2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 454–456 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Sept 2026, 02:57
455
no change
10 Sept 2026, 14:22
455
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 4 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.8%
avg views ÷ 455 subscribers
Avg views / post
154
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026
Posts held
9 (4 September 2026 – 10 September 2026)
Views total
1,383
Reactions total
176
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
176 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
101
57.4%
custom 5197605843494786418
16
9.09%
custom 5397938631602091363
14
7.95%
❤🔥
12
6.82%
👍
12
6.82%
🐳
8
4.55%
🍓
5
2.84%
🦄
4
2.27%
💘
3
1.70%
😇
1
0.568%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 176 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что самое сложное в учебе по рисованию?
Лично для меня это - передать изображение так, как я хочу, как вижу. ⭐️Почти никогда не получается (пока что).
Уровень пока маленький, но я учусь и стараюсь, верю, однажды я виртуозно буду оживлять свои фантазии на бумаге точь в точь как они выглядели в голове!
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
А в Академии для меня сложным в рисунке...наверное анатомия и светотень. Самая база, без которой никуд…
Лучшая цитата, Лиз)
Твоя любимая, о которой хочеться, что б услышал весь мир...
«Слава храбрецам, которые осмеливаются любить, зная, что всему этому придет конец. Слава безумцам, которые живут так, как будто они бессмертны, — смерть иной раз отступает от них» .
Евгений Шварц🐚
Вот моя любимая цитата!
Считаю, что она олицетворяет мое видение мира, мое отношение к нему. Можно всего бояться, где-то не рискнуть, что-то…
Доброе утро, мои любимые!🤍
Давно мы не разговаривали) предлагаю пообщаться!🍰
В комментариях (или мне лично @LizaBabyeva) можете задать любой вопрос/вопросы, которые вас интересуют насчет меня/моей учебы/чего угодно🤩
Я постараюсь на все ответить🤩
А еще, сегодня просто волшебная погода и я еду на пленэр! Наконец-то)
⭐️⭐️⭐️
Доброе утро!🤩
Вчера навестила любимый Маяк, так соскучилась!
Здесь так хорошо, тихо и уютно🐚
Обязательно заходите! 🐚
А еще было очень приятно увидеть свои часы снова, которые я однажды нарисовала здесь🌻
❤18👍5🐳4❤🔥2🦄2🍓1😇1custom 51976058434947864181
Signed Liza
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @rusalkavmore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Мэйхэм 🇬🇧 @maYhemEng · 27,730 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RUSALKA” (@rusalkavmore), 455 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rusalkavmore.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
