Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

📢 صبارسانه | اخبار کارگران و بازنشستگان

@saba_rasanehh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,382subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002421192736
TypeChannel
Username@saba_rasanehh
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/saba_rasanehh

Growth

1,3781,3821,3806 August 2026 — 1,378 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,380 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,382 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,377–1,383 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 11:411,382+2
7 Aug 2026, 18:521,380+2
6 Aug 2026, 19:171,378first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.5%
avg views ÷ 1,382 subscribers
Avg views / post
187
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.581%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (5 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,551
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍541.7%
216.7%
👌216.7%
👏216.7%
🙏18.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC176 viewsread 6 August 2026

😳غیبت_کردن 🔥 هر صفتی که به دیگران می‌چسبانی، ممکن است اول به خودت بچسبد! پژوهشگران در یک مطالعه مشهور که در سال ۱۹۹۸ در مجله معتبر Journal of Personality and Social Psychology منتشر شد، طی چهار آزمایش رفتار صدها داوطلب را بررسی کردند. نتیجه شگفت‌انگیز بود: وقتی افراد درباره شخصیت دیگران قضاوت می‌کنند، شنوندگان همان صفات را به‌طور ناخودآگاه به خود گوینده نیز نسبت می‌دهند؛ حتی اگر هیچ شناختی از او نداشته باشند. خلاص

6 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC295 viewsread 6 August 2026

📢 معوقات فروردین و اردیبهشت؛ حق بازنشسته یا گروگانِ کمبود منابع؟ 💰 افزایش سنواتی حقوق دست و پاشکسته اعمال شده، اما مابه‌التفاوت دو ماه نخست سال هنوز پرداخت نشده و کمبود منابع مالی، علت اصلی این تأخیر اعلام شده است. با این حال، کمبود منابع توضیح وضعیت مالی است، نه مجوزی برای بلاتکلیف گذاشتن حقی که بر پایه قانون باید به‌موقع پرداخت شود. بازنشسته‌ای که سال‌ها حق بیمه پرداخته، امروز نباید هزینه ضعف مدیریت، انباشت بدهی‌

6 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC134 viewsread 6 August 2026

🔸 حمید باوی بحره (رییس کانون بازنشستگان تامین‌اجتماعی شهرستان اهواز) گفت: معوقات افزایش حقوق و متناسب‌سازی ماه‌های فروردین و اردیبهشت سال ۱۴۰۵ بازنشستگان تامین‌اجتماعی تا به امروز پرداخت نشده است و زمان پرداخت آن نیز از سوی سازمان تامین اجتماعی در هاله‌ای از ابهام قرار دارد. 🔹 وی در ادامه افزود: قطعاً ارزش مادی این معوقات به مرور کاهش یافته و دیگر گره‌گشای مشکلات معیشتی بازنشستگان تامین‌اجتماعی نیست، اما هم‌چنان حق

6 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC66 viewsread 6 August 2026

گروه‌های مطالبه‌گر، بارها پیش‌نویس اصلاحیه اساسنامه را به وزار ت کار ارائه داده‌اند. جلسات متعددی برگزار شده و تا نزدیکی مهر و امضا نیز پیش رفته، اما ناگهان همه چیز متوقف شده است. چه نیرویی در پشت پرده، این اصلاحات را زمین‌گیر می‌کند؟ ۲. آیا وزارت کار و سازمان تأمین اجتماعی از اشتباهات اساسنامه بی‌خبرند؟ اگر کارشناسان با صدها مدرک تحصیلات عالیه در وزارت کار و سازمان تأمین اجتماعی حضور دارند، چگونه است که سال‌هاست

6 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC48 viewsread 6 August 2026

Ali Ahmari: «پرتقال‌فروش را پیدا کنید!»|واکاوی بحران بازنشستگان در سایه اساسنامه‌های ناقص و اراده‌های معطوف به تداوم وضع موجود مقدمه سال‌هاست که گروه‌های مطالبه‌گر بازنشستگان تأمین اجتماعی، با برگزاری جلسات متعدد، تهیه پیش‌نویس‌های اصلاحی و پیگیری‌های مستمر، خواستار اصلاح اساسنامه کانون‌ها و اجرای قوانین مصوب شده‌اند. اما هر بار که این تلاش‌ها به نزدیکی مهر و امضای نهایی می‌رسد، ناگهان «قول چراغ علاالدین از قوری ب

6 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC71 viewsread 6 August 2026

🔴 یک تأخیر ساده برای مدیران، یک بحران بزرگ برای سفره بازنشستگان! تأخیرهای مکرر در پرداخت مستمری و متناسب‌سازی، برای برخی مدیران شاید فقط یک جابه‌جایی در برنامه مالی باشد، اما برای بازنشسته‌ای که چشم‌انتظار حقوق ماهانه است، یعنی داروی عقب‌افتاده، شرمندگی مقابل خانواده و سفره‌ای که هر روز کوچک‌تر می‌شود. بازنشستگان سال‌ها حق بیمه پرداخت کرده‌اند تا دوران سالمندی همراه با امنیت و آرامش باشد، نه انتظار و نگرانی. در شرا

6 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC76 viewsread 6 August 2026

حسن صادقی رییس اتحادیه پیشکسوتان ی چیزی توی این مایه گفته : «دولت بدهی‌اش به تأمین اجتماعی را با ماشین‌حساب ساده حساب می‌کند، اما بازنشسته‌ها باید با سود مرکبِ تورم زندگی کنند؛ انگار بدهکار گفته من قسطی حساب می‌کنم، طلبکار هم باید قسطی پیر شود!» 😐 @saba_rasanehh

6 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC181 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

تحریم‌ها؛ مانعی پنهان بر سر راه اقتصاد دیجیتال ایران ( گزارش صبا رسانه ) تحریم‌ها فقط محدودیت اقتصادی نیستند؛ برای بسیاری از برنامه‌نویسان، فعالان فضای مجازی و کسب‌وکارهای دیجیتال به مانعی جدی در دسترسی به بازارهای جهانی، ابزارهای تخصصی، خدمات ابری و دریافت درآمد بین‌المللی تبدیل شده‌اند. این شرایط موجب افزایش هزینه فعالیت، کاهش فرصت‌های شغلی، مهاجرت بخشی از نیروهای متخصص و کاهش توان رقابتی اقتصاد دیجیتال ایران شد

6 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC84 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

اپلیکیشن هایی که بسته به کاری که میخواین انجام بدین، میتونه کلی بهتون کمک کنه:

6 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC86 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

سیاست عرصه منافع شخصی نیست -رحمن قهرمان پور- @uttweet

6 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC82 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🚨 بازنشسته‌ای با ۲۱ میلیون حقوق؛ آیا هنوز می‌شود به آینده امیدوار بود؟ بازنشسته‌ای که با حقوق ۲۱ میلیون تومانی و در خانه‌ای اجاره‌ای زندگی می‌کند، باید همزمان هزینه اجاره، درمان، خوراک، قبوض و سایر مخارج ضروری را تأمین کند؛ هزینه‌هایی که با واقعیت‌های امروز اقتصاد همخوانی ندارند. نتیجه این شکاف، کاهش قدرت خرید، فشار معیشتی و از بین رفتن امید برای تشکیل زندگی مستقل فرزندان خانواده‌های کارگری است. اجرای کامل مواد ۹۶ و

👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @saba_rasanehh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,177,486 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“📢 صبارسانه | اخبار کارگران و بازنشستگان” (@saba_rasanehh), 1,382 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saba_rasanehh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.