Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 580–590 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 12:17
589
+2
8 Sept 2026, 07:41
587
+1
30 Aug 2026, 12:57
586
+5
24 Aug 2026, 10:17
581
-1
23 Aug 2026, 12:30
582
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 54s
Average length
2m 54s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
120 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
77
64.2%
🙏
17
14.2%
❤🔥
11
9.17%
👌
5
4.17%
🤝
5
4.17%
🔥
3
2.50%
👍
2
1.67%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
زندگی در زمان حال به معنای رها کردن خود به تصادفی بودن لحظه نیست. برعکس، به معنای داشتن سرعت درک هر چیزی در ثانیه ای که اتفاق می افتد، بدون عبور از فیلتر عقل است. به این ترتیب جهان همیشه خود را تجدید می کند و هیجان انگیزترین فرصت ها به روی ما باز می شود. بنابراین، فرد از همه چیزهایی که در اطرافش اتفاق می افتد آگاه می شود.
📘کتاب راز مار پردار، آرماندو تورز
به دام انداختن نقاط ضعف برای از بین بردن آنها کافی نیست. شخص می تواند از حالا تا روز قیامت ضعفهایش را به دام اندازد، بدون اینکه کوچکترین تفاوتی کند، به همین علت ناوال نمی خواست به من بگوید که چه کنم. چیزی که واقعا سالک نیاز دارد تا شکارچی تمام عیاری شود، داشتن هدف است.
🦅دون خوان
چرا میکوشیم آدمها را تغییر دهیم ؟
این درست نیست.
" آدم باید یا دیگران را همانطور که هستند بپذیرد، یا همانطور که هستند به حال خودشان بگذارد."
آدم نمیتواند آنها را عوض کند، فقط توازنشان را بر هم میزند. چون یک انسان از قطعههای واحدی درست نشده است که بتوان تکهای را برداشت و بجایش چیزِ دیگری گذاشت. او یک کل است، و اگر آدم یک سویش را بکشد، سوی دیگرش، چه بخواهی چه نخواهی، کشیده میشود.
نامه به فلیسه
هنگامی که از راه تولتکها به سوی آزادی سخن میگوییم، متوجه میشویم که آنها نقشه کاملی برای در هم شکستن اهلی شدگی و رسیدن به آزادی دارند. آنها " قاضی " ، " قربانی و نظام باورها را به انگلی تشبیه می کنند که ذهن آدمی را اشغال کرده است. از دیدگاه تولتک ها همه انسانهایی که اهلی شده اند بیمار هستند. آنها بیمارند چون انگلی بر ذهن و مغزشان تسلط دارد. غذای این انگل عواطف منفی است که زاییده ترس هستند.
اگر به توصیفی که از انگل میش…
🪐فایل صوتی بخش مقدمه
⚜ کتاب قدرت سکوت
⚜ قسمت 2
✨ تعاریف مبانی اولیه میدان های انرژی
و اصطلاحات آموزه های دون خوان
✨رویا دیدن
کمین و شکار کردن=تسلط بر رفتار
🦅از آموزه های دون خوان
باورهای کلیدی شمنیسم
همه چیز زنده و دارای روحه کوه، رود، سنگ، حیوان و درخت.
بیماری ریشه روحی داره ناراحتی جسمی اغلب نشانه بینظمی روحیه.
دنیاها به هم پیوستهان دنیای فیزیکی فقط یه لایه از واقعیته.
ناوال به من گفت که برای یک انسان، اندوه نیز به اندازه وحشت قدرت دارد. هر دو میتوانند لحظه ای سکوت را به همراه داشته باشند. یا اینکه سکوت خودبخود می آید، زیرا سالک مبارز در تمام مدت زندگیش در طلب آن است.
هیچگاه تو این لحظه سکوت را حس کرده ایی؟
🦅دون خوان
@s_shemen
میثاق چهارم دون روئیز
کاربردی ترین میثاق در جهت عدم رنجش از دیگران
@s_shemen
❤1👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @s_shemen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
nabz_text_music @nabz_text_music · 55,756 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سالکان مبارز” (@s_shemen), 589 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/s_shemen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.