Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Актеры без оскара

Channel

Актеры без оскара

@russianbratik

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

413subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 29 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001889407894
TypeChannel
Username@russianbratik
Created12 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded29 September 2026
Last confirmed live5 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/russianbratik

Growth

412413412.529 September 2026 — 412 subscribers29 September 2026 — 412 subscribers5 October 2026 — 413 subscribers29 September 20265 October 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 412–413 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Oct 2026, 07:55413+1
29 Sept 2026, 03:22412no change
29 Sept 2026, 02:47412first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.5%
avg views ÷ 413 subscribers
Avg views / post
167
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held11 (14 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total502
Reactions total54
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 03:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 16s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

208 reactions across 11 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7938.0%
❤‍🔥3114.9%
🔥2311.1%
😁125.77%
🥰125.77%
🍓115.29%
💘104.81%
😍104.81%
🏆94.33%
🎉31.44%
💋20.962%
💯20.962%
👍10.481%
💩10.481%
😡10.481%
🤡10.481%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 208 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 13:19 UTC162 views22 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Я зачем-то снова бороду отрастил

❤9🍓7🔥4❤‍🔥2

20 Sept 2026, 15:59 UTC181 views19 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Forwarded from @scream_islandVideo

Это 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️❤️ Мистический проект уже открыт и ждет гостей! Выбирайте удобный слот и приходите насладиться новым форматом с уникальным сюжетом🖤 🔍🔍🔍🔍🔍🔍🔍🔍🔍🔍🔍 Адрес: м. Дмитровская Вятская 47с4 Стоимость: за команду до 3-х человек с 10:00 до 22:30 включительно — 7,500₽ с 23:45 и далее — 8,000₽ Дополнительный игрок — 1,000₽ Время заглянуть➡️ 10:00 11:15 12:30 13:45 15:00 16:15 17:30 18:45 20:00 21:15 22:30 23…

❤6❤‍🔥5🔥5🏆1💘1💯1

19 Sept 2026, 16:10 UTC159 views13 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Forwarded from @scream_islandPhoto

☢️«АНОМАЛИЯ» Сегодня наша команда «Scream Island» открывает свой уже ТРЕТИЙ проект и первый МИСТИЧЕСКИЙ! - Есть подтверждение, что объект ещё функционирует? - Нет. После последнего сеанса связи тишина. - А персонал? - Часть эвакуировали. Остальные числятся внутри. - Военных отправляли? - Отправляли. - И что с ними? - Последняя группа перестала выходить на связь через сорок семь минут. - Что произошло? - Не знаем. -…

❤‍🔥4❤3🔥3🏆1💋1😍1

2 Sept 2026, 22:53 UTC387 views9 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

А это вот мы ходили на Басту с Гуфом 😎 Было круто🫡 Особенно как мы 3 часа стояли в пробке перед концертом, а потом 2 часа не могли найти карш после него. Ееее

❤6❤‍🔥3

1 Sept 2026, 13:36 UTC361 views14 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤7🔥4😁3

29 Aug 2026, 02:03 UTC469 views30 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

Гуфа ни с кем нельзя путать, Гуф - это Гуф!

❤11❤‍🔥8🥰7👍1💩1🤡1😡1

23 Aug 2026, 20:37 UTC486 views21 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁9❤6🔥5💯1

19 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTC527 views35 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

А это я на форме после баньки и шашлычка на природе. Морда довольная, а значит и собой доволен. Нарцисс вонючий, но зато православный

❤17❤‍🔥9🏆7💘2

18 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC430 views20 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

Смотрите какое чудо 😍

😍9❤7💘4

16 Aug 2026, 21:38 UTC396 views12 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤5🍓4🔥2💋1

14 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC403 views13 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🥰5🎉3💘3❤2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @russianbratik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Мир Квестов
@mirkvestovru · 21,022
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 29 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Актеры без оскара” (@russianbratik), 413 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russianbratik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.