Posted without readable text

Channel
русский и точка | ЕГЭ
@rus_itochka
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
703subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002239613595 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rus_itochka |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rus_itochka |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 703 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 703 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
260 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5341457024225912733 | 82 | 31.5% | |
| 💘 | 44 | 16.9% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 14.6% | |
| 🤯 | 30 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5246832847381083296 | 27 | 10.4% | |
| 💔 | 16 | 6.15% | |
| custom 5265021497008740145 | 13 | 5.00% | |
| custom 5391148155163134260 | 8 | 3.08% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.769% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 260reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Video message, posted without a caption
🤯5💔3custom 53414570242259127333
Video message, posted without a caption
🤯4custom 53414570242259127333
Video message, posted without a caption
🤯5custom 53414570242259127333
Video message, posted without a caption
🤯5custom 53414570242259127333
Вышла с апелляции 👋 Рассказываю, как прошло?
🔥8custom 52650214970087401457custom 53414570242259127337
Очень долго я искала пунктуационную ошибку в своем сочинении, проанализировала все запятые, тире, двоеточия (я там немного намудрила со знаками, конечно), но все расставлено по правилам И вот вчера вечером обнаружила в работе какую-то закорючку, похожую на запятую (в том месте, где её не должно быть, разумеется))) Так что в понедельник иду на апелляцию, такой будет новый полезный опыт 👍
🔥8🤯4custom 53414570242259127333
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 534145702422591273311custom 52468328473810832967💔6💘4custom 53911481551631342601
Я ненавижу этот ваш ЕГЭ.
custom 53414570242259127336🔥5😁2
Какими качествами должен обладать оратор? Как вам такая тема сочинения? 🫠 (мне не понравилось)
🤯5
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53414570242259127338🔥2
Я вот ЕГЭ по русскому написала, а у вас как дела? 😺
🔥8💘3custom 53414570242259127332
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rus_itochka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,065,153 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“русский и точка | ЕГЭ” (@rus_itochka), 703 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rus_itochka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.