Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

سُـومِـينَا٢٨

@s0mamh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

339subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001423181444
TypeChannel
Username@s0mamh
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/s0mamh

Growth

339340339.57 August 2026 — 340 subscribers7 August 2026 — 340 subscribers13 August 2026 — 339 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 339–340 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:56339-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:32340no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:18340first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.83%
avg views ÷ 339 subscribers
Avg views / post
13.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026
Posts held20 (23 March 202518 July 2026)
Views total13
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 01:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 21:54 UTC13 viewsread 7 August 2026

-سبحان الله في ناس ساهله عندها تقول الكلمة الشينة وتكسر خاطر البنادم ساهل تقول لبنت "خيرك طالعة هكي مبهدلة" "معقوله لعند توا مافيش حاجة" "قصدك مزال تقري انتي" وغيرها من الكلام الجارح يلي هو اساس تدخل في شي مايعنيهم بس يستثقلو الكلمة الحسنة يستثقلو يفرحو قلب حد بكلمة طيبة "طالعة حلوة اليوم" "ماشاءالله علي طريقة كلامك" " جوك حلو والقعدة معاك ماتنمل" كلمات بسيطة ادخل الفرح للقلب الشخص الثاني وتخليك تكسب اجر من وراها مش

15 Apr 2026, 22:42 UTC81 viewsread 7 August 2026

-الحمدلله علي نعمة الإنشغال الحمدلله علي اليوم المعبي يلي مخليك لاهي في حياتك بس وماعندكش اي وقت تفكري في شي تاني او تتدخل في حياة حد تاني.

15 Jan 2026, 23:12 UTC96 viewsread 7 August 2026

خلال فترتي في مهنة التعليم عرفت انه طيور الجنة هما المعلمين وليس الطلبه💔👍🏻.

16 Sept 2025, 04:01 UTC114 viewsread 7 August 2026

- لا تفتحن أبواب قلوبكن لأشخاص لم يطرقوا أبواب بيوتكن، واجعلوا هذا الباب مُحكم الإغلاق، لا يُوارب لأي عابر بغير تيقُّن منه ومن صدقِه وجِدِّه. تذكرن أنه لا يوجد "رجل" يمنعه مانع _مهما عظم_ عن فتاة يريدها؛ لا مسافة ولا رأي، ولا سفر عاجله! قيمتكن كبيرة.. أكبر من أن يشاور أحدهم فيك نفسه، وأكبر من أن يعلقك بين السماء والأرض فلا تلمسين السماء ولا تستقرين على الأرض، أكبر من المساحة الرمادية التي لا تعرفين فيها من أنتِ في

17 Jul 2025, 14:50 UTC96 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @na3lya

- انا حالياً خاطري في حاجتين : ‏ نمشي للمكة نعتمر 🩷 ربي يرحمها توفت وهي تعتمر ❤️ ‏

30 Apr 2025, 19:11 UTC131 viewsread 7 August 2026

-كونك انسان تاخذ حقك بإيدك من شخص تخطى حدوده معاك حتي ولو كان في فرق عمر بينك وبينه "اكبر منك" هذا مايعنيش انك قليل ادب هذي يعني انك انسان ماتراضش الظلم علي نفسك المحترم يحترم مهما كانت مكانته الاجتماعيه ومهما كان فرق العمر بينكم ماتخليش حد يهنيك ويقلل منك بحجة "هو اكبر مني ومكانته اعلى مني"

27 Apr 2025, 19:30 UTC114 viewsread 7 August 2026

-أدركت مؤخراً أن التخطى ليس في حذف تلك الذكريات التي تجمعنا مع الشخص بل بالاحتفاظ بتلك الذكريات وتذكرها دون ان نشعر بشيء اتجاه تلك الذكريات،

21 Apr 2025, 12:37 UTC122 viewsread 7 August 2026

-فترة الحزن فترة عادية وطبيعي كل انسان فينا تجي فترة بسيطة يزعل ويمر بموجة كأبة وهذا من حقك انك تزعل وتعيش حزنك بس الغلط والمش طبيعي انك تخلي حزنك و زعلك هذا يسطر علي حياتك ويكون روتين لحياتك

19 Apr 2025, 12:51 UTC112 viewsread 7 August 2026

-معزتي وحبي ليك هذا مايعطيكش اذن عشان "تتحيون عليا" عادي جدا نحذفك من حياتي لدرجة تقول هذي كانت تمثل عمرها ماكانت تعزني 💋

13 Apr 2025, 05:16 UTC118 viewsread 7 August 2026

-في حاجات واجد بصارتك فيها مع شخص تاني اطلعك بنادم قليل ذوق وادب فـ أفطن لروحك،

10 Apr 2025, 11:55 UTC117 viewsread 7 August 2026

-اكتشفت انه غبائي وعفويتي في التصرف تزيد مع الشخص يلي نرتاح معه حرفيا ونحبه حـ ندير كل الحاجات الغبية معه حـ نطلع شخصيتي المخفية قدامه وهذا دليل علي قداش مكانته هو مقدسة عندي🩵،

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @s0mamh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,286,766 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سُـومِـينَا٢٨” (@s0mamh), 339 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/s0mamh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.