Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Russian Revolver

Channel

Russian Revolver

@russianrevolver

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

923subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001512065741
TypeChannel
Username@russianrevolver
Created5 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/russianrevolver

Growth

923924923.56 August 2026 — 924 subscribers7 August 2026 — 924 subscribers14 August 2026 — 923 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 923–924 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:15923-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:15924no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:32924first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.4%
avg views ÷ 923 subscribers
Avg views / post
317
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held17 (29 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total5,391
Reactions total292
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

292 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12843.8%
👍6221.2%
🔥3110.6%
248.22%
👏124.11%
🤡82.74%
👎72.40%
🤔62.05%
🤣51.71%
😁31.03%
🤓31.03%
😢20.685%
💊10.342%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 292reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC128 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

„Иногда кажется, что в воздухе есть что‑то, что гарантирует: те из нас, кто живёт в одной стране, кто вместе идёт единым фронтом, каким‑то образом найдут друг друга. Если бы мы пытались найти подтверждение нашей борьбе только в том, что мы — люди, которые разрушили все традиционные предубеждения и были почти полностью исключены из организаций современной Германии, то это, пожалуй, было бы только половиной истории. На

43🤔1

5 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC217 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«Страдание и боль всегда обязательны для широкого сознания и глубокого сердца. Истинно великие люди, мне кажется, должны ощущать на свете великую грусть.» © Родион Раскольников, персонаж романа Фёдора Достоевского «Преступление и наказание».

22

4 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC227 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«Было бы несправедливо по отношению к социалистическому движению, если судить о нём только по его переднему плану. Однако этот передний план безнадёжен. Он предлагает нам зрелище политического и человеческого вырождения — зрелище настолько гнетущей безысходности, что от него хочется поскорее уйти. Эта дегенерация — не состояние, а процесс. Плохое распространяется. Состояние ума, из которого она питается, всё глубже и

👏6👍32😁2🤓1

4 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC228 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Михаил Александрович Зичи, «Падающие звезды», 1879 год.

14🔥5

3 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC238 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @hawk_bookPhoto

НОВАЯ КНИГА! Представляем наше новое издание — «Краткий учебник городского партизана» Карлоса Маригеллы. Написанная в самый разгар революционных выступлений в Латинской Америке, эта небольшая книга стала одним из самых известных и влиятельных текстов, посвящённых тактике современной городской партизанской войны, и получила широкую известность далеко за пределами Бразилии. Её идеи изучали и применяли участники воору

13

3 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC282 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«Задача политики состоит не столько в том, чтобы улучшать людей, сколько в том, чтобы принимать их такими, каковы они есть, и, принимая их такими, приводить их к тому, чтобы они жили в пропитанном самообманом чувстве свободы там, где они являются лишь орудиями, жертвами и терпящими.» © Эрнст Никиш.

👍11

3 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC274 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Георг Грос, «Агитатор», 1928.

11😁1

2 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC382 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Равенство возможно только между равными, то есть теми, кто объективно стоит на одном уровне, в равной степени является «личностью». © Юлиус Эвола, „Люди и руины".

🔥21👏6👎1💊1🤓1

2 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC350 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Отто Дикс, Триптих „Война", 1929–1932.

17

2 Aug 2026, 04:25 UTC358 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Да, нужно уметь беречь не только рукотворные ценности человечества, но и продолжать проявлять такую же заботливость ко всем истинным источникам жизни. © Николай Рерих, „Да процветут пустыни".

153👍3🤡3

1 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC402 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Западная Европа потому иногда кажется хуже, что в ней всякое зло выходит наружу, мало что остаётся тайным. В России же все болезни входят внутрь, съедают самый внутренний состав общественного организма. В России главный двигатель — страх, а страх убивает всякую жизнь, всякий ум, всякое благородное движение души. Трудно и тяжело жить в России человеку, любящему правду, человеку, любящему ближнего, уважающему равно во

6👍6👎6🤡1

1 Aug 2026, 06:54 UTC345 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Оскудение религиозного чувства, распад монументальных форм искусства во всяческого рода импрессионизме и эстетизме, утрата органического чувства бытия, бесконечный проблематизм жизни, подмененной россыпью мертвых переживаний, обезличенье человека механизмом, превращение его души в накипь его профессий, смерть нации в космополитизме, — вот задолго до Шпенглера указанные черты перерождения культуры в цивилизации. © Се

10🤓1🤔1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @russianrevolver. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 229,748 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Russian Revolver” (@russianrevolver), 923 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russianrevolver.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.