Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Πανάριον

@panarion_tg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

33subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003639642561
TypeChannel
Username@panarion_tg
DescriptionКанал Вячеслава Фоминых (@fominykhsv91), ЖЖ: vyacheslav-fv.livejournal.com Сайт: patristics.ru
Created8 January 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/panarion_tg

Growth

338 August 2026 — 33 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33 subscribers8 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32–34 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 01:3033no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:4533first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 8 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
170.5%
avg views ÷ 33 subscribers
Avg views / post
56.3
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held19 (8 January 20268 August 2026)
Views total225
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 01:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Links
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 23:26 UTC51 viewsread 11 August 2026

Максим Взоров предпринимает попытки ответить на мою критику его заблуждений. О цитате в моей статье из публициста и литературного критика М. Н. Каткова Взоров пишет: "Пример того, как г-н Фоминых работает с цитатами: Ф., цитата из Каткова (приведена в статье Вячеслава, на которую я ссылался выше): «Литературный язык совершает долгий путь образования. Когда пришел Пушкин, литературный язык был готов». А вот расшире

7 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC46 viewsread 11 August 2026

Далее планирую разобрать заявления Взорова о "Слове о полку Игореве".

7 Aug 2026, 20:27 UTC46 viewsread 11 August 2026

О нападках Взорова на уранополитов и о других его заблуждениях. В комментарии канала прислали ссылку и попросили дать отзыв на статью Максима Взорова, сторонника модерниста Владимира Переслегина. Читать далее... Выводы: 1. Обвинения Взоровым уранополитов несостоятельны (разделы 1.1-1.3, 2.4). 2. Заявление Взорова о том, что “не поняв и не научившись читать классическую литературу хотя бы на уровне добротной сред

28 Jul 2026, 22:12 UTC82 viewsread 11 August 2026

Свт. Василий Великий об отсутствии парадокса лжеца в Пс. 115:2. "Но пророк [Давид сам] не подпадает под [свое] слово (κατὰ τὸν λόγον) [“всяк человек ложь” (Пс. 115:2)], как некоторые из софистов пытаются его уличить, говоря, что пророк впал в обращенное [на себя же] обличение (περιτροπὴν ἐλέγχῳ): ибо [говорят они] если всякий человек лжец и Давид также человек, то, конечно, и он — лжец; если же лжец, то не должно ве

13 Jul 2026, 02:58 UTC294 viewsread 11 August 2026

Запрет Святых Отцов читать и слушать еретиков и модернистов на духовные темы якобы для научения вере или нравственности или ради интереса и провождения времени. Требник 1906 г., последование исповеди: Рцы‌ ми ча‌до: не бы‌л ли еси‌ ерети‌к, или‌ отсту‌пник? Не держа‌лся ли еси‌ с ни‌ми, и‌х ка‌пища посеща‌я, поуче‌ния слу‌шая, или‌ кни‌ги и‌х прочи‌товая? Читать далее

30 Jun 2026, 19:57 UTC210 viewsread 11 August 2026

(продолжение) Свт. Григорий Богослов: “Ибо ты показал в себе добродетель, которая была не без испытаний: не только во время хорошей погоды плыл прямо и управлял душами других, но просиял и среди тяжких искушений, став выше гонителей тем, что мужественно переселился от принесшей (ἐνεγκούσης). У других есть отеческая земля (πατρῷον ἔδαφος), а у нас – горний град (ἄνω πόλιν); другим, может быть, стал принадлежать наш

30 Jun 2026, 19:56 UTC402 viewsread 11 August 2026

Лжеучитель Владимир Переслегин восстал против ап. Павла? Прот. В. Переслегин: “Мы ниспровергаем этой критикой ложный духовный авторитет его [о. Даниила Сысоева] высказываний о "небесном полисе" и тому подобных фантазиях, не имеющих никакого настоящего православного авторитета.” (https://t.me/zametpere/1850) “На Небе во Христе спасенных ждёт не полис. Уранополитизм - типичная экстраполяция земли на Небо, созданная п

16 Jun 2026, 22:44 UTC232 viewsread 11 August 2026

Еще одно лжеучение прот. Владимира Переслегина: Призыв голосовать за председателя ЦК КПРФ Г. А. Зюганова на выборах президента РФ в 1996 г., заявление о недопустимости голосования против Зюганова на этих выборах. Последующая положительная оценка указанного призыва и представление его в качестве примера в 2026 г. Несколько цитат прот. В. Переслегина по указанному поводу (подробнее см. по ссылке выше), 2026 г.: “Как

1 Jun 2026, 19:26 UTC514 viewsread 11 August 2026

О лжеучении прот. Владимира Переслегина о небесном гражданстве.

26 May 2026, 16:07 UTC204 viewsread 11 August 2026

Прецедент использования терминов "сущность" и "ипостась" в различном значении на I Вселенском Соборе.

26 May 2026, 12:47 UTC324 viewsread 11 August 2026

О написании ап. Матфеем Евангелия на еврейском языке и о переводе некоторых других новозаветных книг на еврейский к IV в. Свт. Епифаний Кипрский: “по справедливости должно сказать, что в Новом Завете один Матфей по-еврейски и еврейскими письменами изложил и проповедал Евангелие. Впрочем иные говорили также, что и Евангелие от Иоанна, с греческого языка переложенное на еврейский, сохранилось в сокровищехранилищах иуд

25 May 2026, 12:09 UTC134 viewsread 11 August 2026

Знание языков свт. Епифанием Кипрским. Преп. Иероним Стридонский: "Неужели нужно поставить ему [свт. Епифанию] в вину то, что он знает греческий, сирийский (syram), еврейский, египетский (aegyptiacam) [1] и отчасти (ex parte) латинский язык [2]? Значит, и апостолы, и мужи апостольские, которые говорили языками, виновны, и надо мною, трехязычным, ты [Руфин], двуязычный, будешь смеяться?" (Апология против книг Руфина,

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @panarion_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 404,145 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Πανάριον” (@panarion_tg), 33 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/panarion_tg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.