Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for (عُــلـو الهِـمّـة) ‌|•°.𓆩ᥫ᭡𓆪

Channel

(عُــلـو الهِـمّـة) ‌|•°.𓆩ᥫ᭡𓆪

@sadakah_jariyah5

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

30,496subscribers

-352 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001225443852
TypeChannel
Username@sadakah_jariyah5
Description(القناة الرسمية العامة) عُْــلا الفِـرجـاني |كاتبة |باحثة في حقوق المرأة رُبَّ كلمة أحيت همّة، و رُبَّ همّة أحيت أمّة - خُذ مَاشِئتْ وأترُك لِي دَعوة |ٌ
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sadakah_jariyah5

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

30,37730,84830,612.56 August 2026 — 30,848 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,842 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,828 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,809 subscribers9 August 2026 — 30,796 subscribers10 August 2026 — 30,773 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,748 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,729 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,697 subscribers15 August 2026 — 30,690 subscribers17 August 2026 — 30,659 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,631 subscribers19 August 2026 — 30,616 subscribers20 August 2026 — 30,596 subscribers21 August 2026 — 30,574 subscribers22 August 2026 — 30,534 subscribers24 August 2026 — 30,511 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30,473 subscribers26 August 2026 — 30,461 subscribers27 August 2026 — 30,438 subscribers28 August 2026 — 30,412 subscribers29 August 2026 — 30,391 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30,377 subscribers31 August 2026 — 30,383 subscribers1 September 2026 — 30,424 subscribers2 September 2026 — 30,422 subscribers3 September 2026 — 30,381 subscribers5 September 2026 — 30,385 subscribers8 September 2026 — 30,434 subscribers11 September 2026 — 30,443 subscribers13 September 2026 — 30,449 subscribers14 September 2026 — 30,450 subscribers16 September 2026 — 30,495 subscribers18 September 2026 — 30,496 subscribers30,4966 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -352. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,306–30,919 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 13:5730,496+1
16 Sept 2026, 07:4030,495+45
14 Sept 2026, 16:1630,450+1
13 Sept 2026, 05:0130,449+6
11 Sept 2026, 06:0130,443+9
8 Sept 2026, 08:1930,434+49
5 Sept 2026, 01:2030,385+4
3 Sept 2026, 09:4430,381-41
2 Sept 2026, 03:4530,422-2
1 Sept 2026, 07:1630,424+41
31 Aug 2026, 10:3530,383+6
30 Aug 2026, 07:4830,377-14
29 Aug 2026, 08:2730,391-21
28 Aug 2026, 05:2330,412-26
27 Aug 2026, 03:4330,438-23
26 Aug 2026, 03:2730,461-12
25 Aug 2026, 05:5530,473-38
24 Aug 2026, 02:2330,511-23
22 Aug 2026, 11:4430,534-40
21 Aug 2026, 04:2330,574first reading

Engagement

514 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.278%
avg views ÷ 30,496 subscribers
Avg views / post
84.9
244 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
244
of 514 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 145 of 244 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held514 (3 August 202623 September 2026)
Views total20,712
Reactions total523
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 13:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
11,400
Videos
1,860
Links
605

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 46m
Average length
3m 49s

Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

756 reactions across 250 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
46861.9%
💯9612.7%
🕊466.08%
👍303.97%
😢283.70%
👏263.44%
😍253.31%
👌222.91%
🏆81.06%
🍓30.397%
🤔30.397%
🤗10.132%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 259 of the 514 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 789 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 514 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 04:50 UTC54 viewsread 23 September 2026

"قدَّر الله وما شاء فعل، هوِّن على نفسكَ دومًا بهذه العبارة الرائعة، لقد بذلت قدر طاقتكَ، وما شاء ربكَ أن يكون قد كان، فارضي نفسكَ وأرضها وتيقن برحمة الله، لكي تقوى على التحمل والمثابرة، ولا تنسى أن لنفسكَ عليكَ حق، فلا تتعجل أبدًا وهون علي نفسكَ ثقل الأيام، وأرح عقلكَ وقلبكَ بالرضا، وأعلم أنه مهما حدث سيراضيكَ الله ويجبر بخاطركَ، وليس بالذي تريده فقط بل بأكثر بكثير حتى أنك ستتعجب من عوض الله عليك!." وإذا سألت عن عوض

23 Sept 2026, 04:46 UTC49 viewsread 23 September 2026

كيف حَال قلبكَ ..! أسأل اللّٰه أن لا يبتليكَ بِداء التفكِير فهو أصعَب مِما تتخيَّل بكثِير!. أسأل اللّٰه أن لا يبتليكَ في جسدكَ ولا يفتنكَ في دينكَ ولا يفجعكَ في أهلكَ ولا مَالكَ ولا ولدكَ، أسأل اللّٰه أن يُصبركَ علىٰ الصِراعات التى في قلبكَ ويُعوضكَ خيرًا ويُنير بَصيرتكَ و يُريحَ بالكَ ويُصلح قلبكَ!. أسأل اللّٰه أن يهديكَ ويُعافيكَ ويَرحمكَ ويَهديكَ ويَثبتكَ ويَرزقكَ، ويُداوي قلبكَ من جُروحهِ. أسأل اللّٰه أن يَست

23 Sept 2026, 04:27 UTC42 viewsread 23 September 2026

‏" وحين يأتيك أحدهم لاجئًا إليك فأحسن إحتوائه وأكرم قلبه، فما أتاك إلا لأنه رأى فيك الأمان. - رسائل وكلمات | 💬

23 Sept 2026, 04:27 UTC42 viewsread 23 September 2026

"ليس كل من يخصص لك وقتًا ليس لديه ما يفعله، ولا كل من يعطيك فرصة تلو أخرى ضعيف الشخصية، ولا من يسأل عنك دائمًا بلا كرامة، فمن الرائع أن تجد من يسأل عنك إذا غبت، ويدنو منك إذا ابتعدت، ويخصص لك من عمره لحظات إذا تغافلت، لكن احذر أن تنخفض أسهم الفرص، فلست تدري متى تكون الفرصة الأخيرة، ومتى يجف الحبر، وتغلق الدفاتر، وتخرس الهواتف، احذر أن تبني علاقاتك على الأخذ فقط، فالآبار مهما فاضت بالماء ستجف إذا السماء لم تمطر." - ر

23 Sept 2026, 04:27 UTC40 viewsread 23 September 2026

"من لا يشعر بصمتك لن يفهم حديثك، ومن لا يرى حزنك لن يصدق فرحك، من لا يفهم نظراتك، لن يفهم كلماتك… وستُرهق نفسك وأنت تحاول أن تُشرح ما لا يُشرح." - رسائل وكلمات | 💬

23 Sept 2026, 04:27 UTC38 viewsread 23 September 2026

"الناس معادن، تظهر حقيقتهم في العواصف لا في الرخاء. فلا تنخدع بلمعانهم في الشمس، وانتظر لترى من منهم سيثبت بجانبك حين تظلم الدنيا في وجهك، الصادقون وحدهم من يبقون حين يرحل الجميع." رسائل وكلمات | 💬

23 Sept 2026, 04:27 UTC39 viewsread 23 September 2026

ـ الذين استباحوا كسر خواطرنا وظنوا أننا نسينا، موعدنا معكم عند الذي لا يغفل ولا ينام، وهناك ستعلمون أن دموع المظلومين لم تكن مجرد ماء. - رسائل وكلمات | 💬

23 Sept 2026, 03:02 UTC46 viewsread 23 September 2026
Video

‏• مواقف الجبر في لحظات الانكسار، لا تُنسى! «عندما تابَ الله على كعب بن مالك بعدما تخلف عن تبوك دخل المسجد مستبشرًا، فقام إليه طلحة يهرول واحتضنه، قال كعب: لا أنساها لطلحة». |

Showing the 12 most recent of 514 posts we hold for @sadakah_jariyah5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@sadakah_jariyah5 edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 11 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTCAnonymous Quiz420 voters

رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم أكثر أزواجه حبًا لها فمن تكون ؟

  1. خديجة رضي الله عنها36%
  2. حصفة رضي الله عنها1%
  3. عائشة رضي الله عنها63%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTCAnonymous Quiz426 voters

قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم إني قد رُزقت حُبها من هي

  1. خديجة رضي الله عنها59%
  2. عائشة رضي الله عنها39%
  3. جورية رضي الله عنها2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTCAnonymous Quiz422 voters

من القائل لرسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ﴿لا تَحْزَنْ إِنَّ اللَّهَ مَعَنَا﴾؟

  1. عمر ابن الخطاب ؟6%
  2. أبو بكر الصديق ؟92%
  3. عثمان ابن عفان ؟1%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTCAnonymous Quiz420 voters

من هي زوجة النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم التي انجبت أكثر اولاده؟

  1. عائشة11%
  2. سودة5%
  3. خديجة77%
  4. حفصة6%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTCAnonymous Quiz422 voters

من هي ذات النطاقين ؟

  1. فاطمة بنت رسول الله12%
  2. أسماء بنت أبي بكر85%
  3. عائشة رضي الله عنها3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTCAnonymous Quiz347 voters

في شرح الأربعين النووية من راوي الحديث الأول إنما الأعمال بالنيات وإنما لكل امرئ ما نوى؟

  1. أبو هريرة57%
  2. عمر ابن الخطاب39%
  3. عائشة رضي الله عنها4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 514 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“(عُــلـو الهِـمّـة) ‌|•°.𓆩ᥫ᭡𓆪” (@sadakah_jariyah5), 30,496 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sadakah_jariyah5.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.