Channel
@russiaspeech
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,540subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 13 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001880161265 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @russiaspeech |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/russiaspeech |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 1,540 | +2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:22 | 1,538 | no change |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:47 | 1,538 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
117 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 36 | 30.8% | |
| ❤ | 28 | 23.9% | |
| 💯 | 24 | 20.5% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 12.8% | |
| 🤓 | 6 | 5.13% | |
| ✍ | 5 | 4.27% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.71% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.855% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Помните, как в юности мы искренне жалели бедного Евгения и считали Татьяну наивной страдалицей? Перечитайте роман сегодня, имея за плечами годы, опыт и мудрость, — и вы с удивлением обнаружите, что всё было не совсем так. В этой статье знаменитый сюжет рассмотрен с позиции взрослой женщины. Этот текст — не пересказ старой истории, это приглашение посмотреть на героев по-новому. Татьяна не жертва обстоятельств. Она — …
❤4
«Здесь потустороннее являлось посюсторонним, смысл сходил во всякий предмет». (Давид Робитов, История предательства, 2020) «…но характер его остаётся посюсторонним и сообразным категориям мира». (Н. А. Бердяев, «О назначении человека») Все знают слово поТусторонний, оно ни у кого не вызывает вопросы. А вот - поСюсторонний почему-то вызывает. А оно всего лишь антоним прилагательного «потусторонний». Используется в зн…
👍3❤1💯1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2👍1💯1😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍4❤2😁2🤯1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍5💯2❤1
Слово МИЗОФОНИЯ происходит от двух греческих слов: μίσος — «ненависть» и φωνή — «голос». Так называют синдром избирательной звуковой чувствительности, при котором определённые звуки, которые издают другие люди, вызывают у человека сильную негативную реакцию. Если кто-то постукивает пальцами, причмокивает, громко жуёт, щёлкает ручкой, хрустит пальцами, кряхтит, громко дышит и производит другие звуки, то мизофоны не …
❤2💯2👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤓6❤1💯1
Книжные новинки российских авторов: что читать весной Весна — время, когда хочется обновлений не только в гардеробе, но и в книжном шкафу. Солнце за окном требует ярких сюжетов, а длинные выходные манят устроиться в кресле с чем-то невероятным. Я прошерстила все издательские анонсы, отзывы критиков и предзаказы марта и апреля. Получился список из 12 новинок, которые включают разные жанры: от детективов до скандальны…
❤1👍1💯1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁3❤2👍1💯1
«Господин был в дорожном платье, в драдедамовом плаще» (Н. В. Гоголь, «Мёртвые души») «Она была в лёгком платье из серой фланели, с драдедамовой накидкой на плечах» (И. А. Гончаров, «Обрыв») Сегодня очень редкое и интересное прилагательное. Означает оно «суконный». Драдедам — это тип сукна (плотной ткани), который широко использовался для пошива одежды и и хозяйственных нужд в прошлые столетия. Само слово «драдедам» …
✍5💯3❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁8❤1💯1
Заканчиваем этот месяц еще одной подборкой слов, в которых часто появляются лишние буквы. Джентльмен, а не джентЕльмен Это слово часто пишут с лишней буквой «е» — «джентЕльмен». На самом деле правильный вариант только один: джентльмен. Никакой дополнительной «е» в середине нет. Продюсер, а не продюсСер Частая ошибка — писать с удвоенной «с»: «продюссер». Однако слово пришло из английского (producer), и удвоение «с» …
👍3🤔2💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @russiaspeech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Мнения разнятся
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вернуться на кругИ своя или на крУги своя
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Родная речь: от мема до ЕГЭ” (@russiaspeech), 1,540 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russiaspeech.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.