Channel
@russianasgard
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
211subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002482933238 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @russianasgard |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/russianasgard |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 211 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 211 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,428 |
| Reactions total | 92 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
173 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5402476831486025646 | 28 | 16.2% | |
| 😁 | 20 | 11.6% | |
| custom 5404656441489398433 | 17 | 9.83% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 9.25% | |
| ✍ | 15 | 8.67% | |
| 🌚 | 11 | 6.36% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 5.20% | |
| custom 5402092848524862420 | 8 | 4.62% | |
| custom 5402300578913103064 | 8 | 4.62% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 4.05% | |
| 🤮 | 7 | 4.05% | |
| custom 5402589896500092168 | 5 | 2.89% | |
| custom 5402076398800116254 | 4 | 2.31% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 2.31% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 1.73% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.73% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.73% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 1.16% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 1.16% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.578% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ахуенно конечно посидели вчера. ну сегодня вот точно будем больше рисовать нежели ломать стол в бутыльфилде. врублю часов в 8-9. ну и выложу прогресс сюда, а то мы это походу вечность рендерить будем
custom 54046564414893984336custom 54024768314860256461
посидим в батле часик, потом по видосам + рисовать https://www.twitch.tv/russianasgard
custom 54024768314860256462
Итоговое по тесо Тем кто не особо следит за бустачом, в одну статью собрал весь обновленный и новый материал по игре. Если кратко - все старое актуализировано, все новое метовое - добавлено. https://boosty.to/russianasgard/posts/13ec197d-6bc3-42b3-a719-be6cfe7a88ea Далее на месяц от тесо отхожу, займусь роликом по вселенной тес, который еще весной обещал. Такая вот хуйня пацаны
custom 54023005789131030645🔥4custom 54024768314860256464
кстати судя по рейтингам, всем ахуенно заходит. положа руку на сердце могу сказать только одно - те кто жрут этот кал заслуживают тот мир в котором они живут
custom 54046564414893984335custom 54024768314860256463custom 54020928485248624201
посмотрел 9 сезон рика и морти. я более конеченной хуйни в своей жизни еще не видел. я знал что там все плохо, но чтобы блять настолько. тут буквально мои пасты выше применимы напрямую
custom 54025898965000921684custom 54024768314860256462custom 54020928485248624201
4 сезон батлы, абсолютно объективное мнение от экспертной базы построенной в категории жанров бродилка+стрелялка. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uc3cxBPwaLU Это пример как нужно развивать базу игры, даже когда все идет через жопу. Обычно в игру вводят какие-то мелочные обновления на уровне вариаций уже существующего контента. Изредка добавляют небольшие механики, но лишь бы они не входили в противоречие со старым…
custom 54024768314860256464custom 54046564414893984333custom 54023005789131030641
https://www.twitch.tv/russianasgard/clip/MushySmellyPeppermintSmoocherZ-xV7PzP5vGlsuA-Ph
custom 54024768314860256463custom 54046564414893984333custom 54025898965000921681
реформы завели https://t.me/addemoji/RussianAsgard
custom 54020928485248624205custom 54020763988001162544custom 54024768314860256464custom 54023005789131030641
киркбрайт наркоман. подтверждено. уебищней этого только основываясь на фантазию про синюю сисястую телочку снять целую франшизу фильмов
😁4👀2🌚1custom 54020928485248624201custom 54023005789131030641custom 54024768314860256461
Photo, posted without a caption
😁3❤1custom 54024768314860256461
Photo, posted without a caption
✍4🌚4👀1custom 54024768314860256461
Video, posted without a caption
🥰3❤2😁1custom 54024768314860256461
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @russianasgard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 350,214 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Russian Asgard” (@russianasgard), 211 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russianasgard.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.