Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐈𝐯𝐚𝐧 𝐁𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐯

Channel

𝐈𝐯𝐚𝐧 𝐁𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐯

@russchooll

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

40subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003993552339
TypeChannel
Username@russchooll
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/russchooll

Growth

404140.510 Aug 2026, 22:51 — 41 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 23:00 — 41 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 20:53 — 40 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 22:5111 Aug 2026, 20:53
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40–41 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 20:5340-1
10 Aug 2026, 23:0041no change
10 Aug 2026, 22:5141first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.6%
avg views ÷ 40 subscribers
Avg views / post
18.6
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (3 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total373
Reactions total40
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓1742.5%
1127.5%
🙏512.5%
❤‍🔥25.00%
👀25.00%
😢25.00%
🔥12.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC14 viewsread 10 August 2026

Никому. Всё что будет сказано тут - останется в тайне. Идёт за парнем следом, как хвост. Взволнованный, смотрит на русского с неумолимой жаждой, чтобы тот наконец выпустил боль, пар, чтобы уже перестал хоть часть держать в себе. — Я откуда блять знаю, что у этого мудилы в голове. — Белов мысленно выдыхает, пока не слышит как Стаут вновь идет за ним, словно собака за хозяином. Он резко оборачивает, ударяя парня локтем

7 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC15 viewsread 10 August 2026

▶🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🫥 @canada_forestvibe 🫥🫥🫥. 🤩🤩🤩🤩 Раздражение между парнями росло, как ком снега. Однако, оставить было Ваню в очередной раз было великой ошибкой для Стаута. — Хватит убегать, когда ты можешь быть не один, — пальцами вжавшись в перила, встал и продолжает упорствовать. — Ты не должен переносить всё это дерьмо в себе. Хватит, Вань. Стаут нахмурился, какая головой. Нервничал, как никогда. — Если сейчас ты н

6 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC18 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

▶🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🫥 @ussr_sportolymp @canada_forestvibe 🫥 . 🤩🤩🤩🤩 — Я этого не делал!. — чуть ли не кричит парень, отводя руку и ударяет отца в челюсть. — Это все был твой обожаемый сынишка друзей, меня даже не было в том месте! Хватит!.- пока старший хоть на мгновение теряет внимание, он успевает вновь хорошенько ударить ногой в сплетение и наконец вырваться. Ваня рывком отходит от отца, рвано дыша. — Меня даже слушать не ст

3🍓1

6 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC20 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Но тем не менее, колкие замечания сына игнорирует, будто чего мог нового в них уловить - Ваню всегда будто бесила их схожесть, в чëм Дима его не мог винить. Прекрасно понимал, как и на себя не возлагал надежд. — Пусть забирает и улепëтывайте. Тут вам делать сейчас нечего, — будто зайцев из логова зверя выгонял. На словах о действиях вскинул бровь. — Я не могу терпеть того, что не должно быть в моей семье. За что ты с

😢2🍓1🙏1

6 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC19 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

▶🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🫥 @ussr_sportolymp 🫥🫥🫥 . 🤩🤩🤩🤩 Ваня опустил взгляд на стол, где среди грязных тарелок и мусора стояли пустые бутылки, от которых исходил тот самый резкий, тошнотворный запах. Он глубоко, едва заметно вдохнул, и его лицо исказилось в гримасе отвращения. — Да так, решил посмотреть, как ты тут разлагаешься, пока сам читаешь нравоучения, — слова вырвались жестко, с явной издевкой, но в то же время с глубокой,

🙏2🍓1👀1

5 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC17 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

▶🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🫥 @VictorKartoshka 🫥🫥🫥. 🤩🤩🤩🤩 Ваня кивает, не говоря ни слова. Он и сам не горел желанием задерживаться в этом месте, но отпускать брата сюда одного, после вчерашнего, было бы слишком глупо. Белов переступил порог, впуская себя в полумрак коридора, который когда-то был так знаком, а теперь казался чужим. Его голубые глаза осторожно скользили по когда-то родным стенам, по выцветшим обоям, по коричневым

🙏2🍓1👀1

5 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC16 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

•разговор с @VictorKartoshka • Я надеюсь, ты после этого не будешь пытаться найти в нем что-то адекватное? О себе подумай наконец-то. Блять он совсем из ума выжил, видимо

🍓2

5 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC15 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

•разговор с @VictorKartoshka • Пошел бы. Я бы не позволил ему тронуть тебя, Вить. Ладно, может блять, хорошо, я переборщил тогда, да, признаю. Он с цепи сорвался, в последнее время, мне тоже писал недавно, надо бы заблокировать уже. Поэтому он блять с тобой так себя и ведет. Ты же ему против ничего не говорил, а тут сразу. Не сильно хотя бы?

🍓2

5 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC15 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

•разговор с @VictorKartoshka • Блять и ты это называешь нормально? Я тебе говорил, что он не изменится. Почему ты мне не написал про это? Я бы сразу пришел, знаешь же

🍓2

5 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC16 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

•разговор с @VictorKartoshka • Поговорили не много, говоришь? Выглядишь слишком тухло для просто разговора. Что он сделал, вить

🍓2

5 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC17 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

•переписка с @VictorKartoshka • 👻✈️➿➿➿➿➿➿➿✈️ У всех? Блять он что ли говорил с тобой? Я нормально, проветриться надо было просто

🍓2

5 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC18 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

•переписка с @VictorKartoshka • 👻✈️➿➿➿➿➿➿➿✈️ Витя, ты в комнате сейчас? Разговор есть, честно, в этот раз просто разговор. Зайду через пару минут, ты вообще ну как там 🤔

❤‍🔥21🍓1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @russchooll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 117,439 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐈𝐯𝐚𝐧 𝐁𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐯” (@russchooll), 40 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russchooll.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.