International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 6 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 201 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 6 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @EvaHermanOffiziell. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 6 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
37 measurements spanning 94 days, net -185. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,843–10,084 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 17:51
9,871
-8
5 Nov 2026, 08:05
9,879
-9
1 Nov 2026, 22:46
9,888
-8
30 Oct 2026, 04:57
9,896
-11
27 Oct 2026, 00:58
9,907
-6
21 Oct 2026, 05:06
9,913
-1
18 Oct 2026, 01:37
9,914
+18
15 Oct 2026, 11:00
9,896
-6
12 Oct 2026, 07:59
9,902
-17
5 Oct 2026, 06:36
9,919
-19
27 Sept 2026, 00:37
9,938
-24
17 Sept 2026, 15:18
9,962
-13
13 Sept 2026, 20:36
9,975
-1
9 Sept 2026, 23:38
9,976
-14
4 Sept 2026, 16:38
9,990
-2
1 Sept 2026, 00:26
9,992
-6
29 Aug 2026, 08:57
9,998
-2
27 Aug 2026, 09:34
10,000
-4
25 Aug 2026, 05:53
10,004
-8
24 Aug 2026, 02:28
10,012
first reading
Engagement
211 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 9,871 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,090
65 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
65
of 211 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
211 (3 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
70,968
Reactions total
1,530
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 10:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,900
Videos
≈4,560
Links
≈6,940
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6h 47m
Average length
3m 59s
Measured directly from 102 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,390 reactions across 211 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
939
17.4%
🤬
799
14.8%
👍
766
14.2%
🤮
680
12.6%
🔥
425
7.88%
👏
315
5.84%
💯
260
4.82%
💩
191
3.54%
😁
151
2.80%
😈
101
1.87%
🤔
97
1.80%
😱
67
1.24%
🕊
66
1.22%
🙈
64
1.19%
👎
63
1.17%
⚡
62
1.15%
🙏
58
1.08%
🤡
56
1.04%
🤯
53
0.983%
🤣
45
0.835%
25 further kinds
132
2.45%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 211 of the 211 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,390 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 211 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 65 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
.
‼️👉 Italien plant drastische Wegzugsteuer – selbst unverkaufte Aktien betroffen
"Italiens Regierung plant eine neue Steuer für vermögende Menschen, die ins Ausland ziehen. Der Vorstoß sorgt bereits für Streit innerhalb der Koalition. Besonders brisant: Betroffene könnten Steuern auf Gewinne zahlen müssen, die sie noch gar nicht erzielt haben. (...)
❗️Nach dem Entwurf für den Staatshaushalt 2027 sollen auf bis…
Rund vier Millionen Arbeitnehmer beteiligten sich in Spanien am ersten Generalstreik seit 14 Jahren gegen explodierende Wohnkosten und Mieten;
bei Protesten wurden 20 Menschen verletzt und 40 festgenommen, während landesweit 750.000 Wohnungen fehlen und junge Beschäftigte fast ihr gesamtes Gehalt für die Miete aufbringen müssen.
⌨️☝️Short-News jetzt Abonnieren und nichts verpassen: 👉📬 ABO: https://t.me/uncutnews_s…
💥UNFASSBAR, ABER WAHR:
"Wahnsinn. Ein belgisches Gericht verurteilt einen Mann zu 17 Jahren Haft, weil er den Pädophilen verprügelt hat, der seinen 6-jährigen Sohn vergewaltigt hatte.
Das Justizsystem in diesem Land ist ein geschmackloser Witz.
Kein Wunder, dass Flüchtige und Justizflüchtlinge wie Puigdemont in dieses Rattennest fliehen."
Ich habe es überprüft. Der Vergewaltiger hatte 37 Monate auf Bewährung für …
Ein Video der iranischen Revolutionsgarde sorgt für Aufmerksamkeit:
Hochrangige Militärvertreter warnen die USA und Israel vor einer erneuten Eskalation und drohen, sämtliche feindliche Einrichtungen in der Region und darüber hinaus unter Beschuss zu nehmen. Besonders brisant ist die Schlusssequenz, in der auf einer Rakete die persische Botschaft
„Ihr werdet ins Elend gestürzt” zu sehen ist.
und deutet eine militä…
🚨 Paraguay: Zentralbankchef erhebt brisanten Vorwurf gegen die kollabierte Ueno Bank: Das eigentliche Geschäftsmodell sei nicht das Bankgeschäft gewesen, sondern das Sammeln biometrischer Daten von Millionen Menschen für eine landesweite Datenbank – sogar Zahlungen seien teilweise nur per Gesichtserkennung möglich gewesen; war Paraguay ein Testlabor für die totale digitale Kontrolle des Geldes?
⚡️ABO: @uncut_news
Merkel: Ostdeutsche und eingebürgerte Syrer gehören gleichermaßen zum deutschen Volk
Altbundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel hat bei der Verleihung des Internationalen Mendelssohn-Preises in Leipzig erklärt, wen sie zum deutschen Volk zählt. Ihrer Auffassung nach gehören Ostdeutsche ebenso dazu wie eingebürgerte Syrer.
Hier klicken. 🤏
.
‼️👉 "Brutales Video. Flughafen Teneriffa. Hunderte illegale Einwanderer aus Afrika, alle in Blau gekleidet, die darauf warten, direkt auf das spanische Festland geflogen zu werden. Alles junge Männer, eindeutig. So funktioniert das. Das ist keine Einwanderung. Das ist eine geplante Invasion. (...)"
https://x.com/RadioGenoa/status/2119674138398740600?a=NWXFSuNmAfCZf9Lqjow&s=20
JETZT abonnieren und nichts mehr v…
Francesca Donato auf X:
„Bilder, die ihr NICHT im Fernsehjournal seht und die nicht von unseren Politikern kommentiert werden… Das polnische Volk massenhaft auf den Straßen, um die eigene Verfassung gegen den Angriff des EU-Marionetten-Premiers zu verteidigen.“
https://x.com/ladyonorato/status/2116644357646221753?
Abonniert gerne auch unseren Kanal:
https://t.me/WaldgangAlbdruck
Für Kommentare, Hinweise oder Anre…
Spanien, Anfang November. Über 4.000 Migranten ohne Papiere sind angekommen, fast alle muslimische Männer. Es ist nicht vorgesehen, dass auch nur einer von ihnen abgeschoben wird. Pedro Sánchez plant, sie in ganz Spanien und später in ganz Europa zu verteilen. Pedro Sánchez ist ein Krimineller.
👑 CapelloBiancoQ
https://t.me/CapelloBiancoQ
🆘 SIE lachen über uns! SIE belügen uns! SIE betrügen uns! SIE verachten uns 🆘
Ehemaliger BILD Chef:
„Sie saßen alle bei mir zu Hause, zu zehnt, zu zwölft. Und keiner hat sich an die Regeln gehalten. Keiner von den Mächtigen hat an Corona geglaubt‼️
‼️Kanal teilen ‼️
👉🏻 Studien, Urteile, Infos: Der-Runde-Tisch.com
👉🏻 Kanal folgen: https://t.me/rundetisch
.
„Auf den Kanaren wiederholt sich gerade ein neues Ceuta.
Auf den kanarischen Inseln landen tausende Migranten innerhalb kürzester Zeit.
Die Inseln kommen mit dem Ansturm nicht zurecht.
Die EU tut nichts.
Die spanische Regierung tut nichts.
Die deutsche Regierung tut nichts.“
https://x.com/DrLuetke/status/2119679266732273785
JETZT abonnieren und nichts mehr verpassen: https://t.me/EvaHermanOffiziell
🤮27🔥3❤2😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 211 posts we hold for @rundetisch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@rundetisch named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@satellit_d named in 2 posts, 5 November 2026 – 7 November 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
MMnews offiziell @mmnews_offiziell · 29,671 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 7 September 2026
Tichys Einblick @tichyseinblicknews · 19,792 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 September 2026
Kontrafunk - Die Stimme der Vernunft @kontrafunk2 · 24,240 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 September 2026
Neverforgetniki @neverforgetnikiblog · 32,295 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Der Runde Tisch (der-runde-tisch.com)” (@rundetisch), 9,871 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rundetisch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
