Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Blind apple|Пирсинг Екб

Channel

Blind apple|Пирсинг Екб

@ryushasblindpiercing

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

59subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003345248997
TypeChannel
Username@ryushasblindpiercing
Created10 March 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded25 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ryushasblindpiercing

Growth

47595325 August 2026 — 47 subscribers25 August 2026 — 47 subscribers2 September 2026 — 49 subscribers11 September 2026 — 57 subscribers18 September 2026 — 59 subscribers25 August 202618 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 24 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45–61 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:5659+2
11 Sept 2026, 03:5557+8
2 Sept 2026, 15:5349+2
25 Aug 2026, 23:0847no change
25 Aug 2026, 14:3247first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 10 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

105 reactions across 7 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3331.4%
🔥1211.4%
custom 52514294416403524881110.5%
💘98.57%
custom 531894754300922415287.62%
❤‍🔥76.67%
🦄76.67%
🙏65.71%
💋43.81%
🌚32.86%
custom 525357596751064607521.90%
21.90%
🌭10.952%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC95 views18 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

красивый пупочек для красивой девочки 🐰

🔥6custom 53189475430092241525❤‍🔥42💋1

15 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC113 views19 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

укус ангела и мочка! 🧸 очень люблю смелых клиентов)

8🦄5❤‍🔥3🔥1custom 52514294416403524881custom 52535759675106460751

10 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC147 views17 reactionsread 25 August 2026

давайте разберем мой самый частый запрос, а именно прокол губы! (сбоку/укус змеи) боковой лабрет - это прокол нижней губы сбоку. украшение проходит через мягкие ткани губы, а снаружи обычно выглядит как аккуратный шарик или камень, так же внутри стоит маленький диск, что не мешает вашим зубкам и деснам. это все из-за того, что на первоначальное заживление проходит с лабретом🧸 как проходит заживление? в первые дни п

🙏6💘4🌚3🦄2custom 52514294416403524881custom 52535759675106460751

8 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC201 views22 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

выполнили два классических хеликса и боковой лабрет для самых красивых 🤩

10💘5🔥5🌭1custom 52514294416403524881

8 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTC313 views11 reactionsread 25 August 2026

🏞🦆🍉🧘‍♂️🚦 💉 септум - 600₽ 💉 вертикальный лабрет - 600₽ 💉 медуза - 600₽ 💉 нострил - 600₽ 💉 бридж - 600₽ 💉 бровь - 600₽ 💉 щеки - 600₽ 💉 язык - 600₽ 💉 смайл - 1200₽ 💉 лабрет - 1200₽ 💉 монро/мадонна - 400₽ 💉 хеликс - 1200₽ 💉 хай-хеликс - 600₽ 💉 конч - 600₽ 💉 мочка - 1250₽ 💉 трагус - 600₽ 💉 соски - 600₽ 💉 пупок - 1200₽ 💉 укус ангела - 2000₽ ценник будет редактироваться, тк. я набираю моделей на те проколы, цена которых 60

5💋3custom 52514294416403524883

3 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC183 views10 reactionsread 25 August 2026

🪡🧦🦩🏝🦆🥛🍉🎪🪡🍎 информация о записи ко мне 💉 я не работаю с лицами младше 18 лет без согласия родителей. на все процедуры приносим паспорт. если вам нет 18, либо с сопровождением родителя, либо с распиской/звонком. 💉 я не работаю с принесенными вами украшениями. все украшения предоставляются мной и подбираются под вашу анатомию, так же, базовое украшение входит в стоимость самого прокола. 💉 перед записью всегда подтве

5custom 53189475430092241523custom 52514294416403524882

3 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC864 views8 reactionsread 25 August 2026

☂️🧦🍉🛞🏝🥛🚦🎃🐺🏝 всем привет! рада видеть вас здесь. меня зовут варя, и я начинающий сертифицированый пирсинг-мастер из ЕКАТЕРИНБУРГА я создала этот канал не только для записи на мои процедуры, но и как место, где можно узнать больше о пирсинге без мифов и страшных историй. здесь будут фотографии моих работ, процесс заживления проколов полезная информация об уходе свободные окошки, новости, моя жизнь и путь к профессии

3custom 525142944164035248832

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @ryushasblindpiercing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Blind apple|Пирсинг Екб” (@ryushasblindpiercing), 59 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ryushasblindpiercing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.