Channel
@sQheep
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
39subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002030125104 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sQheep |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sQheep |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 39 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 39 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 30 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20250601101214724215010300166799425303239 | 1 | 1 June 2025 | 1 June 2025 |
| 20250602101214858915010300166799425289854 | 1 | 2 June 2025 | 2 June 2025 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2025 to 25 November 2025. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🎁 GIVEAWAY by @LOVELACEFIELD & @SUPERRIOR 🎁 What you can win: • @.Daddyx — 3 days rent • @.Booyfriend — 7 days rent • Saldo 100.000 — 4 winners (share) • Telegram Premium 1 Month — 1 winner • 100 Telegram Stars — 2 winners 🖌 RULES 1. Wajib subs @lovelacefield & @superrior sebelum drop nomor (akan dicek). 2. Share BBC ini ke bot / channel yang kamu punya. 3. Setelah itu, kamu boleh drop nomor 1-350 dicomsect. Good l…
Hi, mari jajan apk premium, teleprem, telestars, upsubs atau wtb serviceee. mari membuat ku sibukk biar ga kepikiran dan nangiezz 24jam bestie
jajan yuk, agar aku bisa jajan pizza 😔😔
15s 4K (2 slot) siapa mau??
Hi, aku udah open kembali yaa teleprem, telestars, upsubs, wtb service & apk premium lainnya boleh langsung chat @chiqxuita / @kijeya. avail formless, rush & rekber yaa Aku lagi sebar DANA Kaget nih! Yuk, sikat segera sebelum melayang 💸💸💸 https://link.dana.id/danakaget?c=sd5jdb6m8&r=hYJcdb&orderId=20250602101214858915010300166799425289854
sold semua yaa. Aku lagi sebar DANA Kaget nih! Yuk, sikat segera sebelum melayang 💸💸💸 https://link.dana.id/danakaget?c=s9ydu7s6k&r=hYJcdb&orderId=20250601101214724215010300166799425303239
Teleprem juga open avail rush ya, bisa nomor luar & bulk juga. Jajan banyak-banyak yuk 👹👹
jajan yuk, ada gift baru 😋😋
Akuu always openn teleprem yaa seng, sung chat @kijeyac or @chiqxuita 💖💖
avail bulk & nomor luar untuk teleprem nya. join ress aku bakal dapet price 51k for resell 🤗
Hi, long time no see. aku udah open kembali yaa teleprem, telestars, upsubs, wtb service & apk premium lainnya
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @sQheep. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,335,493 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@sQheep named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sheep! 🧺💭🐏 OPEN!” (@sQheep), 39 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sQheep.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.