Channel
@russian_german
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
39subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002241246750 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @russian_german |
| Description | Русскій Нѣмецъ — канал о политике, культуре и традициях глазами русского немца. Анализируем актуальные новости, события в России и мире, их влияние на общество и место в нём. Говорим о ценностях, истории и современности, сохраняя уникальный взгляд. |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/russian_german |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 39 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 39 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
184 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 32 | 17.4% | |
| custom 5474522038838238551 | 27 | 14.7% | |
| 🤔 | 22 | 12.0% | |
| ⚡ | 21 | 11.4% | |
| 💯 | 16 | 8.70% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 8.15% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 7.61% | |
| custom 5271690765175627499 | 11 | 5.98% | |
| 🕊 | 9 | 4.89% | |
| 🫡 | 9 | 4.89% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.63% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 1.63% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.09% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2025 to 24 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
28 августа 1941 года Президиум Верховного Совета Советского Союза подписал постановление о депортации русских немцев из Поволжья. Всего 894 626 немцев были переселены в Сибирь, Казахстан и Среднюю Азию или интернированы в трудовые лагеря. Подневольные работники так называемого Трударми трудились за заборами из колючей проволоки, страдали от голода и холода, были разлучены со своими семьями и платили за преступную и…
🕊7
Доброе утро 🇷🇺
custom 527169076517562749910🫡4❤3🔥2
ЕС снова в деле: миллиарды на пушки, а не на безопасность🤔 Фон дер Ляйен выкатила план на сотни миллиардов евро, чтобы "перевооружить Европу". Типа, угрозы реальные, надо больше пушек, ПВО и дронов. Но, конечно, про терроризм и внутренние проблемы в Германии — тишина. Зато предлагают ослабить долговые правила и вбухать 150 млрд евро в военные нужды, включая помощь Украине. А Венгрия и Словакия уже против, мол, хват…
💯8⚡3custom 52716907651756274991
Памятник П. Г. Ольденбургскому у основанной им больницы #РусскиеНемцы #Россия Русскій Нѣмецъ
custom 54745220388382385518⚡3🕊1
Почему такая же участь ждёт АДГ в Германии: Как и FPÖ в Австрии, «Альтернатива для Германии» (АДГ) сталкивается с политической изоляцией со стороны основных партий. В Германии крупные силы, такие как ХДС/ХСС, СДПГ и «Зелёные», избегают коалиций с правопопулистскими партиями, даже если те показывают сильные результаты на выборах. АДГ, как и FPÖ, критикует политику ЕС, выступает за ужесточение миграционной политики и …
💯7
Австрия: коалиционные переговоры успешно завершились Коалиция из трех партий - Народная (ÖVP), Социал-демократическая (SPÖ) и либеральная (NEOS). «Народного канцлера» и лидера Партии свободы (FPÖ — австрийская версия немецкой «Альтернативы для Германии») Герберта Кикля оставили за бортом. Подчеркну - ПОБЕДИВШИХ оставили за бортом. Голосуй - не голосуй… Реальность ЕС. Хоть не посадили - и то славно.
👍1🤔1
Влияние ситуации в Сирии на Германию и Россию После переворота в Сирии и прихода к власти исламистов Германия опасается активизации местных радикалов. Успехи группировки HTS могут вдохновить немецких исламистов на выезд в Сирию для участия в боях, а также на распространение пропаганды. Возвращение боевиков с опытом в Германию может создать угрозу безопасности. Для России ситуация также сложная: смена власти в Сирии…
⚡6
Президент Франции Эммануэль Макрон предлагает использовать французский ядерный потенциал для защиты Европы, включая возможное размещение атомных истребителей в Германии. Новый канцлер Фридрих Мерц ранее призывал Францию и Великобританию расширить ядерный защитный зонт на Европу, чтобы снизить зависимость от США при Трампе. Мерц обсудил это с Макроном перед его визитом в Вашингтон. #Новости #ЕС Русскій Нѣмецъ
🤔5🤯2⚡1
❗️Париж, Берлин и Лондон готовы направить войска на Украину для обеспечения прекращения огня, но потребуется поддержка США, – глава Минфина Франции Ломбар. Опасная риторика... Петроградскiй вѣстникъ 🌟
🤔6⚡3🤯1
🇩🇪 Ничего нового... #Новости #ФРГ #Россия Русскій Нѣмецъ
😁4👍2👏1
🇷🇺🇩🇪 Царь-батюшка Николай и Кайзер Вильгельм #история Русскій Нѣмецъ
custom 547452203883823855110❤2👏2💯1
Даже добавить нечего Русскій Нѣмецъ
👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @russian_german. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,031,449 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Русскій Нѣмецъ” (@russian_german), 39 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russian_german.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.