Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net +2,440. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,747–8,919 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 13:46
8,553
+78
6 Nov 2026, 13:14
8,475
+61
3 Nov 2026, 19:17
8,414
+32
1 Nov 2026, 04:38
8,382
+57
28 Oct 2026, 18:49
8,325
+63
25 Oct 2026, 20:21
8,262
+151
22 Oct 2026, 11:11
8,111
+129
18 Oct 2026, 19:30
7,982
+39
16 Oct 2026, 00:56
7,943
+57
12 Oct 2026, 21:51
7,886
+148
6 Oct 2026, 12:20
7,738
+152
29 Sept 2026, 21:20
7,586
+345
19 Sept 2026, 15:18
7,241
+65
15 Sept 2026, 05:57
7,176
+91
11 Sept 2026, 15:01
7,085
+122
6 Sept 2026, 20:17
6,963
+120
2 Sept 2026, 01:43
6,843
+62
29 Aug 2026, 22:55
6,781
+48
26 Aug 2026, 21:17
6,733
+72
23 Aug 2026, 14:35
6,661
first reading
Engagement
225 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.70%
avg views ÷ 8,553 subscribers
Avg views / post
317
135 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
138
of 225 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 65 of 135 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
225 (5 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
42,774
Reactions total
398
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 13:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
176
Videos
2
Links
53
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
5m 06s
Average length
1m 01s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
836 reactions across 100 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💘
195
23.3%
❤
170
20.3%
🔥
144
17.2%
❤🔥
80
9.57%
😭
61
7.30%
🍓
31
3.71%
🐳
26
3.11%
🫡
22
2.63%
🦄
20
2.39%
🥰
18
2.15%
☃
14
1.67%
😱
10
1.20%
😍
7
0.837%
👌
5
0.598%
💋
5
0.598%
👀
4
0.478%
💯
4
0.478%
🤩
4
0.478%
⚡
3
0.359%
🆒
2
0.239%
7 further kinds
11
1.32%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 106 of the 225 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 836 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 225 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
27
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 222 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
22
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ryuheesarchives. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 225 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 138 posts held from the last 30 days (5.07%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Mau tahu class yang ada min Ryu nya? Yang ada mats Prem nya dari tangan min Ryu? THE ONLY ONE DI @ERLOVEST AJA YAAA
Yukk joinn nanti ketemu Mats ntikk nya min Ryu 😍🥰 Belom lagi khusus subscriber Ryu's Archives cuma hari ini aja dapat diskon dari harga normal nya 15k jadi 7K aja lohhh. Hampir hemat setengah harga dan benefit nya lengkap juga GACORR🤩🤩 cekk result nya di sinii https://t.me/ERLOVEST/29909
Subscriber nya Ryu's Archives di kasih kesempatan buat dapat promo di class nya @ERLOVEST yang awalnya 15k jadi 7K aja lohhhh ya. Yukk manfaatkan status kalian sebagai subscriber Ryu's Archives. Waktunya cuma sampai PP hari ini berakhir lohh goodies 😳😳 jangan lupa ajak temen-temen kalian jugaa yaaa❤️❤️ Oh iya janlup pakai form nya di atas ya cinta.
Halo, Ryu's Archives subs! Ketemu lagi sama promo Erlovest, nih. Jadi, setiap kali kami kerja sama atau paid promote di @ryuheesarchives, harga Class Erlovest bakal kami turunkan dari 15K jadi 7K. Yes, khusus buat kalian yang jadi bagian dari subscribers channel ini. Lumayan banget, kan? Bisa dapetin akses class dengan harga yang lebih ramah di kantong.
Tapi perlu diingat, penawaran ini nggak selalu ada setiap bulan…
PROMO CLASS EDITING
ONLY 10.000 IDR! — @ERLOVEST
kelas editing dengan sistem belajar terstruktur, fokus pada hasil dan peningkatan skill.
materi yang dipelajari:
moodboard deco, design, scribble, shape, icons, story deco, artboard, manips, yearbook, content channel, setup ba, qriss deco, dan lainnya
tersedia:
— ratusan tutorial step-by-step
— 7000+ png assets
— materi dari basic hingga advanced
— ruang diskusi & k…
YUPP @BISHAMONTS buka lagi kelas wording nya yang bulan kemarin sempat ludesss dess dess slot nya 😳
Mending langsung aja di cek di sini harga nya sekarang sebelum kehabisan lagi kayak bulan kemaren https://t.me/Bishamonts/15
Sedih banget, denger denger mulai sekarang @bishamonts open membernya sedikit ya? 🫠 Masa seminggu cuma open 2 slots tiap package, padahal worth it and murah-murah banget..
Menurut kalian gimana guys? Demokrasi aja gasih ke bot @BishaJoinBot sambil bawa format join and budget cukup 😉 masa nanti kalau 12 slots habis, harus nunggu bulan depan! Bikin penasaran aja
Kalian tahu ga guys class yang tiap close sebentar udah di tanyain kapan bukan nya lagi? Aslii dah gacor banget ini kelas😭😭 bukan apa2 soalnya 25k isi nya banyak banget benefitnya dari mulai design, art, writing dan juga IPV.
Kelas yang only wording nya aja kemaren langsung sold dalam beberapa hari🫠 GACORRR TENAN pokoknya😭 ayoo buruan join sekarang mumpung lagi buka lagiii😳 @BISHAMONTS
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
ㅤㅤNEW CLASS: 🔊 COMPLETE
ㅤㅤClass editing, writing and art ㅤㅤ
ㅤㅤOpening on the streets about ㅤㅤ
ㅤㅤBrooklyn which exist indeed ㅤㅤ
ㅤㅤFull about similar stalls (..)ㅤㅤ
ㅤㅤBut I admit we are differentㅤㅤ
ㅤWith 100+ Benefits (Portofolio Only.)
ㅤAnd Such Completeness About The
ㅤAccompanying Private Channel Exist
ㅤEngraved On Board With Price──Tag
ㅤAbout All That Only 25.00€ Imprinted
AMERICAN─PAGE:BISHAMONTS 🇺🇸…
❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 225 posts we hold for @ryuheesarchives. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @ryuheesarchives as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 77 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ryuheesarchives named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@duckmx named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 3 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“INFO SMTR25 (SM New Boy Group)” (@ryuheesarchives), 8,553 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ryuheesarchives.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.