду потихоньку возвращаться как и в райтерское комьюнити, так и в мьюшество. Если так же имеется желание замьючиться – предлагайте, я буду только за

5💋1

Signed 데이지

15 Aug 2025, 21:45 UTC183 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🤩 вы же не подумали, что я с концами ушла с последнего поста? Да, в этот раз без обозначения фд, зато с чувством

9💋5

Signed 데이지

15 Aug 2025, 21:44 UTC267 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#sketch : От лица виноватого ⇠ Серьёзно. Быть тварью так легко. Как и легко принять эту данность. Но как только дело дошло до просьбы – и жалость к себе пробирается моментально сквозь, казалось бы, непробиваемую стену гордости.

10💋5

Signed 데이지

15 May 2025, 18:55 UTC440 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Было бы круто, если бы это ещё и распространили, но это вообще уже наглость (и всё же) 🤲🏻

8💋7

Signed 데이지

15 May 2025, 18:52 UTC≈1,220 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Да, это было рискованно с моей стороны и явно неожиданно – взять и вернуться с какой-то непонятно откуда взявшейся работой. Но я хочу наконец закрыть свои многочисленные гештальты, и этот – один из главных. Приятного чтения, если тут остался кто-либо живой https://ficbook.net/readfic/0196d526-a918-7d4f-9fbd-592194a3e7e1

💋107

Signed 데이지

18 Jan 2025, 16:42 UTC551 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Да, я райтер, и мне не стыдно себя считать им, даже если я закрылась полгода назад

7

Signed 데이지

17 May 2024, 21:58 UTC≈1,380 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Кто такой “фокальный персонаж”, может ли Вася ебаться с Петровым и почему этому не учат в школе – поговорим об этом здесь и сейчас. Эту статью меня попросила написать Арин, но полезной она может оказаться любому автору, стремящемуся развивать писательские навыки. Поехали! https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OOlGTcD7eLkZfJCuak74J9h3ggjzP6oXQwPkEfaQDcI/edit?usp=drivesdk

💋31

Signed 데이지

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sadltme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“:sw daizy ›” (@sadltme), 50 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sadltme.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.