Channel
@ruq_iya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
568subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001178268362 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ruq_iya |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ruq_iya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 568 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 569 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 569 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 May 2025 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 129 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Последние месяцы не получалось вести каналы. Так как всё внимание ушло в работу над проектом, который, на мой взгляд, не менее важен. Каналы, куда взрослые могут прийти за знаниями, существуют. А вот безопасной онлайн‑среды для мусульманских детей — практически нет. Если говорить честно, ребёнку сегодня просто негде находиться в интернете так, чтобы учиться, играть и развиваться без вредного контента. Именно поэтому…
✨✨✨✨✨
⚜️ Instagram. Первая вкладка сторис. https://www.instagram.com/1.nur__ ⬅️ Беспилотная война нашего времени, и, конечно, на помощь ей приходит информационная война. Как же без неё — это оружие лжецов и лицемеров.
Video, posted without a caption
تقبل الله منا ومنكم صالح الأعمال Пусть Аллах примет от нас и от вас!
🤲МОЛЬБА ПОСТЯЩЕГОСЯ🤲
ВЕЛИКАЯ ПРОРОЧЕСКАЯ МОЛЬБА, ЗАЩИЩАЮЩАЯ ОТ САМЫХ СИЛЬНЫХ ШАЙТАНОВ, СИЛЬНОГО СТРАХА, КОЛДОВСТВА, СГЛАЗА И РАЗЛИЧНЫХ БЕДСТВИЙ 🗝 ✨Абу ат-Тайях рассказывал: “Как-то я спросил ‘Абду-р-Рахмана ибн Ханбаша (да будет доволен им Аллах), который был старым и застал Посланника Аллаха ﷺ : “Как поступил Посланник Аллаха ﷺ в ту ночь, когда шайтаны затеяли против него козни?” ✨‘Абду-р-Рахман сказал: “Воистину, шайтаны явились в …
БЛАГО ДЛЯ РЕБЕНКА ДЕТСКИЙ ПЛАЧ 💦 ◽️Ибн аль-Каииим сказал: «Поразмыслите о том, как Всевышнии Аллах мудро распорядился частым плачем младенцев и какои пользои он им приносит. Врачи и ученые, изучающие природу, подтверждают, что плач младенцев является естественным процессом, которыи приносит им только благо. Они объясняют, что в мозгу младенцев есть влага, и если бы она оставалась там, это могло бы привести …
Photo, posted without a caption
ЗДОРОВОЕ СЕРДЦЕ 🧡 ◽️ Ибн аль-Каййим сказал: «Лишь здоровое сердце в действительности живет. Здоровое сердце это то, которое свободно от ширка, обиды, ревности, скупости, гордости, любви к этой жизни и лидерства». 📖 См. «Джаваб» стр. 143 𝓣𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓐𝓾𝓭𝓲𝓸 𝓡𝓾𝓺'𝔂𝓪𝓱
✔️ ПОЛЬЗА ГОЛОДА ✔️ 🎙Шейх Абдур - Раззак Аль - Бадр УМЕРЕННОСТЬ В ЕДЕ ↩️ 𝑻𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒓𝒂𝒎 𝑨𝒖𝒅𝒊𝒐 𝑹𝒖𝒒'𝒚𝒂𝒉
🔥ДЖИННЫ 🔥 На самом деле ахлю-Сунна уаль-джама’а убеждены в том, что джинны могут входить в тела людей и сводить их с ума, и в этом вопросе они единогласны. А отрицали это только различные философы, которые считали, что подобное не соответствует здравому смыслу. Первыми отрицать начали данный факт сторонники му’тазилитского течения. ➖Сказал ас-Суюты: “Отрицала группа из числа му’тазилитов вхождение джина в тело чело…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ruq_iya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 358,402 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑨𝒖𝒅𝒊𝒐 𝑹𝒖𝒒'𝒚𝒂𝒉 رقية” (@ruq_iya), 568 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ruq_iya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.