Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Русский переплет

@russianbinding

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

696subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001396820624
TypeChannel
Username@russianbinding
DescriptionКнижный переплет в России и не только: изучение, реставрация и все, что имеет к этому отношение. Немного о библиотеках и библиотекарях. Статьи: https://clck.ru/rfVVq Для связи: @alexandrkruglov
Created13 May 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/russianbinding

Growth

6966 Aug 2026, 13:41 — 696 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 16:37 — 696 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 13:416 Aug 2026, 16:37
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 695–697 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 16:37696no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:41696first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 9 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
476
Videos
24
Links
728

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

145 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7149.0%
👍4128.3%
🔥3322.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2026, 12:38 UTC164 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⁠⁠ Понравилось, как сделан корень. Достойный диплом. Успехов в дальнейшей работе. За позднюю датировку – 1860 вместо 1800 – кроме указанного в посте говорит тиснение матрицей. Может быть на это не следовало ссылаться, поскольку я точно не знаю, когда стали использовать эту технику, но это явно не начало XIX века. Думаю, не ранее середины века.

7

10 Jul 2026, 06:11 UTC163 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⁠⁠ Тачалка. Один из простейших вариантов. Устройства такого типа работали еще в начале прошлого века, а то же самое с ножным приводом — во второй половине 19-го. В мастерских при многих библиотеках можно было видеть такие еще недавно, а может быть и сейчас есть. Здесь педаль для включения сцепления. источник

👍6🔥1

27 Jun 2026, 15:55 UTC258 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @olegvoskoboynikovPhoto

Вчера в парижском Пантеоне торжественно поставлены кенотафы Марка Блока (1886-1944) и его жены Симоны Видаль. Это большое событие для Франции, для исторической науки и для Школы Анналов, которую он вместе с Люсьеном Февром основал. Пантеон – род светского культа, в хорошем, патриотическом и гражданском, смысле этого слова. И Блок, безусловно, такого «культа» заслуживает. Более того, формирование его я чувствовал все

7

3 Jun 2026, 19:55 UTC351 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#СПб #Эрмитаж #2026г

🔥9👍31

18 May 2026, 17:06 UTC555 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⁠⁠ 22–23 сентября 2026 г. в Библиотеке Российской академии наук состоится научная конференция «Книжные древности и их хранители. К 125-летию Рукописного отделения БАН». Заявки на участие в конференции через форму регистрации до 1 августа 2026 г. источник #БАН #2026г

3👍1

7 May 2026, 05:51 UTC468 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

Новгородский музей-заповедник приглашает принять участие в работе XII научной конференции «Новгород и Новгородская земля. Искусство и реставрация», которая состоится в Великом Новгороде 14-16 октября 2026 года. Заявки на участие в конференции принимаются до 1 сентября. Информационное письмо и форма заявки — в Информационном письме. #Новгород #2026г

🔥4👍1

27 Apr 2026, 18:00 UTC529 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Читаем скоропись. XVI век. Об Иване Грозном? #уроки_русского

🔥8👍2

26 Apr 2026, 17:51 UTC645 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⁠⁠ Можно было бы добавить еще 16°. источник

👍11

25 Apr 2026, 16:37 UTC463 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Издательству «Редкая книга из Санкт-Петербурга» — 35 лет. «Редкая книга из Санкт-Петербурга» достойна величания – возглавляемая своим бессменным руководителем – тридцать пять лет – они родились и выстояли в непростое время. Человек захотел, человек работал, человек сделал, и – это достойно. Шикарная книга и вообще все то, чем они занимаются – это ни разу не моя тема, но взглянем на контекст. 1991 год

10

24 Apr 2026, 11:42 UTC291 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Алла Ивановна Илюхина. «Опыт реставрации и подготовки к экспонированию документов на бумажной основе». Доклад на IX конференции «Книжные памятники в аспекте сохранности». 21–23 октября 2025 года. Показано многообразие материалов, с которыми приходится работать: бумага первой половины XX века. Рукописные тексты чернилами и цветными карандашами. «Химический» карандаш не упоминается, но наверняка у них тоже встр

👍93

24 Apr 2026, 07:12 UTC282 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Лаборатория археографических исследований Уральского федерального университета.

15

15 Apr 2026, 14:08 UTC428 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⁠⁠ Хорошая история для тех, кому приходится непросто: https://t.me/typefeed/1323

👍61

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @russianbinding. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 754,138 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Русский переплет” (@russianbinding), 696 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russianbinding.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.