Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for J. D. (Luna Harz)

Channel

J. D. (Luna Harz)

@JadrankaDierkes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

139subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001336438587
TypeChannel
Username@JadrankaDierkes
DescriptionFB-Ersatz
Created13 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/JadrankaDierkes

Growth

1397 August 2026 — 139 subscribers8 August 2026 — 139 subscribers7 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 138–140 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 22:46139no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:25139first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.99%
avg views ÷ 139 subscribers
Avg views / post
11.1
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total222
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
16,300
Videos
12,000
Links
30,600

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 26s
Average length
1m 09s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤮240.0%
💯120.0%
😁120.0%
🤡120.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC5 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @MeineDNEWSPhoto

🚨 WEITERE ERMITTLUNGEN NACH GRUPPENATTACKE IN LANDSHUT: NEUN TATVERDÄCHTIGE IDENTIFIZIERT 👊🏾 Nach der brutalen Gruppenattacke auf einen 16-jährigen Deutschen in der Landshuter Altstadt haben Polizei und Staatsanwaltschaft neue Ermittlungsergebnisse bekannt gegeben. Inzwischen wurden neun Tatverdächtige identifiziert, gegen einen 18-jährigen Ukrainer wurde Untersuchungshaft wegen des Verdachts der gefährlichen Körpe

Signed El Jushi

8 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC5 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @EvaHermanOffiziell

. Die EU-Kinder sind trotzig ... ‼️👉 Spanien führt nun auch Grenzkontrollen für Italien ein "Spanien führt als Reaktion auf italienische Grenzkontrollen nun seinerseits Kontrollen für Flüge und Schiffe aus Italien ein. Die Grenzkontrollen sollen um Mitternacht beginnen und bis zum 7. September laufen, teilte das spanische Innenministerium mit. Italien hatte nach der Migrationskrise in der spanischen Exklave Ceu

Signed El Jushi

8 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC7 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ich bin der Meinung, die Solarbenutzer sollten sich solidarisch zeigen und diese Gebühr ab sofort bezahlen. Das hilft der Stromgemeinschaft. Wie seht ihr das? 👇

Signed El Jushi

8 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC6 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @EvaHermanOffiziell

. ‼️👉 Solarbesitzer zahlen ab 2029 neue Gebühr „Ende Mai hatte die Bundesnetzagentur einen Vorschlag zur Weiterentwicklung des Stromsystems gemacht und dabei eine neue Gebühr für Solarbesitzer ins Spiel gebracht. Am Donnerstag hat die Behörde ihren Festlegungsentwurf nun veröffentlicht, der bis Ende 2026 beschlossen werden soll (…) Ab 2029 sollen Prosumer laut Festlegungsentwurf der Bundesnetzagentur (BNetzA) ein

🤮1

Signed El Jushi

8 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC7 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @EvaHermanOffiziell

. Der Russe? Die AfD? Die Rrrrächten? ... ‼️👉🔥 Verdächtige Drohnenflüge über Bundeswehrstandort in der Eifel "In der Nacht zum Freitag sind über einem Bundeswehrstandort im nordrhein-westfälischen Mechernich mehrere Drohnenüberflüge beobachtet worden. Die Bundeswehr bestätigte die Sichtung von zwei Drohnen." (...) ❗️An dem betroffenen Standort werden demnach Patriot-Flugabwehrsysteme gewartet. Die Anlage gilt

Signed El Jushi

8 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC9 viewsread 8 August 2026

Und schon wird nachgelegt 😂. Die Angst muss geschürt werden, so lange die Eisen noch im Feuer liegen. 👇

Signed El Jushi

8 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC9 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ob er sich daran noch erinnert? Wohl eher nicht. Auch für ihn gilt: Was kümmert mich mein Geschwätz von gestern! 👇

Signed El Jushi

8 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC7 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @EvaHermanOffiziellVideo

. ‼️👉 "Video von Merz, der vor mehr als 20 Jahren darüber sprach, wie Masseneinwanderung ein großes Problem in Deutschland ist und dass es nicht mehr nur ein Thema in Deutschlands Großstädten war, sondern dass die Welle der Migranten auch ländliche Gebiete Deutschlands erreicht hatte. ❗️ Er sagte, dass Kriminalität und hohe Arbeitslosigkeit zwei der Hauptprobleme der Masseneinwanderung seien." https://x.com/vis

Signed El Jushi

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @JadrankaDierkes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“J. D. (Luna Harz)” (@JadrankaDierkes), 139 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JadrankaDierkes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.