Channel
@ruzbahanicom
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
40subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001882958483 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ruzbahanicom |
| Created | 15 December 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ruzbahanicom |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Oct 2026, 12:17 | 40 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 39 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 39 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 15 December 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
27 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 29.6% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 25.9% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 25.9% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 7.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2022 to 7 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Are We Ready for the Post-Quantum Era? The market signals are clear: quantum cryptography, including quantum key distribution (QKD), is expected to grow from $155M in 2024 to over $778M by 2033 (CAGR ~19.6%) and potentially $7.6B by 2030 in broader applications. Notably, researchers recently achieved secure quantum communication over 158 miles on conventional fiber, marking a breakthrough for scalable QKD. Meanwhile,…
Dear Friends, As the new year approaches, I wanted to take a moment to wish each of you a year filled with happiness, success, and good health. May this new chapter bring new opportunities, cherished memories, and countless reasons to smile. Thank you for being such an important part of my life—I’m truly grateful for each one of you. Here’s to a wonderful year ahead, filled with joy and unforgettable moments! Che…
❤4
✍️The Quantum Threat to Network Security 🔺Quantum computing poses a significant threat to modern cryptographic systems, primarily through two quantum algorithms: 1.Shor’s Algorithm: Breaks asymmetric encryption (e.g., RSA, ECC) by solving integer factorization and discrete logarithm problems in polynomial time. This compromises protocols like TLS/SSL, VPNs, and PKIs, threatening data confidentiality and authenticat…
🔥1
✍️Backdoor Attacks in Machine Learning: A Hidden but Dangerous Threat https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ruzbahani_artificialintelligence-machinelearning-cybersecurity-activity-7267230124440252419-7xVi?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios
👍1
✍️Exploring the Future of Communication with Superdense Coding https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ruzbahani_quantumcomputing-innovation-it-activity-7265195896521281538-QpCn?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios
👍1👏1🔥1
✍️How to Detect SQL Injection with Signature-Based Detection… https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ruzbahani_cybersecurity-sqlinjection-signaturedetection-activity-7264657438526611456-aH_x?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios
❤2👍2👌1
✍️Understanding Logs: The Backbone of Monitoring and Troubleshooting Logs play a vital role in keeping systems, applications, and networks running smoothly. Whether you’re a developer, sysadmin, or cybersecurity expert, logs are your best friends when it comes to debugging, performance tuning, and security monitoring. Here’s a quick breakdown of the types of logs you should know: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ruzb…
👍2❤1👏1
⏳ Time-Based SQL Injection: A Hidden Threat You Need to Know https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ruzbahani_cybersecurity-sqlinjection-websecurity-activity-7263940200106483712-f8Xn?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios
👌1👍1🔥1
سلام به همه دوستان من تصمیم گرفتم که مجددا در شبکه های اجتماعی فعالیتمرو شروع کنم و مثل گذشته اپدیتهای منظمی در حوزه تکنولوژی و فرصتهای استارتاپی ارائه کنم. خوشحال میشم در صورت علاقمندی به این موضوعات، همراهی شما عزیزان رو داشته باشم. https://www.instagram.com/alimr.official https://www.linkedin.com/in/ruzbahani https://t.me/ruzbahanicom
🔥4❤1👏1
Types of Punchs ✅ @ruzbahanicom 🌐 http://ruzbahani.com
Types of Electric Motors ✅ @ruzbahanicom 🌐 http://ruzbahani.com
Basics of Electricity ✅ @ruzbahanicom 🌐 http://ruzbahani.com
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ruzbahanicom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ruzbahani” (@ruzbahanicom), 40 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ruzbahanicom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.