Запрет Святых Отцов читать и слушать еретиков и модернистов на духовные темы якобы для научения вере или нравственности или ради интереса и провождения времени. Требник 1906 г., последование исповеди: Рцы ми чадо: не был ли еси еретик, или отступник? Не держался ли еси с ними, их капища посещая, поучения слушая, или книги их прочитовая? Читать далее
![Telegram profile photo for [RU] православный сервер](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/28/2815850c0c9d36a426c6f420e2a99accdefdf70820df14add078604b166f38e7.jpg)
Channel
[RU] православный сервер
@ruorthoserver
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
28subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002405508845 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ruorthoserver |
| Description | медиа [RU] православного дискорд сервера |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ruorthoserver |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 28 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 28 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 140.5%
- avg views ÷ 28 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 39.3
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.17%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (27 June 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 236 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 61
- Videos
- 18
- Links
- 58
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 6m 09s
- Average length
- 2m 03s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 50.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
От «оригинала» к «рукописям»: надёжность ранней передачи Нового Завета. Барбара Аланд пишет, что, принимая во внимание свидетельства тщательной передачи текста в древнейших рукописях (таких как 𝔓⁴⁵, 𝔓⁴⁶, 𝔓⁶⁶ и 𝔓⁷⁵), можно с уверенностью заключить, что во II веке текст НЗ передавался с высокой степенью точности. Почти все папирусы можно возвести к начальному тексту, который они воспроизводят с разной степенью точнос…
Блж.Феодорит(по поводу анафематизма св Кирилла Александрийского:„если(Кирилл) называет Духа собственным Сыну в том смысле, что Он соестественнен Сыну и исходит от Отца: то мы с ним согласны и признаем изречение его православным; если же — в том, будто Дух от Сына или чрез Сына имеет бытие: то отвергаем изречение сие, как богохульное и нечестивое. Ибо веруем Господу, который сказал: "Дух истины, иже от Отца исходит"“
Что нашел
❤1💯1
#ruortho_mem
Казашка приняла христианство ✝️ В комментариях жарко. Слова поддержки ей пишут христиане со всего мира, в том числе, принявшие Веру Христа узбеки, казахи, киргизы. Сыпят проклятиями исламисты, которые и своей религии не знают… Молодец, что пришла к Истинной Вере и не стесняется говорить об этом ! Подписаться MAX TIKTOK TG ДЗЕН ☺️
Вышел из печати очередной сборник "УРОКИ НЕРАССКАЗАННОЙ ИСТОРИИ" В сборнике представлен первый цикл курса лекций, включающий в себя статьи известных историков, политологов А. В. Кочеткова, Е. С. Холмогорова, А. В. Носова, С. В. Перевезенцева, Ф. А. Гайды, Ф. В. Разумовского, А. Р. Дюкова, и С. И. Иванникова, посвященных изучению малоизвестных аспектов истории России. В основе данной работы лежит концепция Русск…
https://patristics.ru/enc/Святоотеческое_понимание_Шестоднева_(по_тезисам) https://mega.nz/folder/sf8xiIYA#Dk7mo3O_y3TN_9oGpZ1okQ 1.прот.Константин Буфеев — шестоднев и теория эволюция; 2.прот.Константин Буфеев — шестоднев и классика эволюционизма; 3.прот.Константин Буфеев — модернистское богословие; 4.Ахиллесовы пяты эволюции (книга); 5.иер.Георгий Максимов — правда о «православном эволюционизме». https://youtu.be…
👏1
🌿 МИССИОНЕРСКИЕ КУРСЫ 🌿 📢Открыт набор на миссионерские онлайн-курсы миссионерского отдела Кызыльской епархии 2026/2027! 📢 «Что лучше, возвышеннее, благороднее служения миссионерского?». «Оно – самое прямое и непосредственное служение Богу и служение самому высшему благу ближних, а именно вечному спасению их» (святитель Николай Японский) 🌿 ЦЕЛЬ КУРСОВ: помощь христианину в становлении на путь самоотверженного служен…
Лжеучитель Владимир Переслегин восстал против ап. Павла? Прот. В. Переслегин: “Мы ниспровергаем этой критикой ложный духовный авторитет его [о. Даниила Сысоева] высказываний о "небесном полисе" и тому подобных фантазиях, не имеющих никакого настоящего православного авторитета.” (https://t.me/zametpere/1850) “На Небе во Христе спасенных ждёт не полис. Уранополитизм - типичная экстраполяция земли на Небо, созданная п…
Всплыла фотография, как нынешний Папа Римский Лев XIV принимал участие в инкском языческом ритуале Пачамама в 1995 году. «Папа Римский - наместник Христа, подчинитесь Риму!☝️🤓»
с память свт.Феофана!
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ruorthoserver. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 984,883 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@panarion_tg · 332 postsΑρτέμιος Σαπράν
@artemioshapran · 7,7281 postАзъ Есмь
@azesmorth · 1,9671 postMission life | Православная миссия в Туве
@missionlife_Tuva · 1,2811 postСкачать видео из Tiktok Instagram
@RuSaverBot · 182,9711 postРУССКИЙ СОЮЗ 🇷🇺
@RusskijSoyuz · 2,8531 postСыны Монархии/Роман Антоновский
@SonOfMonarchy · 87,3841 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[RU] православный сервер” (@ruorthoserver), 28 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ruorthoserver.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.