2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 385–387 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 06:04
386
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:23
386
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 18 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.8%
avg views ÷ 386 subscribers
Avg views / post
88.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held
15 (18 March 2026 – 22 July 2026)
Views total
88
Reactions total
2
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
507
Videos
60
Links
221
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 06s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
39 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
15
38.5%
👍
7
17.9%
🎉
5
12.8%
👏
5
12.8%
🏆
3
7.69%
🤯
3
7.69%
😁
1
2.56%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📢 Объявлен Всероссийский студенческий конкурс «Лучший научно-популярный маршрут»
🧭 Министерство науки и высшего образования Российской Федерации совместно с Российским государственным гуманитарным университетом и при содействии Северо-Кавказского федерального университета запускает Всероссийский студенческий конкурс «Лучший научно-популярный маршрут».
📍 Цель конкурса — вовлечение молодежи в развитие научно-популярн…
🇷🇺 ОТКРЫТА РЕГИСТРАЦИЯ НА ПРОЕКТ «ПЕРЕДНИЙ КРАЙ – КУРСК»!
⏰ Приём заявок идёт до 6 июля 2026 года.
🔥 Участников ждут дистанционное обучение по социальному проектированию, медиа-продвижению и использованию ИИ-технологий, анализу геополитической ситуации
после использованию ИИ-технологий, профильные смены в Курской области, добровольческий форум, публичный конкурс волонтёрских студенческих проектов и возможность отп…
Итоги круглого стола «Тяжелоатлетические виды спорта: тренировка, соревнования, обучение»
28 мая 2026 года состоялось мероприятие Научного фестиваля СНО РУС «ГЦОЛИФК» совместно со студенческим научным кружком кафедры теории и методики тяжелоатлетических видов спорта им. А.С. Сидорова.
С приветственным словом к участникам обратился заведующий кафедрой, к.п.н., профессор Виталий Федорович Скотников.
С пленарным докл…
Итоги круглого стола «Лёгкая атлетика: современные подходы к планированию тренировочного процесса и соревновательной деятельности»
20 мая 2026 года состоялось первое мероприятие Научного фестиваля Студенческого научного общества РУС «ГЦОЛИФК» совместно со студенческим научным кружком кафедры теории и методики лёгкой атлетики им. Н.Г. Озолина.
С приветственным словом к участникам обратились:
Иван Дмитриевич Дунгеро…
Научный фестиваль Студенческого научного общества Российского университета спорта «ГЦОЛИФК»
СНО РУС «ГЦОЛИФК» приглашает всех заинтересованных принять участие в Научном фестивале!
Даты проведения: 20 мая — 10 июня 2026 года.
Формат: очный + телемост.
Фестиваль объединит студентов, молодых исследователей и энтузиастов спортивной науки в серии ярких круглых столов по вопросам спорта и смежных дисциплин.
В событии п…
🚀 СНО РУС «ГЦОЛИФК»: первая пятилетка пройдена!
Дорогие коллеги, друзья, единомышленники!
Сегодня у нашего Студенческого научного общества — первый юбилей.
5 лет — это огромный путь от первых робких идей до мощного сообщества, где рождаются открытия. Мы прошли его достойно: конференций, десятки мастер-классов, бессонные ночи над статьями и успехи на всероссийском уровне.
Но давайте честно: это только начало. Пятил…
🚀 Хотите, чтобы ИИ работал на вас в научных исследованиях?
Тогда наш мастер‑класс — точно для вас! Разберём, как заставить нейросети анализировать данные, писать черновики статей и даже помогать с визуализацией результатов – без магии, только практика.
Когда: 20 апреля в 16:30
Где: аудитория 516, МБК
Для практической части мастер-класса рекомендуем взять с собой ноутбуки 💻
Приходите — будет интересно и полезно! 😉
Приглашаем на XXIII кафедральную научную конференцию
«Психология, философия и социология спортивной деятельности – 2026»
📆 7–10 апреля
🗺 аудитории 435, 437, 457 МБК
Если тебе есть что сказать — это отличный шанс заявить о себе. Если пока только ищешь вдохновение — ты точно найдёшь его здесь.
Живые дискуссии, обмен опытом и немного той самой студенческой науки, которая заряжает ❤️
#СНО
#ГЦОЛИФК
🎙 Мы взяли интервью у заместителя председателя Студенческого научного общества — Подлесных Радомира!
В разговоре он рассказал, почему выбрал именно науку и СНО, что его вдохновляет и как молодые исследователи могут прокачать свои навыки 💡
А ещё Радомир поделился своим Tg-каналом, где вместе с «Кузницей здоровья» разбирает тему гиподинамии. Там — советы, лайфхаки и даже немного мотивации.
Подписывайтесь, пока гипод…
НАСТОЯЩИЙ НАУЧНЫЙ ДЕНЬ!
26 марта пройдет сразу две крутых конференции для студентов 🎓💬
Это отличная возможность послушать интересные доклады, обсудить актуальные вопросы спорта и поддержать спикеров
1. V Межкафедральная научно‑практическая конференция молодых ученых
«Знание, наука, практика: актуальные проблемы теории и методики спортивной и профессиональной подготовки в избранном виде деятельности»
📍 246 аудитори…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @rus_science. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 22 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СНО РУС «ГЦОЛИФК»” (@rus_science), 386 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rus_science.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
