2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38–40 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 20:16
39
no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:30
39
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 7 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
486
Videos
17
Links
75
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
20s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
44 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
22
50.0%
🔥
17
38.6%
👍
3
6.82%
🐳
1
2.27%
😁
1
2.27%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 12 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Это что-то новенькое
Продолжаю рассказывать про необычный дизайн вещей. Недавно ездили на соврнования в организацию, которая работает с пластиком. На входе нас встречал вот такой малыш. Ну шикарный же! До чего техника дошла!
Из плюсов:
❤️ Ботинки не пачкают пол
❤️ Не надо трогать руками при надевании
❤️ Практически незаметны на ногах
❤️ Легко снимаются
❤️ Необычно
Из минусов:
😡 Немного катаешься на сырой поверхнос…
Необычный дизайн авто
Первую машину мы увидели с сыном ещё летом, пока ехали куда-то на такси. Сказать, что она всех заинтересовала, даже таксиста, — ничего не сказать. Сначала она показалась мне нелепой, но сейчас, когда на улице киллометровые пробки, а в огромных машинах сидит по одному человеку, задумываешься о том, что всем пора переходить на мини-машинки!
Второй пример — это просто шедевр саморекламы. За данно…
Когда праздники уже закончились, а всё ещё хочется продолжения ощущения нового года ...
... тогда нужно идти в магазин за всякими прикалюхами!
Сделала небольшую продуктовую подборку на разный кошелёк.
1) макарошки Barilla «Ёлочки»
2) макарошки Barilla «Снежинки»
3) чипсы Cheetos «Снежинки»
4) шлопушки Любятово «Ëлочки»
5) колбаса Ремит «Новогодняя фантазия» (в зелёном сыре)
6) кофе Tasty «Christmas Blend»
Про посл…
Ещё один день чтобы загадать заветное желание!
Верю, что теперь-то оно точно сбудется🤞
А я хочу показать тебе подборку фраз, которые мне попадались на глаза в этом году! Желаю тебе замечать приятные мелочи на своём пути, ведь жизнь — это не гонка, а куча разноплановых моментов! Береги и цени каждый из них!
P. S. Для меня это праздник в квадрате, ведь в ночь с 13 на 14 родился мой любимый близкий человечек 😊.
Поздравляю тебя с наступившим Новым годом и, конечно же, Рождеством!!!
Кто-то уже во всю вливается в рабочие будни, а я решила замедлиться и не торопиться в новом году. Конец предыдущего года был чересчур насыщенным на события и болезни так, что моя продуктивность сошла на нет. Очень откликнулись слова Лизы Марс про культ продуктивности, которые в очередной раз заставили задуматься над тем куда и как я иду. А когда …
❤5👍2🐳1
Signed Кристина Лебедева
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @s_t_ilno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,004,619 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“С(т)ильно!” (@s_t_ilno), 39 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/s_t_ilno.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
