Подумала, как классно было бы сейчас устроиться кем то в партию Яблоко. Могла бы говорить: «сначала работала в Золотом Яблоке, теперь просто в Яблоке»
custom 525397088116358050711custom 54741946163014061963

Channel
@sad_blondy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry
424subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003167329294 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sad_blondy |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sad_blondy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 424 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:14 | 425 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 423 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 423 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 422 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (10 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 167 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
218 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5291799514292698292 | 77 | 35.3% | |
| custom 5253970881163580507 | 51 | 23.4% | |
| custom 5253985312253695599 | 50 | 22.9% | |
| custom 5334887382120407139 | 17 | 7.80% | |
| custom 5474194616301406196 | 11 | 5.05% | |
| custom 5222163465765932207 | 6 | 2.75% | |
| custom 5375554103868930359 | 4 | 1.83% | |
| custom 5377729534869124992 | 2 | 0.917% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sad_blondy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Подумала, как классно было бы сейчас устроиться кем то в партию Яблоко. Могла бы говорить: «сначала работала в Золотом Яблоке, теперь просто в Яблоке»
custom 525397088116358050711custom 54741946163014061963
Референсы моей будущей свадьбы
custom 529179951429269829217custom 52539853122536955994custom 53755541038689303594custom 54741946163014061963
Свои 22 года я встретила в Париже. В этот день в честь Дня Взятия Бастилии прошел грандиозный салют, когда в небе буквально мерцало слово СВОБОДА на французском. Никогда не видела салют в честь торжества свободы, это так восхитительно, очень захотелось жить в такой стране. А вообще вот что я поняла к 22 годам: - иногда образ, который мы выстраиваем годами, становится нам абсолютно чужим, в какой то степени он даже …
custom 529179951429269829226custom 52539853122536955993custom 52221634657659322072custom 53777295348691249922
Скоро я выложу очень много интересных штук из евротрипа — в путешествии сил на хорошие тексты не хватало. Обязательно поделюсь клевыми историями, адресами пиздатых мест (в том числе адресами винтажек) и просто ощущениями
custom 529179951429269829211custom 52539708811635805072custom 52221634657659322071
Когда я беру в путешествие книгу, у меня всегда с ней складываются особенные отношения. Так и случилось с автобиографией Патти Смит «Хлеб ангелов». Начала читать ее еще в Москве, а закончила уже в Варшаве. Обычно, когда великие люди пишут свои автобиографии, они всегда пытаются себя сделать максимально избранными. С книгой Патти Смит нет такого ощущения. Она не превозносит себя, не выставляет себя недосягаемой и не …
custom 52917995142926982929custom 52221634657659322073
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52539853122536955999
Я встретилась с приколеной. Прошу не завидовать.
custom 525397088116358050735custom 52539853122536955996custom 53348873821204071394
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 529179951429269829214
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 525398531225369559911custom 54741946163014061965custom 53348873821204071393
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 525398531225369559917custom 533488738212040713910custom 52539708811635805073
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @sad_blondy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Аня подавилась молоком” (@sad_blondy), 424 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sad_blondy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.