Channel
@s3faxxx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
55subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002413189488 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @s3faxxx |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/s3faxxx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 55 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 56 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 56 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (9 May 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 623 |
| Reactions total | 169 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
438 reactions across 15 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5253450769213977646 | 45 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5265024426176421448 | 43 | 9.82% | |
| custom 5399898012862408593 | 38 | 8.68% | |
| custom 5274205550131832564 | 31 | 7.08% | |
| custom 5204318890263341042 | 27 | 6.16% | |
| custom 5253792648610738720 | 27 | 6.16% | |
| custom 5253878891554042805 | 27 | 6.16% | |
| 💘 | 26 | 5.94% | |
| custom 5253918778915320454 | 20 | 4.57% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 4.34% | |
| custom 5336882098076661289 | 18 | 4.11% | |
| ⚡ | 16 | 3.65% | |
| 🙏 | 15 | 3.42% | |
| custom 5967483584615815836 | 13 | 2.97% | |
| custom 5425077619412464809 | 11 | 2.51% | |
| custom 5321351496334329739 | 10 | 2.28% | |
| 🕊 | 10 | 2.28% | |
| 💅 | 9 | 2.05% | |
| custom 5231171339330554319 | 8 | 1.83% | |
| custom 5289573432743205583 | 6 | 1.37% | |
| 5 further kinds | 19 | 4.34% |
Custom emoji. 14 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 438reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @s3faxxx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 May 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤩 https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4kUnT1j/
custom 52650244261764214488custom 54046707609103518454custom 52828845967052843913custom 52043188902633410421custom 52742055501318325641custom 53998980128624085931
🪖 https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4j8FS9k/
custom 526502442617642144810custom 52043188902633410429custom 53998980128624085939custom 52311713393305543191
🌟 https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSXTAVrFo/
custom 526502442617642144815custom 53998980128624085938custom 52742055501318325647custom 52895734327432055832custom 52311713393305543191custom 52534507692139776461custom 53368820980766612891
🪄 https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSX7R3hb8/
custom 52742055501318325647custom 52043188902633410426custom 52311713393305543195custom 53998980128624085932custom 52534507692139776461custom 52895734327432055831
🌸 https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSXV6JLcH/
custom 539989801286240859311custom 52043188902633410428custom 52742055501318325648custom 52895734327432055832custom 54046707609103518452custom 52534507692139776461
❤️🩹
custom 526502442617642144810custom 52742055501318325648custom 53998980128624085937custom 52043188902633410422custom 52311713393305543191custom 52512754885376375551custom 52534507692139776461custom 52828845967052843911
👥 коллаб с матвеем. https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSCEc4k6u/
custom 596748358461581583613custom 533688209807666128910custom 52534507692139776468💘2custom 52312481977703167582custom 52043188902633410421custom 54250776194124648091
🤍 https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSCdqqvCm/
custom 525345076921397764610custom 52539187789153204546custom 53908124776991553285custom 52538788915540428052custom 54250776194124648092custom 52537926486107387201custom 52828845967052843911custom 53213514963343297391
🦇 https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSQsacnKv/
custom 52537926486107387207custom 52538788915540428055custom 53213514963343297395custom 53368820980766612891
🐍 https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSQa3kp9H/
⚡10🙏7custom 54250776194124648097🕊4custom 52539187789153204543custom 53213514963343297392💅1custom 52534507692139776461
😴 с кем у вас ассоциируется автор тгк? [⚡️] - Дин Винчестер. [💅] - Сэм Винчестер. [🙏] - Кастиэль. [🕊] - Кроули. [💘] - Джек Клайн. [🔥] - Люцифер. рт/рк.
🔥19⚡6🕊5🙏1custom 53368820980766612891
🤩 https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSxpeGaea/
💘7custom 52537926486107387205custom 52539187789153204543custom 52534507692139776461custom 53368820980766612891
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @s3faxxx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 382,423 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“сефа лега” (@s3faxxx), 55 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/s3faxxx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.