Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
23.7 average views per post against 6,691 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.355%. Across the 13,251 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,169–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 7.21% and 26.0%, with a median of 14.1%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (5 October 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Posts measured
19 of 19 published in the window (19 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
451
Mature posts only
0.366% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 4 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
43 measurements spanning 90 days, net -3,587. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,651–14,664 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Nov 2026, 23:36
6,691
-48
31 Oct 2026, 22:29
6,739
-108
29 Oct 2026, 00:30
6,847
-75
25 Oct 2026, 15:35
6,922
-111
22 Oct 2026, 06:36
7,033
-50
19 Oct 2026, 08:55
7,083
-3,421
18 Oct 2026, 06:48
10,504
-12
17 Oct 2026, 10:16
10,516
-19
16 Oct 2026, 07:39
10,535
-75
15 Oct 2026, 07:57
10,610
-44
14 Oct 2026, 09:28
10,654
-43
12 Oct 2026, 18:37
10,697
-67
8 Oct 2026, 06:20
10,764
-227
3 Oct 2026, 20:37
10,991
-111
24 Sept 2026, 23:19
11,102
-387
17 Sept 2026, 02:57
11,489
-185
15 Sept 2026, 05:18
11,674
-183
13 Sept 2026, 11:01
11,857
-322
11 Sept 2026, 15:38
12,179
-248
8 Sept 2026, 21:56
12,427
first reading
Engagement
97 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.355%
avg views ÷ 6,691 subscribers
Avg views / post
23.7
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 97 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
97 (29 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
451
Reactions total
8
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Nov 2026, 16:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 47s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,634 reactions across 80 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
553
21.0%
👍
541
20.5%
👏
535
20.3%
❤
504
19.1%
🎉
494
18.8%
💯
3
0.114%
😁
2
0.076%
💔
1
0.038%
🤮
1
0.038%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 84 of the 97 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,809 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 97 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Если все клубы опустели то куда делись российские геи? Они все заняты СВО. Но тогда почему так злятся россияне на то что украинцы так пафосно называют российских военных?
ИСКАЛИ «ПРОПАГАНДУ ЛГБТ» НА СВИНГЕР-ВЕЧЕРИНКЕ: 200 ЧЕЛОВЕК ЛИЦОМ В ПОЛ
В московский клуб Bizarre на Хэллоуин ворвались силовики, уложили лицом в пол 200 человек, обыск, допросы. Повод — «проверка на пропаганду ЛГБТ».
Пришли искать именно сюда, причём уже третий раз. Значит, начальство отлично знает, что на таких тусовках бывает и кто туда ходит. Откуда осведомлённость? По сводкам так не выучишь — похоже, знают по себ…
РОССИЯ «ВНЕЗАПНО» ПОЛЮБИЛА АФРИКУ
Кремль открыл для себя Африку: саммиты, «дружба народов», клятвы в любви. А теперь угадайте, что именно воспылало. Африка — самый молодой континент планеты: 60% моложе 25. Ровно то, чего у самой России нет: своя демография в яме, мужчины призывного возраста кончаются, поколение тает.
Вот и вся «любовь» — стареющего хищника к молодому мясу. Африканцев заманивают «работой» на сборку «ш…
АРГЕНТИНА: ЛЮБИМЫЙ ЧЁРНЫЙ ХОД РОССИИ. ТЕПЕРЬ И ДЛЯ КРИПТЫ
Россияне в Аргентине остались без счетов: банк Galicia разом закрыл доступ гражданам РФ и Беларуси, без объяснений. Совпало это с интересным соседством дат — и вопросов тут больше, чем ответов.
Сначала факт, который всё переобувает. Аргентина для России — не случайная точка на карте. Это обкатанный канал для тёмных дел. Вспомним «кокаиновое дело»: в российском…
ПУТИН УЧИЛ ФРАНЦИЮ КОНТРОЛИРОВАТЬ ИНТЕРНЕТ. ФРАНЦИЯ НАЧАЛА — КРЕМЛЬ ЗАКРИЧАЛ «ЦЕНЗУРА»
28 октября Путин поучал с трибуны: государство обязано контролировать соцсети, нет суверенитета в сети — нет суверенитета вообще. И ткнул во Францию как в пример позорной слабости — мол, она своим интернетом не владеет. Пропаганда ликовала: «Путин ударил по цифровому суверенитету Запада».
Проходит пара дней — Франция делает шаг к к…
ЛОГИСТИКА РОССИИ СЫПЛЕТСЯ: УГОЛЬ ВЫВАЛИВАЮТ НА ГОЛЫЙ БЕРЕГ
«Росатом» хвастается «новой компетенцией»: впервые завезли уголь с выгрузкой на необорудованный берег и впервые пошли речными маршрутами. Так грузы возили ещё купцы сто лет назад — баржа, река, выгрузка на песок. Это не прорыв, это возврат в пещерный век, поданный как достижение.
А за ним — крах логистики. Морской оператор лезет в реки — море не тянет. На Чук…
ВЕЛИКИЙ МОРСКОЙ ПУТЬ РОССИИ: ОТ ЧУЖИХ ВЕРФЕЙ ДО ЧУЖОГО МЕТАЛЛОЛОМА
Списали «Пётр Великий» — последний боеспособный атомный крейсер, флагман Северного флота. Повод поговорить о «великой морской державе» целиком. Потому что если проследить, на чём этот флот держался, выходит грустная и очень показательная история: он почти никогда не стоял на своём.
Начнём с того, что строить большие корабли Россия толком не умела нико…
ВЕКТОР НА СТОРОНУ — ИЗМЕНА. НО НЕ ДЛЯ КРЕМЛЯ
На саммите тюркских государств в Анкаре Токаев предложил дать России статус наблюдателя в ОТГ. На словах — комплимент: «веками связаны с тюркским миром», «Алтай — колыбель тюркской цивилизации». Но давайте отделим дипломатическую вежливость от реального положения дел, потому что это две разные вещи.
Сначала про саму «многовекторность». Когда Казахстан, Армения, Узбекистан …
Showing the 12 most recent of 97 posts we hold for @rusnewsTABU. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Новости с Болот” (@rusnewsTABU), 6,691 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rusnewsTABU.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.