Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Russian Chemical Reviews

Channel

Russian Chemical Reviews

@russchemrev

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,220subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001672721426
TypeChannel
Username@russchemrev
Created24 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/russchemrev

Growth

1,2201,2251,222.56 August 2026 — 1,225 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,225 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,224 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,223 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,220 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,219–1,226 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 04:131,220-3
12 Aug 2026, 08:131,223-1
6 Aug 2026, 17:371,224-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:521,225no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:021,225first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

640 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍18028.1%
15724.5%
custom 543395956024097683314222.2%
🔥10516.4%
😁284.38%
💯71.09%
🏆50.781%
🤯40.625%
👏30.469%
🤩30.469%
❤‍🔥20.313%
💊20.313%
😍10.156%
🤔10.156%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 640reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2025 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2026, 09:34 UTC≈1,860 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Представляем 5 выпуск 2026 года Асимметрическая автоамплификация в реакции Соаи О. А. Михайлов🏛, И. Д. Гриднев🏛 (Библиография — 159 ссылок). Термопластичные полиуретаны с кремнийорганическими блоками — современные полимерные системы для высокотехнологичных применений К. К. Баканов🏛, Р. В. Ульянкин🏛, С. Н. Ардабьевская🏛, А. О. Курбатов🏛, Е. Ю. Крамаренко🏛, С. А. Миленин🏛 (Библиография — 224 ссылки). Электрохимическ

🔥74custom 54339595602409768334👍3😁1

19 Jun 2026, 12:53 UTC≈1,260 views45 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📕Clarivate выпустила JCR 2026, и 💻 Russian Chemical Reviews прибавил: IF вырос с 6.0 до 7.1 Отдельная благодарность авторам, которые доверяют нам свои работы, и рецензентам, которые держат планку качества

🔥1413custom 543395956024097683310👍5🏆2😁1

15 Jun 2026, 07:42 UTC≈3,330 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Представляем 4 выпуск 2026 года Рациональный синтез конъюгатов олигонуклеотидов с функциональными молекулами: от простых подходов к комплексным стратегиям М. И. Мещанинова🏛, И. А. Пышная🏛, Д. В. Пышный🏛 (Библиография — 420 ссылок). Спектроскопия гигантского комбинационного рассеяния как высокочувствительный аналитический метод для биосенсоров и тест-систем для обнаружения патогенов Р. Ш. Алиева🏛, В. А. Мушенков

🔥7👍43custom 54339595602409768333

23 Apr 2026, 10:29 UTC≈3,090 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Представляем 3 выпуск 2026 года Методы лазерного осаждения, применяемые для создания новых сенсорных и каталитических наноматериалов В. А. Кочемировский🏛, А. А. Фогель🏛, М. О. Новомлинский🏛, С. В. Кочемировская🏛 (Библиография — 219 ссылок). Metal sulfide quantum dots for photothermal and photodynamic cancer therapy C. Li🇨🇳, L. Yu🇨🇳, G. Shi🇨🇳, Y. Zhou🇨🇳, K. Qi🇨🇳 (Библиография — 275 ссылок). Химическая переработка п

7🔥5custom 54339595602409768334👍2

21 Apr 2026, 10:37 UTC≈4,980 views172 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие коллеги, читатели и авторы! Возникла необходимость объяснить редакционную политику и развенчать некоторые слухи о "Коррумпированности" журнала и "стеклянном потолке" для "недостаточно авторитетных авторов". Связаны эти слухи, по видимому, с просьбой написания заявок. Редакция журнала «Успехи химии» открыта к рассмотрению любых обзоров околохимической тематики, независимо от состава и аффилиаций участников к

👍62custom 54339595602409768333529😁25💯7🔥7🤩3❤‍🔥2

17 Apr 2026, 14:54 UTC≈7,420 views75 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

💻Russian Chemical Reviews — снова в 👍 по Scimago! Коллеги, рады сообщить, что в 2025 году наш журнал подтвердил статус одного из самых цитируемых журналов по естественным наукам в России и сохранил позицию в квартиле Q1 по Scimago. Отдельно хотим отметить, что ключевые показатели цитируемости растут: SJR: 0.811 → 0.955 Cites/Doc (2 года): 5.907 → 7.09 Это результат доверия и высокого уровня работ, которые вы нам п

45🔥15custom 543395956024097683313🤯2

6 Mar 2026, 10:16 UTC≈3,580 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Представляем 2 выпуск 2026 года Гибридные молекулярно-импринтированные наноматериалы для терапии и диагностики А. Ю. Седельникова🏛, Д. В. Пышный🏛, Е. В. Дмитриенко🏛 (Библиография — 252 ссылки). Аналоги пиримидиновых нуклеозидов и противоопухолевые препараты на их основе: пятьдесят лет в строю А. Л. Хандажинская🏛, Е. С. Матюгина🏛, С. Н. Кочетков🏛, М. С. Новиков (Библиография — 216 ссылок). Лизиндеметилазы подгруппы

6👍4custom 54339595602409768334🔥1

4 Feb 2026, 12:22 UTC≈3,940 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Представляем 1 выпуск 2026 года The Stetter reaction: modern methodologies and useful applications in total synthesis of natural products and drugs A. Nawaz🇵🇰, A. F. Zahoor🇵🇰 (Библиография — 140 ссылок). Реакции азотсодержащих гетероциклических соединений, протекающие с раскрытием кольца по связи азот–гетероатом А. В. Смолобочкин🏛, А. С. Газизов🏛, А. Р. Бурилов🏛, М. А. Пудовик🏛, О. Г. Синяшин🏛 (Библиография — 154 с

8🔥6custom 54339595602409768333

29 Dec 2025, 12:19 UTC≈4,720 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Представляем 12 выпуск 2025 года От объемных к тонкопленочным электролитам в полностью твердотельных источниках тока: проблемы и возможности Е. А. Ильина🏛, Е. Г. Калинина🏛🏛 (Библиография — 282 ссылки). Аддитивные технологии в сельском хозяйстве К. С. Ерохин🏛, А. В. Ерофеева🏛, В. П. Анаников🏛 (Библиография — 278 ссылок). Промышленное и лабораторное получение ацетилена: мировой опыт и перспективы плазмохимической те

👍107custom 54339595602409768333👏1😁1

8 Dec 2025, 09:56 UTC≈3,260 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Представляем 11 выпуск 2025 года Технология инфильтрации воздушных электродов ТОТЭ — электролит-ориентированный подход Е. Ю. Пикалова🏛🏛, Н. С. Пикалова, Е. А. Филонова🏛 (Библиография — 397 ссылок). Автономные автоколебательные хемомеханические гели: последние достижения и перспективы развития И. Л. Мальфанов🏛, Е. Г. Чупахин🏛, О. В. Лагунова🏛, А. И. Лаврова🏛 (Библиография — 123 ссылки). Ингибиторы "чувства к

custom 54339595602409768338👍6🔥43

3 Dec 2025, 08:32 UTC≈3,670 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Представляем 10 выпуск 2025 года Последние достижения в синтезе фармакологически активных соединений-лидеров на основе 1,2,3-, 1,2,4- и 1,2,5-оксадиазолов И. А. Стеблецова🏛, А. А. Ларин🏛, Л. Л. Ферштат🏛 (Библиография — 173 ссылки). Биядерные палладациклы — универсальные платформы для дизайна новых цитотоксических комплексов палладия О. А. Залевская, Я. А. Гурьева, А. В. Кучин (Библиография — 80 ссылок). Монокар

👍107custom 54339595602409768334🏆3😍1

13 Oct 2025, 10:28 UTC≈5,070 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Представляем 9 выпуск 2025 года Современное состояние и перспективы изучения реакций по типу Риттера в синтезе N-(гет)ариламидов и N-бензиламидов: от традиционного подхода до фото- и электрохимии С. О. Стрекалова🏛, А. И. Кононов🏛, Ю. Г. Будникова🏛 (Библиография — 122 ссылки). Синтез наноалмазов: основные закономерности и возможность контроля В. Ю. Долматов, М. А. Блинова (Библиография — 129 ссылок). Координационна

custom 543395956024097683385👍5🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @russchemrev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 282,878 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Russian Chemical Reviews” (@russchemrev), 1,220 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russchemrev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.