Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Viewer47

@rviewer_047

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

65subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001498414052
TypeChannel
Username@rviewer_047
Description꧁ ᴊᴏɪɴ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄʜᴀᴛ ꧂ https://t.me/rviewerchat
Created20 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/rviewer_047

Growth

657 August 2026 — 65 subscribers10 August 2026 — 65 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 64–66 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 02:1665no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:0665first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 November 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,730
Videos
2,210
Links
3,880

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 53s
Average length
2m 27s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2022 to 9 December 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Nov 2022, 16:52 UTC415 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/national-guard-activate-cybersecurity-teams-14-states-ahead-midterm-elections

Signed Teri Heer 🇺🇸

5 Nov 2022, 05:29 UTC330 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Teri Heer 🇺🇸

5 Nov 2022, 00:11 UTC213 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2022/11/03/nolte-election-denier-shepard-smith-fired-by-cnbc/

Signed Teri Heer 🇺🇸

4 Nov 2022, 21:41 UTC162 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Teri Heer 🇺🇸

4 Nov 2022, 21:41 UTC131 viewsread 10 August 2026

These are the only two media reporting this. Why?

Signed Teri Heer 🇺🇸

4 Nov 2022, 21:24 UTC127 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://oig.justice.gov/news/press-release/former-fbi-special-agent-pleaded-guilty-corrupt-destruction-object-official

Signed Teri Heer 🇺🇸

4 Nov 2022, 20:27 UTC93 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/san-francisco/paul-pelosi-attack-suspect-charges/3064054/

👍1

Signed Teri Heer 🇺🇸

4 Nov 2022, 19:54 UTC72 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Teri Heer 🇺🇸

4 Nov 2022, 19:00 UTC68 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1588402815998709760?s=20&t=CYLUOJ4Xz0Zkq1G4RBL8hQ

Signed Teri Heer 🇺🇸

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rviewer_047. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Viewer47” (@rviewer_047), 65 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rviewer_047.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.